Have written on the catch-up row, and what it tells us about the (many) battles ahead. Quick summary below (1/?) thetimes.co.uk/article/plucki…
Boris told the nation in April that after an “absolutely unimaginable year for... everybody in education”, his biggest priority was “the loss of learning for so many children and young people.” But when Sir Kevan Collins came up with a plan, he wouldn't fund it. How come?
The most popular and effective option is a plan that involves tutoring, and limited extra time in school tightly focused on core academics, esp maths. In other words, pretty much the Collins plan.
But the Collins plan was also ££££ - effectively a 10% increase in school budgets for next three years. And there was concern over detail of the plan (eg whether you could actually stop schools just padding each lesson by five minutes then claiming the cash)
The big thing though was the worry that if they gave into this ultimatum, they have to give in to others. As I say in the piece, the queue of people demanding cash is already stretching round the Downing Street block.
MPs are about to vote down aid cuts (the only spending cut that is actually popular with Tory voters). Then you've got free school meals, Universal Credit, furlough, NHS pay, NHS backlogs, social care...
One common narrative is that because the recovery has been swifter than expected (vaccines for the win!) Rishi has more room to play with. What's not usually appreciated is that rising borrowing costs are rapidly eating into that, and may end up swallowing all of it and more.
(A quick primer: bond yields have risen due to recovery/winding down of QE. Bank of England's duty to curb inflation means that if it gets seriously out of hand, they will have to raise interest rates, increasing bond yields even more. Hello, debt spiral.)
In the colourful words of one insider, we've not merely plucked the magic money tree bare to pay for the pandemic, but chopped it down and burned the wood for kindling.
So the central dilemma for govt is: there are an awful lot of people with very strong cases for extra cash (like Sir Kevan!). But they can't say yes to all of them, or maybe even any of them. In short, stormy weather ahead...
There's obviously much more on this in my column, and much more detail on the behind-the-scenes thinking. Please give it a read thetimes.co.uk/article/plucki…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I wrote my Sunday Times column yesterday about the problems Boris Johnson will have paying for education catch-up. No such problems in Scotland - because they've only put in £20m, or 1/155th of the amount. What's going on? A quick thread (1/?) thetimes.co.uk/article/plucki…
The Johnson govt put £1.7bn into extra tuition last year, and £1.4bn this. The Scottish govt claims to have already spent £400m on 'education recovery'. On the face of it, given population size, this makes Scotland slightly more generous in terms of catch-up funding. Right?
Wrong! The £400m was spent primarily on ventilation in classrooms, to help children go back to school safely. Which is good! We all know the virus doesn’t like fresh air. But it’s stopping the slide, not repairing the damage glasgowtimes.co.uk/news/19212491.…
Today, @CPSThinkTank publishes a major report on education catch-up by @racheljanetwolf, @jonathansimons & @gabrielmilland. (Which given the news agenda today, has been a bit like wandering into No Man's Land on the first day of the Somme and asking 'Anyone for a picnic?'...)
The report has some really important findings, which speak to the concerns of those on all sides of the debate - not least one B Johnson, when he said that 'loss of learning' should be our 'biggest priority' and is 'the thing we've got to focus on now as a society'
We did multiple polls and focus groups. It's very clear that parents feel their children have been badly affected by lockdown (67% agree). Only 5% of voters said there was no need for catch-up.
There is a point I haven't seen made on social care. The argument made by @Jeremy_Hunt and others was that you needed to make DfH a department of health and social care, to get it taken seriously. But the pandemic seems to show that when the chips are down, it always loses out.
The reason for the decanting of patients was because they were (legitimately) terrified of hospitals/the wider NHS falling over, and desperate to free up space. But that's sort of symbolic of our wider priorities on health, going back decades.
You can also see it re social care funding - a thorny problem that's just sort of sat there, with lots of solutions proposed (including by us!) but never quite reaching the top of the pile. Whereas NHS itself gets pretty much all the spare cash going, whoever's PM
Worth flagging this @CPSThinkTank research showing that rail privatisation has been a noted success story - customer satisfaction with our trains is consistently among the highest in Europe, and we have more and more reliable trains spectator.co.uk/article/nation…
Prices are high, but that's because we actually make people pay for the cost of their tickets, rather than disguising it with subsidy. And many of the problems, esp punctuality, are a symptom of using our track more efficiently than others, meaning less slack in the system
Obviously there are things to fix, many of which the Williams Review addresses. And obviously the pandemic has been shattering for the business model. But the narrative that this is a failed system in need of rescue just doesn't stand up to the facts.
V rough rule of thumb calculations. UK GDP is £2 trillion. 2.1% growth in March £42bn. Vaccine programme cost £12bn. Obviously you can't credit it for the full rebound, but it's starting to look like the best investment UK govt ever made.
This is a strong column from @iainmartin1 but the line about 'an entirely unnecessary stamp-duty holiday' is classic wisdom-of-hindsight stuff, and misses the point/success of the policy thetimes.co.uk/article/this-p…
As our paper 'Help to Build' argued, the housebuilding sector is massively and dangerously cyclical - when recession hits, builders down tools. And due to the structure of the industry, housebuilding lags significantly behind the wider economy in the recovery.
This is a big reason why we consistently fail to hit housebuilding targets - because the sector is trapped in a cycle of boom and bust cps.org.uk/research/help-…