Trafficking and belief in the Big Lie isn’t a new virus infecting the American psyche.

It’s an evolution of disbelief that Isaac Asimov identified in his 21 January 1980 essay, “A Cult of Ignorance”, published in Newsweek.

🧵 follows

justinclark.org/blog/the-anti-…
<< It’s hard to quarrel with that ancient justification of the free press: “America’s right to know.” It seems almost cruel to ask, ingenuously, “America’s right to know what, please? Science? Mathematics? Economics? Foreign languages?”
🧵
None of those things, of course . In fact, one might well suppose that the popular feeling is that Americans are a lot better off without any of that tripe.

There is a cult of ignorance in the United States, and there always has been. The strain of anti-intellectualism…
… has been a constant thread winding its way through our political and cultural life, nurtured by the false notion that democracy means that “my ignorance is just as good as your knowledge.”
Politicians have routinely striven to speak the language of Shakespeare and Milton as ungrammatically as possible in order to avoid offending their audiences by appearing to have gone to school. Thus, Adlai Stevenson, who incautiously allowed intelligence …
… and learning and wit to peep out of his speeches, found the American people flocking to a Presidential candidate who invented a version of the English language that was all his own and that has been the despair of satirists ever since.
George Wallace, in his speeches, had, as one of his prime targets, the “pointy-headed professor,” and with what a roar of approval that phrase was always greeted by his pointy-headed audience.
BUZZWORDS: Now we have a new slogan on the part of the obscurantists: “Don’t trust the experts!” Ten years ago, it was “Don’t trust anyone over 30.” But the shouters of that slogan found that the inevitable alchemy of the calendar converted them to the untrustworthiness of the…
…over-30, and, apparently, they determined never to make that mistake again. “Don’t trust the experts!” is absolutely safe. Nothing, neither the passing of time nor exposure to information, will convert these shouters to experts in any subject that might conceivably be useful.
We have a new buzzword, too, for anyone who admires competence, knowledge, learning and skill, and who wishes to spread It around. People like that are called “elitists” That’s the funniest buzzword ever invented because people who are not members of the intellectual elite…
…don’t know what an “elitist” is, or how to pronounce the word. As soon as someone shouts “elitist” it becomes clear that he or she is a closet elitist who is feeling guilty about having gone to school.
All right, then, forget my ingenuous question. America’s right to know does not include knowledge of elitist subjects. America’s right to know involves something we might express vaguely as “what’s going on.” America has the right to know “what’s going on” in the courts, in…
…Congress, in the White House, in industrial councils, in the regulatory agencies, in labor unions—in the seats of the mighty, generally.

Very good, I’m for that, too. But how are you going to let people know all that?

Grant us a free press, and a corps of independent and…
…fearless investigative reporters, comes the cry, and we can be sure that the people will know.

Yes, provided they can read!

As it happens, reading is one of those elitist subjects I have been talking about, and the American public, by and large, in their distrust of experts..
…and in their contempt for pointy-headed professors, can’t read and don’t read.

To be sure, the average American can sign his name more or less legibly, and can make out the sports headlines — but how many nonelitist Americans can, without undue difficulty read as many as…
…a thousand consecutive words of small print, some of which may be trisyllabic?

Moreover, the situation is growing worse. Reading scores in the schools decline steadily. The highway signs, which used to represent elementary misreading lessons…
…(“Go Slo,” “Xroad”) are steadily being replaced by little pictures to make them internationally legible and incidentally to help those who know how to drive a car but, not being pointy-headed professors, can’t read.

Again, in television commercials, there are frequent …
…printed messages. Well, keep your eyes on them and you’ll find out that no advertiser ever believes that anyone but an occasional elitist can read that print. To ensure that more than this mandarin minority gets the message, every word of it is spoken out loud by the announcer.
HONEST EFFORT: If that is so, then how have Americans got the right to know? Grant that there are certain publications that make an honest effort to tell the public what they should know, but ask yourselves how many actually read them.
There are 200 million Americans who have inhabited schoolrooms at some time in their lives and who will admit that they know how to read (provided you promise not to use their names and shame them before their neighbors), but most decent periodicals believe they are doing…
…amazingly well if they have circulations of half a million. It may be that only 1 per cent — or less — of Americans make a stab at exercising their right to know. And if they try to do anything on that basis they arc quite likely to be accused of being elitists.
I contend that the slogan “America’s right to know” is a meaningless one when we have an ignorant population, and that the function of a free press is virtually zero when hardly anyone can read.

What shall we do about it?
We might begin by asking ourselves whether ignorance is so wonderful after all, and whether it makes sense to denounce “elitism.”
I believe that every human being with a physically normal brain can learn a great deal and can be surprisingly intellectual. I believe that what we badly need is social approval of learning and social rewards for learning.
We can all be members of the intellectual elite and then, and only then, will a phrase like “America’s right to know” and, indeed, any true concept of democracy. have any meaning. >>

— Isaac Asimov
Newsweek Magazine
21 January 21 1980
Page 19

aphelis.net/wp-content/upl…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with ⚡️Kathy E Gill | Get vaccinated, wear a mask!

⚡️Kathy E Gill | Get vaccinated, wear a mask! Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @kegill

8 Jun
To capture the financial reality of the richest Americans, ProPublica compared how the 25 richest Americans paid in taxes each year to how much Forbes estimated their wealth grew in that same time period. Groundbreaking analysis.

propublica.org/article/the-se…
ProPublica asked every person whose tax information is described to comment; “all said they had paid the taxes they owed.” Which is true by the letter of the law but not by any concept of fairness or morals.
As the @nytimes notes: the US tax system is rigged in its emphasis on taxing labor differently (more harshly) than it does income from wealth. We need a wealth tax for expediency + increase in corporate rates (I’d take Reagan’s) but we truly need overhaul.
Read 4 tweets
8 Jun
SO WHY were rank-and-file unprepared?
Capitol Police had seen comments on a pro-Trump website about the Capitol's tunnel system and that encouraged demonstrators to bring weapons to subdue members of Congress and police and to reverse the presidential election's results.
Here’s the Senate bipartisan report on US Capitol Police and #January6thInsurrection

rules.senate.gov/news/press-rel…
Read 4 tweets
7 Jun
False public comments designed to manipulate stock are illegal, that is, not protected speech.

WTH aren’t these lies in the same non-protected speech as that in Brandenburg v. Ohio, 395 U.S. 444 (1969)?
The government CAN punish inflammatory speech “where such advocacy is directed to inciting or producing imminent lawless action and is likely to incite or produce such action.”

Do we really need any more proof of incitement after #January6th ?
After all, ‘communist’ leaders from the 1950s were tried, convicted & imprisoned. The Brandenburg case (he was a leader in the Ohio Ku Klux Klan) did not touch Dennis v. United States (1951), which had upheld convictions of non-imminent-threat speech. mtsu.edu/first-amendmen…
Read 5 tweets
7 Jun
Promising research into metastatic #breastcancer from the UK in @Nature

The FDA-approved antibiotic Bedaquiline (for multi-drug resistant tuberculosis) “downregulated ATP5F1C expression in vitro and prevented spontaneous metastasis in vivo”

nature.com/articles/s4141…
Bedaquiline prevented “spontaneous metastasis in a xenograft model, without affecting tumor growth, or inducing significant toxicity… consistent with the idea that ATP is a functional biomarker of metastasis.”
Small study: 12 female patients with a diagnosis of invasive breast carcinoma. Samples of lymph node metastasis (5) or distant metastasis alone (6). One sample included the primary tumor; axillary lymph nodal metastasis; plus skin and the liver metastases.
Read 4 tweets
6 Jun
Kemp’s letter belongs with each-and-every public statement made by southerners on slavery when the south seceded.

Confederates lost the battle but sure as hell are winning the war.
Southerner secessionists vehemently objected to Lincoln’s election as President. They blamed northerners but did not claim the election was stolen. They relied upon a different Big Lie, the lie that slavery was a natural state for negros and blessed by the Creator.
Alexander H. Stephen, VP, Confederate States of America; March 21, 1961
“our new government['s] foundations are laid…upon the great truth that the negro is not equal to the white man; that slavery subordination to the superior race is his natural and normal condition.” Image
Read 15 tweets
31 May
Why is this treasonous call not in major news today?
I know it’s a holiday weekend…. so digital-only media/platforms must keep the story alive… like blogs did when Sen Trent Lott celebrated Strom Thurmond’s legacy of White supremacy on his 100th birthday, December 5, 2002.
Sen. Trent Lott resigned as majority leader on December 20, 2002, due in no small part to the burgeoning political blogging ecosystem.

Full paper, WWW2004, May 17–22, 2004, New York, NY
academia.edu/1439316/How_ca…
Keep sharing these stories and videos. @VICE has a rundown. In addition to Flynn’s treason … we have a Roger Stone advisor calling for Hillary Clinton to be executed.

vice.com/en/article/n7b…
Read 9 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(