#SupremeCourt hears an appeal challenging the Delhi HC order which allowed schools to collect annual fee from students with a 15% deduction on total fee due to unutilised facilities during the lockdown on account of COVID19
Sr Adv Shyam Divan: HC took guidance and gave benefits to students and parents. It reached an independent conclusion. Division bench will hear it on July 12. Single judge decided the case on merits and held executive decision as ultra vires
Divan: It took input from your earlier order which directed for a 15 percent deduction but this was something which was ought to be decided under Article 226 which the learned judge did
Sr Neeraj Kishan Kaul: We are agreeable to the division bench hearing it

Singh: I am only on the question of stay

Justice Khanwilkar: its between private school and student, how is state involved?
Sr Adv Singh: Delhi said 100 percent tuition fee school is recoverable but only annual charges etc was asked to be waived off

Justice Khanwilkar: Rajasthan case was not only decided on the basis of Disaster Management Act

SC: We are dismissing the SLP
Justice Khanwilkar: you argue before the division bench. State is not concerned here

Singh: lakhs and lakhs of parents will be affected. Please don't shut be out. Only respondent has been heard and not the petitioner. it is unheard in this court
Singh refers to the Rajasthan school fees judgment decided by the top court.
#supremecourt
Singh : there should be a stay, i am confining to that prayer. They straightaway applied the Rajasthan judgment mutatis mutandis.

SC: There is no question of harassment.

Singh: I have permitted tuition fee. What I’ve not permitted is annual charges. Please look into this
Singh: full tuition fee to be recovered

Justice Khanwilkar: we are not inclined
Justice Khanwikar: considering that division bench is hearing the matter on July 12. All contentions remain open and be raised before division bench dismissal of the petition does not reflect upon merits of the case.

#supremecourt
[COVID-19] Delhi private schools can continue to charge development, annual fees after Supreme Court refuses stay on Delhi High Court order

report by @DebayonRoy

#SupremeCourtofIndia #delhilockdown #SchoolFees

Read more here: bityl.co/7Ybx

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Bar & Bench

Bar & Bench Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @barandbench

29 Jun
#BombayHighCourt is hearing petition seeking door to door #CovidVaccine for the elderly and disabled citizens.

@CMOMaharashtra
@mybmc
Adv Dhruti Kapadia petitioner-in-person submits that #MaharashtraGovernment has submitted its affidavit.

She asks the Court to read para 5 as it important.

@DhrutiMKapadia

#COVID19 #BombayHighCourt
Kapadia raises objection to the paragraph stating that family doctors should take responsibility for treating AEFI.

#COVID19 #BombayHighCourt
Read 7 tweets
29 Jun
Narada Scam: Calcutta High Court 5-judge Bench to resume hearing in transfer plea by CBI

Track this thread for live updates.

#calcuttahighcourt #naradascam

@AITCofficial @FirhadHakim
The Supreme Court had on June 25 set aside the High Court order of June 9 refusing to take on record affidavits filed by @GhatakMoloy and @MamataOfficial

The court has remanded that issue back to HC to consider afresh.

#naradascam

barandbench.com/news/litigatio…
Bench assembles. Advocate General Kishore Dutta informs High Court of the Supreme Court order.

#naradascam #calcuttahighcourt
Read 27 tweets
29 Jun
#BombayHighCourt to hear clutch of petitions on various issues pertaining to #COVID19 management in #Maharashtra and availability of drugs to treat #mucormycosis.

Hearing before CJ Dipankar Datta and Justice GS Kulkarni.

@CMOMaharashtra
@mybmc
AG Anil Kumbhakoni and ASG Anil Singh appears for State and Central governments respectively.

Advocates Arshil Shah, Rajesh Inamdar, Simil Purohit, Ajinkya Udane appear for the petitioners.

@ArshilAjay
@rajinamdar22
@ajinkyaudaneadv
The Court will also hear application filed by #SonuSood seeking intervention on the ground that the orders being passed in the PILs may affect him and hence he is necessary party.

@SonuSood
Read 19 tweets
29 Jun
#MadrasHighCourt issues notice in plea moved by State BJP general secretary, Karu Nagarajan challenging 9-member committee formed by TN govt to study impact of NEET on students from socially backward classes. State to file counter in a week

@KaruNagarajan1 @bjp4tamilnadu
In interim order, HC noted petitioner's submission that in light of #SupremeCourt's Aug 2017 Judgment on #NEET, there is little room for State to set up committee to ascertain if NEET-based admission process has prejudicially affected socially backward students

#MadrasHighCourt
Advocate General R Shunmugasundaram submitted today that this is a policy decision backed by manifesto and the people's demand.

#MadrasHighCourt #NEET #TamilNadu
Read 5 tweets
29 Jun
Justice DY Chandrachud led bench of #SupremeCourt to hear plea by Kerala Govt seeking permission to withdraw cases against prominent CPI(M) leaders for vandalism in the Kerala Assembly in 2015 when the current ruling party in the State was in opposition @vijayanpinarayi
Plea is against a March 12, 2021 order of the Kerala High Court which had dismissed the State's petition against an order of rejection by the Chief Judicial Magistrate's Court seeking permission to withdraw prosecution against accused including sitting ministers.
Read about the plea here:

barandbench.com/news/litigatio…
Read 5 tweets
29 Jun
#SupremeCourt to hear a plea against the dismissal of a petition by the NGT which raised issues of anthropogenic pressures and over-exploitation of the Sambhar Lake which led to the mass death of over
18,000 migratory birds in the Sambhar Lake in November, 2019
NGT had dismissed the plea stating it was similar to a suo motu case the tribunal was hearing. However, the plea in #supremecourt contends that the case is different.
Plea highlights violation of the Ramsar Convention on Wetlands of International Importance, 1971, to which India is a signatory. The said enactment mandates ‘wise’ use of wetlands and special protection of Wetlands that have been designated as a ‘Ramsar’ site #supremecourt
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(