I wrote my Sunday Times column yesterday about the problems Boris Johnson will have paying for education catch-up. No such problems in Scotland - because they've only put in £20m, or 1/155th of the amount. What's going on? A quick thread (1/?) thetimes.co.uk/article/plucki…
The Johnson govt put £1.7bn into extra tuition last year, and £1.4bn this. The Scottish govt claims to have already spent £400m on 'education recovery'. On the face of it, given population size, this makes Scotland slightly more generous in terms of catch-up funding. Right?
Wrong! The £400m was spent primarily on ventilation in classrooms, to help children go back to school safely. Which is good! We all know the virus doesn’t like fresh air. But it’s stopping the slide, not repairing the damage glasgowtimes.co.uk/news/19212491.…
Also, even with all that ventilation, Scottish schools were also way slower than English to get pupils back into classrooms - meaning more educational damage. bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotla…
They also appear, as Magnus Linklater sets out in this powerful piece, to have been far worse at providing support during lockdown. During the first wave, more than half of Scottish students received NO CONTACT FROM TEACHERS AT ALL (my angry caps). thetimes.co.uk/article/we-mus…
See this heartbreaking quote. As Linklater says, he doesn't know if this is typical - but that's partly he can't find any evidence 'of what concrete steps the government has taken to check on the performance of individual schools'.
Oh, and Scotland also seems to have done worse than England at handing out laptops etc. news.stv.tv/politics/table…. And remarkably, they managed to match or even outdo England in terms of screwing up exams, too scotsman.com/news/opinion/c…
Last week, @cpsthinktank (which I run) and @PublicFirst_PF (which I don’t) teamed up for a study on education catch-up in England.
We found that the damage is very real, and concentrated among the most disadvantaged pupils. Given all of the above, the situation is likely to be just as bad in Scotland, or worse.
But here’s the weird thing. The SNP’s main initiative so far has been a “national summer of play”. There are two problems with this. The first is that just £20m is being spent on it, which isn’t so much a government programme as a rounding error. thetimes.co.uk/article/pupils…
(Given that there are just under 800,000 school pupils in Scotland, this comes to £25 a head. Not so much a summer of play as a summer of a play, maybe just about stretching to a snack in the interval.) gov.scot/news/enhanced-…
But what was striking was that the announcement was explicitly contrasted by “education experts and advisers to the Scottish government” (and unions) with the blunt, brutal, “simplistic” approach taken by Sir Kevan Collins in England (ie tutoring and 30 mins extra in school)
It was classic SNP fare: we are nice and clever, they are nasty and wrong. In fact the entire policy seemed to be based on Being Nicer Than England, not what parents/pupils actually want and need.
Our report included extensive polling and focus groups, as well as studies of the data. We found that parents were overwhelmingly concerned that their children had fallen behind in core academic subjects, especially maths.
The emerging evidence also suggests that this is where the worst impacts have been. (The one thing kids hadn’t lost out on during the pandemic, as every parent knows, was time spent running around in parks…)
In fact, when we tested multiple options for catch-up with parents, all pro-academic interventions were popular (in particular tutoring, but also longer terms and Collins’s 30-minute extension to the school day, with academic focus).
What was NOT popular in any way at all, either in focus groups or polling, was the idea of ‘giving them a fun summer’ (potentially with longer holidays, which some have called for).
Now, it may be that Scottish parents are utterly different from English parents - since education is devolved, we only polled in England.
Or it may be that the SNP has chosen the wrong policy, given it an abysmally pitiful amount of money, and then wrapped the whole thing in a tasty wrapper of anti-Englishness. That Scottish children have been let down during the pandemic, and are being let down still.
And the sad truth is that this is entirely of a piece with the entire course of Scottish education in recent years. It’s behind a paywall, but this from Alex Massie is an utterly devastating run-through of the failures of the system. thetimes.co.uk/article/alex-m…
Highlights include the 'Curriculum for Excellence' fiasco, and the decision to withdraw Scotland from international league tables so that the public wouldn't notice how badly the country's pupils were doing.
Now, in the original announcement of the “summer of play” there was a hint of further funding that might actually address the problems parents actually care about - “key areas such as literacy, numeracy and health and wellbeing”.
But given the SNP’s track record in this area, it’s hard to see things improving. (Ends.)
(Forgot to link to our report, which is here. As I said, England-only, but it's hard to see why Scottish parents/pupils should be significantly different. cps.org.uk/research/lost-…)
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Have written on the catch-up row, and what it tells us about the (many) battles ahead. Quick summary below (1/?) thetimes.co.uk/article/plucki…
Boris told the nation in April that after an “absolutely unimaginable year for... everybody in education”, his biggest priority was “the loss of learning for so many children and young people.” But when Sir Kevan Collins came up with a plan, he wouldn't fund it. How come?
Today, @CPSThinkTank publishes a major report on education catch-up by @racheljanetwolf, @jonathansimons & @gabrielmilland. (Which given the news agenda today, has been a bit like wandering into No Man's Land on the first day of the Somme and asking 'Anyone for a picnic?'...)
The report has some really important findings, which speak to the concerns of those on all sides of the debate - not least one B Johnson, when he said that 'loss of learning' should be our 'biggest priority' and is 'the thing we've got to focus on now as a society'
We did multiple polls and focus groups. It's very clear that parents feel their children have been badly affected by lockdown (67% agree). Only 5% of voters said there was no need for catch-up.
There is a point I haven't seen made on social care. The argument made by @Jeremy_Hunt and others was that you needed to make DfH a department of health and social care, to get it taken seriously. But the pandemic seems to show that when the chips are down, it always loses out.
The reason for the decanting of patients was because they were (legitimately) terrified of hospitals/the wider NHS falling over, and desperate to free up space. But that's sort of symbolic of our wider priorities on health, going back decades.
You can also see it re social care funding - a thorny problem that's just sort of sat there, with lots of solutions proposed (including by us!) but never quite reaching the top of the pile. Whereas NHS itself gets pretty much all the spare cash going, whoever's PM
Worth flagging this @CPSThinkTank research showing that rail privatisation has been a noted success story - customer satisfaction with our trains is consistently among the highest in Europe, and we have more and more reliable trains spectator.co.uk/article/nation…
Prices are high, but that's because we actually make people pay for the cost of their tickets, rather than disguising it with subsidy. And many of the problems, esp punctuality, are a symptom of using our track more efficiently than others, meaning less slack in the system
Obviously there are things to fix, many of which the Williams Review addresses. And obviously the pandemic has been shattering for the business model. But the narrative that this is a failed system in need of rescue just doesn't stand up to the facts.
V rough rule of thumb calculations. UK GDP is £2 trillion. 2.1% growth in March £42bn. Vaccine programme cost £12bn. Obviously you can't credit it for the full rebound, but it's starting to look like the best investment UK govt ever made.
This is a strong column from @iainmartin1 but the line about 'an entirely unnecessary stamp-duty holiday' is classic wisdom-of-hindsight stuff, and misses the point/success of the policy thetimes.co.uk/article/this-p…
As our paper 'Help to Build' argued, the housebuilding sector is massively and dangerously cyclical - when recession hits, builders down tools. And due to the structure of the industry, housebuilding lags significantly behind the wider economy in the recovery.
This is a big reason why we consistently fail to hit housebuilding targets - because the sector is trapped in a cycle of boom and bust cps.org.uk/research/help-…