1. Yesterday on @BretWeinstein's podcast, Robert Malone, inventor of the mRNA vaccine, told the world that the spike protein is indeed opening up the blood brain barrier. This should lead to a redefinition of both COVID-19 and vaccine adverse events. I will explain...
2. Coronaviruses never previously caused all the kinds of damage we have seen. It seems almost certain now that the spiked protein is itself responsible for much of what we call C19 and also vaccine adverse events.
3. We should then be talking about something like COVID-type-1 and COVID-type-2 illnesses. The SARS-CoV-2 virus causes both, but those that overlap with the vaccines might be defined as the type 2.
4. This is the framework that opens up the conversation. It allows for us to more easily discuss and frame risk-benefit analysis...in the face of none EVER being providing by manufacturers or the FDA or anyone (which is itself criminal).
5. This understanding may help doctors more easily analyze and record adverse events seen in their patients. There are more than most people realize. @stkirsch estimates 200,000 to 1,000,000 people seriously harmed by the vaccines (including those who have died).
6. And most importantly, this understanding can help people make vaccine decisions for themselves.

If my proposed redefinition of COVID-19 into two types is off base, give me your best argument as to why.
7. Now, let's talk about vaccines. Yesterday I met Bree Petersson who was excluded from the AZ trial after having awful adverse reactions.
8. Under my redefinition, she should have been counted as a COVID-19 case! And this is crucial, because those kinds of data exclusions overwhelm the effect size in some of the trial. Here is from the Pfizer report (Dec 10):
9. Such lopsided data exclusions have a p-value that breaks Excel, as I just discovered. Had even a fraction of these cases been counted as COVID-19, the report could not have claimed 90+ percent efficacy!
10. In fact, the vaccines might have been noted as harmful from the start.
11. Even worse---excluding those who had severe adverse events might have excluded those who are at the highest risk of COVID-19, whether or not you want to redefine it. This includes the roughly 50% of severe COVID-19 sufferers with a rare auto-interferon antibody disorder.
If you are unfamiliar with this fact, behold:

13. Am I the only one who thinks the vaccine trials look like rigging of a bogus result? The Type 1/2 redefinition should help us sort that out.
Twitter is already removing likes from this thread. Wow.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh

Keep Current with Rounding the Earth

Rounding the Earth Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!


Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @EduEngineer

9 Jun

1. Of the next 20 research papers examining effects of HCQ treatment of C19 patients, the majority show positive results.

2. Same bet for IVM.

(Since some studies are small, we ignore stat significance.)

I can go $5,000 apiece.

We can agree on an arbiter.
Who wants a piece?

We can define terms more precisely, of course. This is a tweet to get the ball rolling.
Disclaimer: I am involved (funded) in data collection and statistical analysis of the results for both medications.
Read 4 tweets
12 May
These words don't mean what you think they mean...

I'm not "anti-mask".

I'm "most common masks do very little for an aerosolized virus one-two-thousands the size of the pores" and "there really are trade-offs of health and communication" and "harassing people over this seems crazy".
I'm not "anti-vaxx".

I'm "I'd like to know the long term risks both for my person and also existential risks such as leaked evolutionary pressure that might make this thing go 'Spanish flu' for real this time" and "give me a cost-benefit analysis first" and "kids? Really?!"
Read 14 tweets
19 Dec 20
There is a strangely organized rumor going around that the AMA passed a resolution recognizing the efficacy of HCQ and calling on a reversal of its suppression. Unfortunately, that resolution was not passed, but I suggest the story is more interesting than that...
When you think about it, the resolution never had a chance of passing. Intuitively, we all know this. The AMA and Pharma are far too intertwined, and further with the government. Suggesting that the resolution could pass would be to suggest there was no opposition to begin with.
But here is the interesting part: Almost nobody, save for the few of us doing broad levels of research on the topic, knew to step in and correct the mistake. What does that mean?
Read 9 tweets
18 Dec 20
@Kevin_McKernan @BrunnerCreative @ScottAdamsSays @vgttrom @JamesTodaroMD There are 20 natural experiments, and in 19 of them, the nation starting to use HCQ saw mortality rates fall OR the nation stopping usage saw it rise relative to baseline.

I will drop some of my own graphs here...
@Kevin_McKernan @BrunnerCreative @ScottAdamsSays @vgttrom @JamesTodaroMD Portugal stopped using in late May while their CFR was tanking. A couple of weeks later that trend reversed (median days to death is 18.5).
Read 14 tweets
7 Nov 20
As a consistent third party voter living in a state that wasn't going to swing a close election, I don't vote R or D.

But this is the time to throw weight behind an investigation into the possibility of a stolen election. We must investigate the statistical evidence.
So, let us investigate the statistical evidence broadly and as a community. Carefully and honestly. Benford's law is a clever technique, but there is an underlying reason behind it that should be understood to best apply the fundamental test.
The reason behind it is that population pools grow exponentially, so they move through orders of magnitude at an invariant rate. If we take the logarithm, the results are then linear. Discarding the integer parts, the fraction parts should form a uniform distribution.
Read 8 tweets
2 Nov 20
1. This thread is a bit of comic relief from the pandemic.
2. Somewhere, out in the Ocean, a beautiful and thriving civilization spans the island of Pandemos. Larger in land size than Australia, you might miss it on a map, er, due to distortions in scale caused by Mercator projection.
3. The lush and resourceful Pandemos has allowed for the Pandemosians to engineer an amazing modern society.
Read 31 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!