1. Yesterday on @BretWeinstein's podcast, Robert Malone, inventor of the mRNA vaccine, told the world that the spike protein is indeed opening up the blood brain barrier. This should lead to a redefinition of both COVID-19 and vaccine adverse events. I will explain...
2. Coronaviruses never previously caused all the kinds of damage we have seen. It seems almost certain now that the spiked protein is itself responsible for much of what we call C19 and also vaccine adverse events.
3. We should then be talking about something like COVID-type-1 and COVID-type-2 illnesses. The SARS-CoV-2 virus causes both, but those that overlap with the vaccines might be defined as the type 2.
4. This is the framework that opens up the conversation. It allows for us to more easily discuss and frame risk-benefit analysis...in the face of none EVER being providing by manufacturers or the FDA or anyone (which is itself criminal).
5. This understanding may help doctors more easily analyze and record adverse events seen in their patients. There are more than most people realize. @stkirsch estimates 200,000 to 1,000,000 people seriously harmed by the vaccines (including those who have died).
6. And most importantly, this understanding can help people make vaccine decisions for themselves.
If my proposed redefinition of COVID-19 into two types is off base, give me your best argument as to why.
If my proposed redefinition of COVID-19 into two types is off base, give me your best argument as to why.
7. Now, let's talk about vaccines. Yesterday I met Bree Petersson who was excluded from the AZ trial after having awful adverse reactions.
8. Under my redefinition, she should have been counted as a COVID-19 case! And this is crucial, because those kinds of data exclusions overwhelm the effect size in some of the trial. Here is from the Pfizer report (Dec 10): 
9. Such lopsided data exclusions have a p-value that breaks Excel, as I just discovered. Had even a fraction of these cases been counted as COVID-19, the report could not have claimed 90+ percent efficacy!
10. In fact, the vaccines might have been noted as harmful from the start.
11. Even worse---excluding those who had severe adverse events might have excluded those who are at the highest risk of COVID-19, whether or not you want to redefine it. This includes the roughly 50% of severe COVID-19 sufferers with a rare auto-interferon antibody disorder.
13. Am I the only one who thinks the vaccine trials look like rigging of a bogus result? The Type 1/2 redefinition should help us sort that out.
@HeatherEHeying @richardursomd @btysonmd @FatEmperor @GeorgeFareed2 @stkirsch @raoult_didier @AlexBerenson @Covid19Crusher @drakchaurasia @drsimonegold @drbeen_medical @ClareCraigPath
Twitter is already removing likes from this thread. Wow.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
