Something extraordinary happened to me. I went to The Met on Fri b/c my favorite painting, Alice Neel's The Fuller Brush Man was on exhibit. Last time the private owners showed it was the year 2000.
This is a story about two Alices.
Back in 2000 I was a case manager for Nazi Victims and Holocaust Survivors in Northern Manhattan and the Bronx. I'd do things like recertify their reparations, set up homecare, take them to doctors visits, etc.
Later on I got really good at getting them new restitution money. And after 9/11 I started weekly groups for current events and memoir writing. But back then, I was fresh out of college and mainly was just a buddy to them. They'd confide in me about the traumas they didn't
want to burden their families with. One of my clients was Alice Fraser. She was in her 80s with a tiny voice that sounded like the kitty in Mr. Roger's Neighborhood .Mrs. Fraser was a widow without any children who lived in a sparse lamp-lit apartment in WA Heights.
She'd broken her hips a couple years prior getting out of the way of a speeding bus turning a corner a block from her apartment. And was homebound. I helped her with meals-on-wheels and finding a physician who could make house calls, get her money to tip the super's kids
who'd turn the lights on and off at Sabbath. I saw her every couple of weeks. She spent days in a ratty gray recliner which was a universe unto itself -- newspapers and mail stuffed on the sides and under the cushions. One day she surprised me by pulling an article from under
the arm rest fabris. She said " I want to go to The Whitney." Now this was a surprise. The Whitney Museum was miles away and I don't think Mrs. Fraser had even been to the corner store for years. Plus, I'd never heard her express any interest in art.
She then pointed to a photo of a painting in the clipping and said "That's my brother, the Fuller Brush Man." Her brother had died back in the 70s or 80s. I'd heard all about him -- he'd left behind two sons who were now adults.
Back in the '30's he'd been captured by Nazis and taken to Dachau where he did forced labor. He was one of the lucky ones because in 1939 Germany gave Jews the option to leave if they gave up all their worldly possessions and had another country willing to take them.
He eventually became a door-to-door salesman in the US, selling brushes, which is how he must have known Alice N. -- he sold her paintbrushes.
In a feat of logistics, one Saturday, Mrs. Fraser, her nephews and I got her into an Access-a-Ride and took her to The Whitney. It was the centennial of Alice Neel. Alice N. had died years prior after a painful life involving a daughter dying of diptheria, an ex
kidnapping her other child and moving her to Cuba, and an angry boyfriend burning up her studio and all the paintings inside of it. Alice Neel never strayed from the way, painting nonstop, anybody who would sit for her, while raising two sons in her apartment in spanish harlem.
Her portraits were never much accepted by the NY art scene which was overrun by abstract art. But she didn't change her style to be popular. She just kept painting. For her, everybody was a worthy subject -- the young, the old, the poor, the unknown Black and hispanic people
in her neighborhood. one interview I read, she was asked "what's the most reckless thing you do?" And she said "I paint."
At The Whitney, Alice Fraser, in her wheelchair beneath her brother, told all the hipsters dressed in NYC black "That's my brother. That's my brother."
She was so proud. Her nephews and grandnephews were with us, looking at their dad. The painting was a masterpiece and different from the others --. Capturing eagerness, hope. Not long after, Mrs. Fraser had a stroke and lived out her life in a nursing home near my office. I still
saw her regularly but communicating was hard. I'd often reminisce about the trip to The Whitney. She had the clippings at her bedside. I'd see her nephews sometimes when I was there. After Alice died, I lost touch with them. And couldn't remember their last name.
Over the past 20 years, I've been wanting to reunite with them, and really anybody from that period of my life since all the survivors have died. At The Met, I was thrilled to see that the placard actually said the name of the Fuller Brush man -- Dewald Strauss. He had a name!
I was a step closer to getting in touch with Alice's nephews. I was totally blown away, though, when I went to the Gift Shop and saw this book written by Alice's nephew, Jerry Strauss. It actually talked about our trip to The Whitney with his Aunt Alice in 2000!!!
It also gave more background about his father and Aunt. His Aunt Alice had sponsored Dewald in the 1940s. She worked as a domestic servant at the time for a wealthy family in the Bronx. She made $60 a week. in an affidavit to the government, she said she
supported herself on $10/m and would use the rest of it to support her brother. It worked! She got him over. He'd been here only 2 years before enlisting in the army. He was sent back to Germany as a soldier in the US Army. Naturally he was fearful of getting caught --
a German Jew who'd escaped a concentration camp and now back in Germany fighting in a US Army uniform. He fought 100 miles from his hometown. And in the Battle of the Bulge. He was wounded but then sent back to the frontline. In 1946 he was honorably discharged w/ a purple heart.
In the car home from The Met I was already texting with Jerry and then we spoke on the phone that night, reminiscing about our outing in 2000 and Aunt Alice telling everybody "That's my brother That's my brother." He sent me a link to the Ted Talk he did about it. Can't believe
in all my googling of Fuller Brush Man I never came upon it.
I can't say enough about this show, book and tedtalk. And I'm so glad that the quiet heroics of Alice Fraser
are also on display.
I sent Jerry this thread and he loved it. He also said he’d gotten up to speed on my career and told me “I know Aunt Alice would be so proud of you.” 😭
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
One thing i get asked a lot is if reforming Section 230 will result in a spate of new lawsuits.
The question assumes 1) lawsuits are a bad thing and 2) a bunch of new lawsuits = frivolous new lawsuits.
Reforming Section 230 hopefully WILL result in new lawsuits. That's a good thing. Because there are a ton of people who've suffered serious harms -- CSAM, sextortion, wrongful death of loved ones -- as a result of some specific tech platforms.
Imagine if there was a law that you couldn't sue car companies and that law was finally lifted. You can imagine that people who were in accidents because of faulty breaks, exploding airbags, and no seatbelts, would want their day in court.
This is the most clear-headed, fresh and readable piece on #Section230 I've ever read. About the past, present, and possible future. Best is his discussion of the alternate history if 230 never passed Expert work, @GiladEdelman@WIRED
Though this was not the focus of the piece it was truly refreshing for somebody to finally acknowledge the tactic used by many of the 230 defenders -- to belittle anybody who dares question or litigate against 230.
The defenders say we don't understand or we're too stupid to get it or say something flippant and untrue like "the only reason you can post your criticism of section 230 is because of section 230." You can't feel too sorry for the defenders. They're on the side of the powerful.
Today my client, @RepKatieHill, lost against perverted Daily Mail, a website that peddles in humiliation and monetizes sexual privacy invasions of women.
DM said, and the court agreed, that Katie's nudes were their free speech.
We think the appellate court will disagree. 1/
The court dismissed Katie's civil case at the earliest stage on anti-SLAPP grounds which is intended for nuisance defamation lawsuits against legit publications.
This is maybe the first time an Anti-SLAPP has been used to throw out a nonconsensual pornography civil suit. 2/
Dismissing Katie Hill’s case on ANTI-SLAPP grounds sets a dangerous precedent for victims of nonconsensual pornography everywhere. Anybody who dares enter the public eye should now have legitimate concern that old nude and sexual images can be shared 3/
@YaelEisenstat Well, I ended a 4 month relationship with a frightening person who decided he would spend the rest of his life destroying mine. This included non-stop texts and emails and fb messages threatening me, my family, my friends, co-workers, parents, parents’ friends.
@YaelEisenstat He’d tell people I was a drug addict, anorexic, pregnant, involved in scandals with judges, a whore, sleeping with cops. He’d email me my own naked pics and vids and tell me I didn’t even want to know who he’d bcc’ed. False claims to the irs against my family members,
@YaelEisenstat Would show up at my apartment, said he’d hacked into my work computer and gmail, tried to get my super to let him into my apartment. Then came the legal stuff —when I got a restraining order, he cross petitioned. He’d sue me in small claims, civil court for bizarre things
CW
Here is a 2012 @Reuters series by @mega2e about the thriving online market of "re-homing" adopted children. Big surprise about who wants unwanted children. Pedophiles.
A FB post for a Californian tries to rehome a Russian 13 yo boy who has displayed sexually aggressive behavior. And a Floridian wants to unload an 11 yo Russian girl "who has FAS with some sexual interest." 2/
The article explains that overseas adoptions into the US had become strict, slow and expensive.And the internet paved the way for interstate transfer of children -- private, same-day, and free. Scrutinizing the new parents, is left to the parents eager to unload the kid. 3/
Victims of child sexual abuse material can sue. 18 USC 2255
And Kellyanne, there's no "Alternative Facts" defense when it comes to child pornography. #THREAD 1/
Claudia says KA likely obtained the image when KA confiscated Claudia's phone. And she believes KA kept them for a rainy day. Claudia expressed disbelief that KA would have intentionally posted them and conjectures that maybe KA was hacked. 2/
However, the intentional publication isn't a necessary factor b/c it seems clear that KA would have first knowingly distributed and reproduced them for herself and then knowingly retained them. All in violation of 18 USC 2252A. 3/