Why I'm bullish $LUNA 🌒

Centralised stables will be increasingly regulated and restricted. Decentralised stables are the endgame and will grow to become one of the largest verticals in DeFi

I believe $UST is the only truly decentralised stablecoin operating at scale

Thread 👇
1/ Stablecoins have become the backbone of DeFi, with nearly $100b in cumulative market cap

Unfortunately, over 70% of this is in centralised alternatives like USDT and USDC
2/ Centralised stablecoins are IOUs for dollars held in a bank account attached to a legal entity

Not only do users face counterparty risk with issuers, they also face potential censorship by nation states as legal entities can be coerced and bank accs frozen
3/ This is not just academic. Circle has already blacklisted multiple USDC wallets

Any protocol which relies on USDC as part of LPs or as collateral inherits its vulnerabilities. The consequences of blacklisting would be potential protocol insolvency

theblockcrypto.com/linked/102761/…
4/ The march of regulation is one-way

It’s clear to me that centralised stablecoins will increasingly become more regulated and restricted. As they do, they will push the crypto industry towards decentralised stablecoins

This is one of the largest TAMs in crypto
5/ Unfortunately, existing decentralised stables are either not stable or they’re collateralised by centralised, censorable collateral and thus inherit its vulnerabilities

@makerDAO’s $DAI is currently backed ~40% by USDC and are looking to increase this further
6/ While $FRAX is a clever mechanism, it's also backed 86% by USDC

On the other hand, the only ones not backed by centralised collateral (AMPL, ESD, DSD, BSD) have completely failed to maintain their peg

All except $UST
7/ $UST is the only decentralised stablecoin which has managed to maintain its peg while not being backed by centralised collateral

It has done this by building actual demand for its stablecoin, initially via Chai and recently via TeFi
8/ To understand how Terra achieved this we have to understand how algo stables work

An algo stable is inherently capital efficient since no external collateral is required. The tradeoff is higher blow-up risk via reflexivity on the downside: the so-called “death spiral”
9/ Most algo stables try and address the death spiral via mechanism design, creating incentives for long-term believers to come in and stabilize the system by buying coupons/bonds

These attempts have thus far all failed
10/ Mechanisms can help the death loop (LUNA increases tax rate on txs + cashflows to stakers when UST < $1), but the key is creating real demand for the stable

At this point, a bear market is just a bull market in stablecoins (ht @samkazemian); counter-cylicality is achieved
11/ Terra built demand for $UST first via Chai and recently via TeFi which, while under the radar on CT, now boasts >$2B TVL

This includes key primitives for decentralised stables,
savings account (@anchor_protocol), UST-backed synths (@mirror_protocol) and DEX (Terraswap)
12/ The weekend of May 15th was a tough test for all LUNAtics with $UST breaking down to $0.94 before regaining the peg

However, there were also some extremely bullish takeaways for me👇
13/ On the demand side:

UST TVL on Anchor kept increasing throughout the sell-off, showing many already see Anchor’s $aUST savings account as their “safe haven” asset

This is massive for an algo stable which relies
14/ On the mechanism side, we learned that:

🌒We need more on-chain liquidity for $LUNA
🌒Anchor liquidations need to improve
🌒Dependence on bLUNA in Anchor must be mitigated (e.g. adding other assets like bETH and bSOL)

...and much more
15/ No mechanism will be perfect from the get-go. The key is to back a smart, proactive community that can come together to analyze what happened and adapt

From my POV, the incredible LUNA community response has proven they can do this

16/ Most importantly, the fact that $UST survived one of the worst weeks in crypto history and is back at peg shows resiliency and adds "Lindy value" to the system

How many other uncollateralised algo stables can say the same? None
17/ At a $2B FDV, $LUNA combines a bet on the leading decentralised stablecoin + the 3rd largest Layer 1 blockchain by TVL

It is also by far the cheapest L1 by $ of TVL

Hard to find more asymmetric R/R in this market
Disclaimers:

Algo stablecoins are still an experiment. Invest at your own peril

Delphi Ventures holds $LUNA and $ANC. I personally hold $LUNA

None of this is investment advice

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with José Maria Macedo

José Maria Macedo Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ZeMariaMacedo

28 Apr
Yield Farming is underestimated

I believe it represents the birth of a new industry, with farmers becoming a new kind of market participant

@AlphaFinanceLab is the go-to platform for smart farmers and V2 only reinforces this

Thread 👇
1/ But first of all, what even is Yield Farming?

At its simplest, YF involves a project distributing tokens directly to users for taking some on-chain action

It makes sense because it allows projects to reward users for taking actions that benefit the protocol
2/ Seen another way, YF dilutes passive tokenholders in favour of active holders that contribute to the project in some way

Over time, it results in user-owned projects, concentrating token ownership in the hands of MVP community members
Read 19 tweets
15 Apr
We've already received a lot of great entries for the #deficonnected hackathon

In case you're still looking for inspiration, I've put together a wishlist of ideas that no one is yet building on Terra (as far as I know)

Thread 👇
(1)Terra name service (TNS)

Human readable names for the Terra network associated to Terra addresses. Essential infra for mainstream adoption

(2) Terra Push Notifications

Allowing push notifications to Terra wallet addresses

(3) Etherscan for Terra - Self explanatory
(4) Data infrastructure on Terra - Making it easy to query data from the Terra blockchain and major dApps (Terraswap, @mirror_protocol , @anchor_protocol ) and create dashboards. Think Graph Protocol / Dune Analytics for Terra
Read 9 tweets
13 Apr
Crypto is a liquidity blackhole

Everyone I introduce to the space starts off with 0-10% of their net worth invested and ends up with >50%. Even their cash moves to stables

Other than aggressive regulation, I don’t see anything TradFi can do to reverse this trend
TradFi is a government sanctioned monopoly where:

- one entity (central bank) mints the cash
- a few government licensed entities (banks) intermediate the way this cash is distributed to individuals

Like all monopolies, it’s structurally inefficient
TradFi:

- Highest “risk-free” yield available to most people is <1%
- Riddled with frictions like KYC/AML, awful bank UXs and general lack of innovation
- Your money is custodied by bankrupt banks and seizable by insolvent governments
- Opaque
Read 7 tweets
30 Dec 20
On November 10th, @Delphi_Digital put forth a proposal for to fundamentally revise @AaveAave's current token architecture

We received incredible feedback from the community and are thrilled to present V2 of our proposal which incorporates much of this insight

Thread👇
1/ Before diving into our proposal it's important to understand how the current Aave Safety Module (SM) works

The SM is an insurance product which underwrites all risks (SC, oracle and liquidation) for all users of Aave protocol

As an insurance product, it has a few flaws
2/ Because insurance is bundled in with Aave's money markets, it's impossible to compute cover demand, pricing, capacity or how much to pay underwriters

Any new money market added is also automatically insured by the SM, introducing unlimited contagion and systemic risk
Read 15 tweets
16 Dec 20
Crypto investing is hard.

In yesterday's daily, I covered the framework I use to analyse crypto investment opportunities

I then use this framework to show why I believe decentralised insurance as a sector is relatively undervalued compared to the DEX sector

Thread

👇
1/ Unlike traditional investors, investors in the crypto space must analyse and underwrite a series of stacked risks when investing in projects
2/

👉 Will the project create value and attract users?

👉 Will the project be able to capture value from those users and establish a long-term, defensible moat?

👉 Will the value captured accrue to the token?
Read 26 tweets
7 Dec 20
Following the launch of @AaveAave v2, an ARC has been posted to gather feedback around proposed Safety Module design. This includes:

👉 Slashing
👉 Incentives for stakers
👉 BPT staking

For his first daily, our new analyst @JonathanErlichL discusses these changes

Thread

👇
Slashing and staking incentives are essential parts of the SM and we didn't spend much time on these

Instead, we focus on the more controversial point of introducing allowing SM stakers to stake 80/20 $AAVE / $ETH pool BPT tokens in addition to $AAVE
We argue this is a necessary change, breaking the vicious cycle that can emerge as a result of Shortfall Events

Price falls --> Traders try to front-run $AAVE auction / mint --> Price declines more --> auction/mint gets more expensive Image
Read 9 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(