5 Receptors, any more?
Molecular mechanism of interaction between SARS-CoV-2 and host cells and interventional therapy researchgate.net/publication/35…
Sorry, I can't count properly, there are more than 5:
ACe2, Neuropilin 1, AXL, ASGR1, KREMEN1, Cellular heparan sulfate, CD147, DCL-SIGN, L-SIGN, MR, and MGL, maybe nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs) via gp120 motif
Anyone still counting?
12 or more! That is unusual...
The Chinese Academy of Sciences video was discovered by researchers investigating the origin of the pandemic who call themselves DRASTIC.
Digital archivist “Jesse” @uacjess found the Chinese Academy of Sciences Video while the group's co-ordinator, who goes by a pseudonym of “Billy Bostickson” for safety reasons, has long complained evidence bats were housed in the Wuhan laboratories.
2. Let's further think of this,
Weigh what convenience both of time & means
May fit us to our shape. If this should fail,
& that our drift look through our bad performance,
'Twere better no assayed. Therefore this project
Should have a back or second that might hold
3. April 2020
Online Discussion chaired by NAM President Victor Dzau
Jeremy Farrar, Wellcome Trust
Anthony S. Fauci NIH
Sanjay Gupta, CNN
George F. Gao, DG, China CDC
Susan R. Weiss
Richard J. Hatchett
Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations
1. Wuhan Institute of Virology and REMDESIVIR
(Patent and Paper)
Second analysis by Jian Kang, New York Medical College Associate Professor @jkssdk0907
The first analysis was posted yesterday here:
The National Natural Science Foundation of China
2. On February 4, 2020, the Wuhan Institute of Virology announced on its official website whiov.cas.cn/kyjz_105338/20… (now deleted) that on January 21, 2020, it had declared a Chinese invention patent on the "use of anti-2019 novel coronavirus" Remdesivir. archive.ph/88ecC
3. The experimental data that the application relied on was sent to Cell Research on January 25, 2020, and published as a Letter to the Editor on February 4th 2020 in the journal, Nature. (nature.com/articles/s4142…)
1. Jian Kang, a retired associate professor from New York Medical College, pointed out the following evidence supporting the Laboratory leak of the SARS-COV-2 Virus
2. The National Natural Science Foundation of China provided zero funding for the research on the origin and intermediate host of the SARS-Cov-2 virus, while the funding for research on the origin and intermediate host of the SARS-1 virus was nearly 2 million.
3. The main supporting evidence for a natural origin of SARS-COV- 2 is finding the intermediate host.
From the perspective of profit & loss, the biggest beneficiary of finding an intermediate host is China, to show that the virus comes from nature, not a man-made disaster.
2. via @ydeigin and @franciscodeasis
it’s a very disturbing paper if its findings are verified: not only SARS2 and RaTG13 have signs of genetic manipulation in yeast but SARS1 too.
WIV is known to have eyed yeast reverse genetic systems with interest (see attached WIV thesis
3. The Author has published quite a few interesting papers with 1870 citations. scholar.google.com/citations?user…
One on the Association between influenza vaccination rates and SARS-CoV-2 outbreak infection rates in OECD countries papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cf…