One response, as below, is that we should mix vaccinated and unvaccinated in order to reduce the probability of infection in the latter (i.e., indirect protection or herd immunity)
This might be a good strategy insofar as unvaccinated people want to be vaccinated but just haven't had access yet - it protects them until they get vaccinated
3/
However, in the long-term, the level of herd immunity is a combination of vaccine-derived immunity and post-infection immunity (including post-vaccination infections)
For next (northern) winter, we arguably want this level as high as possible to reduce hospital pressures
4/
If #covid19 is not about to be eliminated from high incidence countries, and not everyone chooses to get vaccinated, it might be better for long-term public health to *promote* the spread of the virus during summer (as some have argued we should have done last year)
5/
This would have two results:
(1) Infections among the intentionally unvaccinated result in immunity (and occur in summer when the health system is least under pressure, which is good for these people and others), contributing to herd immunity next winter
6/
and (2), as I have previously noted, post-vaccination infections might provide a net long-term public health benefit by "boosting" the immunity of vaccinated individuals, including against currently circulating variants
So in summary - more spread of #covid19 in 2021 northern summer in highly vaccinated populations might be a good thing in terms of long-term herd immunity levels and future winter pressure on hospitals
8/
There are of course lots of caveats, including the need to protect the unintentionally unvaccinated until they have access (see post 3), as well as questions of whether public health should stop trying to segregate society & interfere with seasonal viral epidemiology...
FIN
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
To take the most obvious example, multiple high-income country regulators have restricted the use of the AstraZeneca vaccine in children and young adults
This is because the risks outweigh the direct individual benefits
Some people look at the figure above and say it doesn't include other things like longcovid, but there is precious little evidence that longcovid is common/severe in healthy children or young healthy adults (despite a lot of unverified claims about this)
@COVID_questions@bergerbell@pgodfreysmith@NahasNewman@WesPegden Regarding India, I first noted in July 2020 that we would eventually see bad news due to comorbidites (in the context of poverty and inequality), but that overall deaths per capita would be limited by the low population age - similar to current events
The above is an example of how scientists and journal editors could better communicate findings and risks
The widespread and baseless fears that there would not be immunity to #covid19 could have been reduced, rather than increased, by more careful reporting of the same data
From the same study:
~50% of people infected with endemic coronaviruses still have higher levels of antibodies after 4 years
No reason to think that #covid19 would be wildly different
(antibodies don't necessarily = clinical protection, but still good data)