Centralised stables will be increasingly regulated and restricted. Decentralised stables are the endgame and will grow to become one of the largest verticals in DeFi
I believe $UST is the only truly decentralised stablecoin operating at scale
Thread 👇
1/ Stablecoins have become the backbone of DeFi, with nearly $100b in cumulative market cap
Unfortunately, over 70% of this is in centralised alternatives like USDT and USDC
2/ Centralised stablecoins are IOUs for dollars held in a bank account attached to a legal entity
Not only do users face counterparty risk with issuers, they also face potential censorship by nation states as legal entities can be coerced and bank accs frozen
3/ This is not just academic. Circle has already blacklisted multiple USDC wallets
Any protocol which relies on USDC as part of LPs or as collateral inherits its vulnerabilities. The consequences of blacklisting would be potential protocol insolvency
It’s clear to me that centralised stablecoins will increasingly become more regulated and restricted. As they do, they will push the crypto industry towards decentralised stablecoins
This is one of the largest TAMs in crypto
5/ Unfortunately, existing decentralised stables are either not stable or they’re collateralised by centralised, censorable collateral and thus inherit its vulnerabilities
@makerDAO’s $DAI is currently backed ~40% by USDC and are looking to increase this further
6/ While $FRAX is a clever mechanism, it's also backed 86% by USDC
On the other hand, the only ones not backed by centralised collateral (AMPL, ESD, DSD, BSD) have completely failed to maintain their peg
All except $UST
7/ $UST is the only decentralised stablecoin which has managed to maintain its peg while not being backed by centralised collateral
It has done this by building actual demand for its stablecoin, initially via Chai and recently via TeFi
8/ To understand how Terra achieved this we have to understand how algo stables work
An algo stable is inherently capital efficient since no external collateral is required. The tradeoff is higher blow-up risk via reflexivity on the downside: the so-called “death spiral”
9/ Most algo stables try and address the death spiral via mechanism design, creating incentives for long-term believers to come in and stabilize the system by buying coupons/bonds
These attempts have thus far all failed
10/ Mechanisms can help the death loop (LUNA increases tax rate on txs + cashflows to stakers when UST < $1), but the key is creating real demand for the stable
At this point, a bear market is just a bull market in stablecoins (ht @samkazemian); counter-cylicality is achieved
11/ Terra built demand for $UST first via Chai and recently via TeFi which, while under the radar on CT, now boasts >$2B TVL
This includes key primitives for decentralised stables,
savings account (@anchor_protocol), UST-backed synths (@mirror_protocol) and DEX (Terraswap)
12/ The weekend of May 15th was a tough test for all LUNAtics with $UST breaking down to $0.94 before regaining the peg
However, there were also some extremely bullish takeaways for me👇
13/ On the demand side:
UST TVL on Anchor kept increasing throughout the sell-off, showing many already see Anchor’s $aUST savings account as their “safe haven” asset
This is massive for an algo stable which relies
14/ On the mechanism side, we learned that:
🌒We need more on-chain liquidity for $LUNA
🌒Anchor liquidations need to improve
🌒Dependence on bLUNA in Anchor must be mitigated (e.g. adding other assets like bETH and bSOL)
...and much more
15/ No mechanism will be perfect from the get-go. The key is to back a smart, proactive community that can come together to analyze what happened and adapt
From my POV, the incredible LUNA community response has proven they can do this
16/ Most importantly, the fact that $UST survived one of the worst weeks in crypto history and is back at peg shows resiliency and adds "Lindy value" to the system
How many other uncollateralised algo stables can say the same? None
17/ At a $2B FDV, $LUNA combines a bet on the leading decentralised stablecoin + the 3rd largest Layer 1 blockchain by TVL
It is also by far the cheapest L1 by $ of TVL
Hard to find more asymmetric R/R in this market
Disclaimers:
Algo stablecoins are still an experiment. Invest at your own peril
Delphi Ventures holds $LUNA and $ANC. I personally hold $LUNA
None of this is investment advice
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
We've already received a lot of great entries for the #deficonnected hackathon
In case you're still looking for inspiration, I've put together a wishlist of ideas that no one is yet building on Terra (as far as I know)
Thread 👇
(1)Terra name service (TNS)
Human readable names for the Terra network associated to Terra addresses. Essential infra for mainstream adoption
(2) Terra Push Notifications
Allowing push notifications to Terra wallet addresses
(3) Etherscan for Terra - Self explanatory
(4) Data infrastructure on Terra - Making it easy to query data from the Terra blockchain and major dApps (Terraswap, @mirror_protocol , @anchor_protocol ) and create dashboards. Think Graph Protocol / Dune Analytics for Terra
Everyone I introduce to the space starts off with 0-10% of their net worth invested and ends up with >50%. Even their cash moves to stables
Other than aggressive regulation, I don’t see anything TradFi can do to reverse this trend
TradFi is a government sanctioned monopoly where:
- one entity (central bank) mints the cash
- a few government licensed entities (banks) intermediate the way this cash is distributed to individuals
Like all monopolies, it’s structurally inefficient
TradFi:
- Highest “risk-free” yield available to most people is <1%
- Riddled with frictions like KYC/AML, awful bank UXs and general lack of innovation
- Your money is custodied by bankrupt banks and seizable by insolvent governments
- Opaque
On November 10th, @Delphi_Digital put forth a proposal for to fundamentally revise @AaveAave's current token architecture
We received incredible feedback from the community and are thrilled to present V2 of our proposal which incorporates much of this insight
Thread👇
1/ Before diving into our proposal it's important to understand how the current Aave Safety Module (SM) works
The SM is an insurance product which underwrites all risks (SC, oracle and liquidation) for all users of Aave protocol
As an insurance product, it has a few flaws
2/ Because insurance is bundled in with Aave's money markets, it's impossible to compute cover demand, pricing, capacity or how much to pay underwriters
Any new money market added is also automatically insured by the SM, introducing unlimited contagion and systemic risk