2/ First, I agree glucose going up and down -- in and of itself -- is not inherently a mechanism of concern.
The key questions of interest are by how much and for how long -- and from this, can we determine if there is a dysregulation?
3/ I was listening earlier in a Clubhouse chat to @Dr__Guess discuss her recent study and how "all over the map" glucose levels were for these T2D patients -- which is unsurprising given the nature of the disease.
4/ I think most would agree there's likely a spectrum to T2D for many (if not most) people. Which is to say, progressive onset of T2D may be detectable where one is showing small signs of dysregulation before larger ones. Yes, much debate on exactly how we "get" to T2D...
5/ But there isn't much debate on the dysregulation itself -- hence the OGTT test being considered the gold standard (tho I'd argue the true gold standard is matching it alongside insulin testing per Kraft)
Having a CGM is, in a sense, like having an "always on" OGTT running.
6/ However, you don't need a CGM if you're willing to simply test your blood at the intervals intended with an over the counter glucometer.
That said, from my own experience with a CGM, there can still be a lot of variability depending on the meal, time of day, sleep, etc
7/ And that's the part that I think gets missed in this conversation between the two "sides":
Whether I were on a low or high carb diet, I do care if my postprandial glucose climbs to levels north of 140 and/or lingers at a high range for longer than 2 hours on a per meal basis
8/ I learned a lot of things were higher glycemic than I thought and could have only known due to the CGM.
I've never been diagnosed as full T2D (A1c only to 6.1 before heading back via #keto)
9/ Again, I know many, many people on high carb diets who handle carbs quite well, IMO
But would those same people find it curious if one particular meal had an unusual spike in glucose followed by a sustained level for many hours in a given circumstance and/or meal? I think so
10/ And it's those potential opportunities for course correction that I suspect could be very valuable in avoiding an onset of T2D.
That's why coming non-invasive wearables (fingers crossed, Apple Watch) could truly change the landscape, IMO.
11/ To be fair, it's certainly speculative given we don't have long term studies on non-diabetics (per @DBelardoMD's point). But definitely put me on the record for betting it will be a net gain overall -- particularly when we have the non-invasive wearables making it easier.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
2/ @BioLayne “… if you torture the data enough, you can get it to show what you would like it to show.”
This is actually a variation I was one of my favorite quotes of all time.👇
3/ it’s also very prescient in its timing. I was actually just talking with @NutritionMadeS3 yesterday, and why I tend to be more interested in studies that work off open or shared data sets given the level of transparency in the statistical instruments being used…
The majority of things I'd "take back" have more to do with my having a simplified version of certain concepts that I now much more about (and would present as such)
But I'll be hit up on those things that are more overtly incorrect...
2/ Probably the biggest is my originally saying "Low Density Lipoprotein's primary purpose" is to deliver fat for energy. I had meant it at the time as the class opposite HDL (thus, all ApoB). Sure, a few slides later I differentiate with VLDL, IDL, and LDL...
3/ But the more appropriate way to have stated the same thing would have been: "The primary purpose of ApoB-containing lipoproteins overall is to deliver fat-based energy."
However, I don't think I'd like this statement as much either given how ApoB impacts immune other mechs...
2/ Before getting started, note the coming #LMHRstudy will effectively be tackling much of these common considerations quite directly as we study #LMHRs who have considerably high #LDL from being fat-adapted with otherwise #CVD healthy metrics (See CitizenScienceFoundation.org)
3/ While not commonly known, another major carrier protein for chol is Albumin. It's typically considered in light of transporting NEFAs, but its binding sites can (and are) applied to many other lipids, including cholesterol. ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/P…
It’s a ironic, my bloodwork looks fine when I’m either keto (less than 25 net carbs) or low carb (25-100 net carbs).
I have a lot more choices when I am low-carb and the food experience is generally more pleasurable with more treats and greater variety…
2/ But in all that time outside of when I’m eating, I just typically feel better. More balanced, better focus, and on top of all of that, I find I simply think about food a lot less. While it’s fun to anticipate a good meal, it can also be an unhelpful distraction.
3/ It’s annoying to have to identify food that is satisfying, but not *too* satisfying. Food I can enjoy but won’t actively overeat. That’s pretty much everything super low carb that isn’t highly refined (I could definitely drink way too much heavy whipping cream “fat shakes”)
1/ An aside -- I'm working on a diet protocol of sorts. In a sense, I'm combining a number of techniques I've picked up from my experiments and seeing if it "works" for me. So far, it definitely has been. I'm nearly to the weight I was right before the Weight Gain Experiment
2/ As a little background, I was usually around 185-ish lb before that experiment, then after completing it and going back to keto, I started to average around 195 (I'm 6'3, btw, so BMI would be 24.4 at that level)
3/ I've chatted about this many times on the MMM (our member stream) with @siobhan_huggins, and have wondered if this was simply a new set point of sorts. Maybe it's the added stress, long hours, and not-so-great sleep schedule.
2/4 ... But this assumption also makes it that much harder for those who struggle with public anxiety to be open about their hardships.
Many consider Naomi to be the best in female tennis, which is why this has real potential to put a new spotlight on this challenge.
3/4 ... To be sure, I don't think it's as simple as allowing athletes to pass on any press of any kind in an international sport. But I do think it's possible this ultimately leads to policy changes that can be more accommodating to many like Naomi.