Justice AM Khanwilkar led bench to shortly hear a plea seeking cancellation of class 12 CBSE & ICSE board exams. Centre has already decided to cancel #CBSE & Attorney General KK Venugopal is set to inform the same
Apart from CBSE, #ICSE board will inform #SupremeCourt today on whether it will follow the same policy adopted by Centre like last year or would depart from it #icseboardexams
Another fresh plea has been filed in the SupremeCourt by @anubha1812 seeking directions to 26 states and 2 union territories to cancel their respective state board or NIOS exams & maintain parity with @CBSE decision #SupremeCourt@AdvMamtaSharma@advocate_tanvi
Attorney General: I have circulated a letter received by me from the govt
SC: We are happy to note that you have cancelled the exam. What is the objective criteria to be adopted for assessment. criteria is not spelt out here
AG: CBSE will take a decision in three weeks. They will take an average. If you want it to be placed before you
Justice Khanwilkar: we appreciate if you place it. The other side may have some issues which can be addressed
AG: they can file an application with the CBSE
Justice Khanwilkar: please place it before us and put it on record
AG: Please give us four weeks
Counsel for ICSE: we have a committee of experts with statisticians etc so that an objective criteria is arrived at
Justice Khanwilkar: Four weeks will delay the process if students want to apply abroad for their education. You can interact on day to day basis via video conference. if you want you can do in overnight also so two weeks is fine
ICSE: This time we will take all subjects into acc
SC: AG has asked for 2 weeks. So we will give you the same time. The other side should also have confidence in the process. Don't bargain on the time frame. Please don't create an embarrassing situation for your client by inviting a direction
Justice Khanwilkar: So 2 weeks?
Adv Mamta Sharma: You have rightly raised the concern as they need to expedite the process. last year the process was before July 15. There are 1.2 crore students with state boards. some state boards have not taken a call @AdvMamtaSharma
Sharma: uniform directions need to be issued to state boards in this case.
Justice Khanwilkar: we are waiting for the objective criteria to be evolved by CBSE. Have some patience. why do you want to precipitate this now?
SC: Let CBSE, ICSE issues be resolved first and then let us go to other issue. Dont be impatient. Interest of students will be taken into account, whether its CBSE, ICSE or other boards.
SC: As requested by AG and counsel for ICSE, a request has been made to defer the matter for 2 weeks to place on record the objective criteria to assess the students. in principle decision to cancel exams has been taken. List after 2 weeks. #supremecourt@anubha1812
[Board Exams] CBSE, ICSE to decide on objective criteria to assess Class 12 students in two weeks; hearing in Supreme Court deferred by two weeks
#SupremeCourt to hear a plea by a Uttarakhand undertrial stating that undertrials cannot be equated with convicts for the purpose of grant of parole to prevent over-crowding in jails amid the COVID-19 pandemic
Justice BR Gavai led bench of the #SupremeCourt to hear a plea challenging Rajasthan High Court’s order dismissing the plea of self-styled godman and life convict Asaram Bapu seeking temporary suspension of sentences to pursue medical treatment #AsaramBapu
Lawyer requests for a passover since Senior Adv Siddharth Luthra is appearing in another court
During the last hearing, the court had ordered the formation of a three-member committee to ensure that persons displaced by post poll violence in West Bengal are able to return to their houses.
The Committee is expected to submit a report to the Court on the status of those who are desirous of returning to their houses but have faced troubles from their locality.
Delhi High Court to shortly pronounce judgment in plea seeking de-registration of Andhra Pradesh CM YS Jaganmohan Reddy's Yuvajana Sramika Rythu (YSR) Congress Party.
The petitioner claimed that despite the Election Commission barring it from adopting “YSR Congress Party” as its party name, the party was illegally and unlawfully using the name on its letterheads, campaign material, etc.
Chawla along with Veeresh Malik and Teena Vachani had filed the suit before the High Court, arguing that until and unless 5G technology is "certified safe", its roll out should not be permitted.
While reserving judgement on whether the suit can be instituted, the Delhi High Court said that Chawla's plea was defective and was filed for media publicity.