Supreme Court bench led by Justice UU Lalit to shortly deliver judgment on a plea filed by senior journalist Vinod Dua to quash a #Sedition case registered against him in Himachal Pradesh for his @YouTube telecast on the #DelhiRiots
#VinodDua was accused of spreading fake news. Besides sedition, the other charges include causing public nuisance, printing of defamatory matter & making statements conducive to public mischief
Court to decide on the important point of applicability of #Sedition law in this case
Justice UU Lalit: There are two prayers. One was for quashing the FIR and one was directions regarding formation of a committee. Preliminary objection was taken by respondent that instead of Article 32 petitioner should be relegated to criminal court
SC:Every journalist will be entitled to the protection under Kedar Nath Singh (sedition) judgment. We reject the prayer that no FIR can be registered against any media personnel with 10 years experience unless cleared by committee
SC: We have rejected the committee formation prayer since it will be directly encroaching upon the legislative domain. However, the FIR against Vinod Dua stands quashed.
#SupremeCourt to hear a plea by a Uttarakhand undertrial stating that undertrials cannot be equated with convicts for the purpose of grant of parole to prevent over-crowding in jails amid the COVID-19 pandemic
Justice BR Gavai led bench of the #SupremeCourt to hear a plea challenging Rajasthan High Court’s order dismissing the plea of self-styled godman and life convict Asaram Bapu seeking temporary suspension of sentences to pursue medical treatment #AsaramBapu
Lawyer requests for a passover since Senior Adv Siddharth Luthra is appearing in another court
During the last hearing, the court had ordered the formation of a three-member committee to ensure that persons displaced by post poll violence in West Bengal are able to return to their houses.
The Committee is expected to submit a report to the Court on the status of those who are desirous of returning to their houses but have faced troubles from their locality.
Delhi High Court to shortly pronounce judgment in plea seeking de-registration of Andhra Pradesh CM YS Jaganmohan Reddy's Yuvajana Sramika Rythu (YSR) Congress Party.
The petitioner claimed that despite the Election Commission barring it from adopting “YSR Congress Party” as its party name, the party was illegally and unlawfully using the name on its letterheads, campaign material, etc.
Chawla along with Veeresh Malik and Teena Vachani had filed the suit before the High Court, arguing that until and unless 5G technology is "certified safe", its roll out should not be permitted.
While reserving judgement on whether the suit can be instituted, the Delhi High Court said that Chawla's plea was defective and was filed for media publicity.