This is a short thread on Japanese bulldozers in WW2.

There weren't many & they were small

My copy of Rikugun. Volume 2: Weapons of the Imperial Japanese Army & Navy Ground Forces 1937 - 1945 does not show a single Japanese bulldozer design.
1/ Image
There are a few hints about them on the internet.

In December 1942, the Imperial Japanese Navy commissioned Komatsu to produce heavy earthmovers for the purpose of building air bases.

See this link -- kenkenkikki.jp/museum/bulldoz…
2/ Image
Only 148 of the 5,000 kg Komatsu bulldozers were produced by the end of the war. Some were sent to the Philippines to build air bases

And note "Heavy" by Japanese standards compares to the 23 tons of a US D-8 bulldozer of 1943 vintage.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caterpill…
3/ Image
Even a "small" American D-4 Caterpillar tractor with bulldozer blade was massing 10 tons.

4/ Image
The Imperial Japanese Navy's Komatsu bulldozer was slightly more, mass-wise, at 5,000 kg than a Caterpillar D-2 at 7,420 to 8,536 pounds (3,366 to 3,872 kg).

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caterpill…
5/ Image
The real measure of Japan as an industrial power in WW2 wasn't it's battleships, so much as it's lack of bulldozers.

A single field in England in the summer of 1944 held more Allied earthmoving bulldozer capability than the Japanese built from 1937 - 1945.

/End Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Trent Telenko

Trent Telenko Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @TrentTelenko

14 Jun
This thread is another visit into the pyrrhic victory known as Operation Iceberg, the Apr 1945 invasion of Okinawa.

This thread is based on my Aug 2013 Chicagoboyz column "Technological Surprise & the Defeat of the 193rd Tank Battalion at Kakuzu Ridge"
chicagoboyz.net/archives/38455…
1/ XXIVth Corps 19 April 1945 ...This is the wreck of a M4 S...
On 19 April 1945, the US Army’s 27th Inf Div launched an attack against the Kakuza Ridge position held by the 32nd Army on Okinawa with the 193rd Tank Btn's 30 tanks, S.P. assault guns, and attached armored flame throwers from the 713th Flame Tank Btn.
2/ This is a 713th Flame Tank ...
When the battle was over, 22 of the 30 AFV had been destroyed in a coordinated ambush by Japanese AT- guns, artillery, mortars & suicide close assault teams. Among the dead was the commander of the 193rd, on whom blame was laid for attacking without infantry in close support.
3/ This is a detailed Fire Pla...The commander of the 193rd ...This is the description of ...
Read 25 tweets
11 Jun
@adam_tooze @gideonrachman A UH-60 Blackhawk has a radius of action of 368 miles with external stores system fuel tanks.

The Chinese have copied & improved on this helicopter as the Z-20.

It is 130-ish kilometers in the closest Chinese coast to the closest Taiwan coast.

thedrive.com/the-war-zone/5…
@adam_tooze @gideonrachman The Z-20 has a 5-blade rotor system and more powerful engines as well as auxiliary wing-like hardpoints attached to it, similar to the Lightweight Armament Support Structure (LASS) and External Stores Support System (ESSS) wings on the US Blackhawks.

thedrive.com/the-war-zone/3…
@adam_tooze @gideonrachman Essentially, a fleet of Z-20's with external stores can do 2 round trips from Mainland China to Taipei loaded with 11 troops per lift.

Or they can trade fuel for weapons and play assault gunship to support infantry air-landings.

A Chinese coup de main vs. Taiwan is now possible
Read 4 tweets
9 Jun
Alright, since the Bilge Pumps episode 52 is up, and I really didn't get a chance to go deep with US military 3D printing as is, versus what I see coming.

I'm going to drop a background thread here to do just that.

Note: long thread warning
1/
the-bilgepumps.simplecast.com/episodes/bilge…
3D Printing/Additive Mfg has been around for a while.

The four “foundational” patents for 3D/AM processes were issued one each in 1984 and 1986 with the remaining two in 1989.

Two National Science Foundation impacted 3D/AM patents were issued in 1987 and 1995. (See photo)
2/
RAND in 2017 identified seven different 3D/AM Processes for seven material classes.
3/
Read 31 tweets
8 Jun
This is a thread on Normandy/Overlord airpower, signals & invasion stripes.

There was a neat post by @militaryhistori about D-Day to D+1 airpower talking about how many aircraft sorties the Allies racked & stacked over Normandy 6-7 June 1945.


1/
I replied to it with four photo captures of how the airpower flew during the daylight hours of June 6, 1944.

It was a whole lotta planes!


2/
I wrote a thread dealing with all of the above over on the Chicagoboyz blog on 2019's 75th Anniversary of D-Day here:

How Allied Planes Got Their D-Day Invasion Stripes and other "Retro-High Tech" Secrets of the Normandy Invasion
chicagoboyz.net/archives/59917…
3/
Read 45 tweets
5 Jun
Paul Woodage's [@WW2TV] had a very nice video stream today with Kevin Hymel using information from his forthcoming book on Gen Patton.

This thread will expand on a piece of it regards Operation Huskey's friendly fire incident that killed 400 troops
1/
Operation Huskey's 2nd set of air drops resulted in 23 C-47 & C-53 troop carriers, & some gliders, being shot down with 400 US & UK paratroopers plus air crew aboard them. 
2/
amcmuseum.org/history/a-very… Image
The friendly fire incident was due to the lack of a plan for centralized control of fleet and the just landed shore based anti-aircraft weapons.

The Report of Allied Force Airborne Board on Operation “HUSKY” is online (link)
fold3.com/image/1/270149…
3/
Read 13 tweets
3 Jun
@TheDEWLine It's not just a matter of interceptors versus rockets.

It is also a matter of Israeli anti-tunnel sensors and sensor fusion from same.

Israeli drones overflying empty fields with magnetic anomaly detectors will pick up Hamas tunnels if they are running a lot of electricity...
@TheDEWLine ...to rocket manufacturing facilities.

This MAD sensor data can cue really powerful ground penetrating radars to determine the size of the underground voids associated with the traced electricity.

Then they can use AI to associate that with Hamas personnel movements in the
@TheDEWLine ...IDF version of Gorgon Stare wide angle video movement sensors to associate people with underground facilities.

This in turn cues Israeli Humint to get close to those people.

strategypage.com/htmw/htecm/art…
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(