This article has so many huge logical holes that one could walk through them. I thank @SudheenKulkarni for sharing his thoughts. This needs an article. Some pets
As China’s Communist Party turns 100, Indian leaders would do well to learn from its success scroll.in/article/996921…
As China’s Communist Party turns 100, Indian leaders would do well to learn from its success scroll.in/article/996921…
Sudheendra ji acknowledges ‘some restrictions’ on citizens’ rights, human rights by #CPC100Years. His approval tells us he is fine with it. Will he approve the same in India? He fawns over proposed programme on Tiananmen Square, which is truly farcical - it’s sign of massacre
I have been to China. Its progress is stupendous and mind blowing. But, rebuilding of the cities and infrastructure is by displacement of millions without any recourse to law. Would he approve a much milder Land acquisition law that had to be abandoned?
Our ‘mixed economy’ socialism pulled us down till 1991. Liberalisation was 15 years after China, I think. After 1996, chaos of broken alliances disturbed economy. But, his bashing is reserved only for #Modi. I wish he had stuck to his academic approach, even if biased.
Does @SudheenKulkarni ji agree with Reservations or he wants a meritocracy of China? Let him respond categorically. Does he recommend 1party control like China? Does he agree with a single dominant community destroying all other identities as done in China. Sir, this is confusion
Some *points not pets.
Regrets. Auto spell charm of mobile keyboard.
Regrets. Auto spell charm of mobile keyboard.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
