We’ve talked about Officer Education, but what about the backbone of the @USArmy – the Non-Commissioned Officer or NCO.
Traditionally, NCOs received their training on the job. This was considered the best means of preparing NCOs to be effective NCOs.
In fact, NCO training outside of their units, such as at a school or academy, did not formally happen until after WWII.
This is partly because the NCO Corps was not considered a “professional organization” like the Officer Corps. The rationale was along the lines of – well, the Officer Corps has a formal professional military education system, and the NCO Corps does not.
Some accounts of WWI note that other NCOs within the Allied forces perceived US Army NCOs as “half trained and unsophisticated.” 👀
Similar to how the Officer Education System at the time couldn't rapidly produce skilled staff officers, there was no streamlined education and training system in place to rapidly bring new NCOs up to speed on their responsibilities.
To help meet the need, the Army recalled over 600 retirees to help train new recruits. There was a shortage of NCOs at the time so retired NCOs were needed to help train the younger ones.
At this time, there were no schools just for training NCOs; it was up to the Officers in each company to make time and provide necessary training to their NCOs. As a result, many of these new NCOs were trained only in the basics of their responsibilities.
This was not going to cut it though. General Pershing demanded that the training of NCOs be given a higher priority than before. “They will be imbibed with the habit of command and will be given schooling and prestige to enable them to replace officers once casualties.” 👀
The Secretary of War understood this and directed that NCO duties and responsibilities be “thoroughly represented to them, by means of school courses and official interaction with their immediate commanding officer.”
The War Departed issued a directive that instructed a “sufficient number of men be selected, segregated, and especially trained as noncommissioned officers” among the replacement detachments.
These efforts led to the development of 1100 trained corporals and sergeants being produced every 30 days of training. This was the best of available options at the time to get the desired result – trained and educated NCOs who could better perform their duties.
Untrained new recruits were selected and put through the program to become NCOs, including corporals, and although these recruits were only slightly more skilled than those soldiers who simply received Basic Training, the improvement was measurable.
A temporary school was even established to facilitate this process, and although much debate continued over the professional education of NCOs, these efforts from WWI would not survive demobilization after the Armistice.
If you're just tuning in or you've missed any of the previous threads, you can find them all saved on this account under ⚡️Moments or with this direct link twitter.com/i/events/13642…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
In 1933, as a Lieutenant Colonel for the second time, Lesley McNair took command of 2nd Battalion, 16th Field Artillery Regiment at Fort Bragg, which changed shortly thereafter to 2nd Battalion 83rd Field Artillery Regiment. He would command the Regiment for about a year.
He would later serve as a commander with the Civilian Conservation Corps (CCC), where he planned, directed, and supervised a wide array of CCC activities that also provided him the benefit of experience in that wide array of activities including mobilization.
This week we would like to talk a bit about Lesley McNair, who served as the Army Ground Forces commander from 1942, but before that he was the Army GHQ Chief of Staff and helped shape the @USArmy in ways that we still see today.
There is an excellent book about McNair by @MCalhoun47 and if this week’s threads inspire anyone to learn more about this important @USArmy figure, check it out! @us_sams
There is much more to this topic than we can cover in just two threads per week while still leaving time to cover all the other topics we’ll get to, but how about one more thread about Officer Education in the @USArmy during the Interwar Period?
As many people know, the Army is a lot more than just Infantry, Armor, and Artillery. And Army missions involve a lot more than just closing with and destroying the enemy. The things that officers learn in school help make sure the Army functions as a whole organization.
As we’ve mentioned, all parts of the @USArmy suffered from limited funding throughout the Interwar Years, and a significant factor contributing to that was the general isolationist sentiment throughout the country.
Some officers criticized the lack of available resources (including soldiers), while others made efforts to help maximize use of the resources they had.
When World War I ended with an Armistice, many @USArmy officers were surprised. The situation seemed “unfinished” and there was concern that another war was imminent.
“Among many of the front-line troops in the Allied armies there was… an ambivalent mood, elation at the end of hostilities yet frustration that the victory was somehow muddied by a sense that Germany was still on its feet, bloodied but unbowed.”
“To do the right thing under the extreme pressure of combat requires certain personal characteristics and leadership, but it also requires professional knowledge and decision-making skills – and the resulting professional self-confidence.”
During the Interwar Years, there was really only one place that offered the professional education and training necessary to be a proficient @USArmy officer – @FortLeavenworth – positioned “on the bluffs overlooking the Missouri River in Kansas.”