ποΈ Anti-COVID antibodies are present in breastmilk and would be predicted to be protective.
ποΈ Minimal transfer of vaccine mRNA.
More detail below... π§΅
The finding that anti-COVID antibodies make it into breast milk after vaccination is in line with findings from at least six other studies. Too many to post one by one, but you can find links to them here, under question 7.
This study uses a technique that concentrates the mRNA from the milk before looking for vaccine mRNA, allowing them to detect much lower levels than the other two papers. 6/
By doing this, can detect very low levels of vaccine mRNA transiently in the milk of 3 of their participants. The most they see is 2ng/mL or 2 parts per 1000,000,000. 7/
This is such a low level that on a sensitive assay, it might be contamination. But let's assume the authors have done all their negative controls and it's not. What does 2 parts per 1000,000,000 mean? Enough we should be worried? 8/
I'm going to assume that this audience is familiar with those syringes you use for giving babies Calpol. The whole syringe is 5mL (though if your baby is little, you will only be giving them half a syringe). 9/
Imagine taking that 5mL syringe of Calpol, squirting it into an Olympic (50m) pool, giving it a couple of days to mix and then taking the water/Calpol mixture. You wouldn't expect it to do much, would you?
That's 2 parts per 1000,000,000.
10/
We also have to remember that we don't expect the vaccine mRNA to do anything if it's taken in orally. If it did, we would administer it as an oral vaccine, rather than injected people (which almost everyone hates). 11/
So, by using a super-sensitive assay, it is possible to detect very very low levels of vaccine mRNA briefly in the milk of some people. 12/
But the levels are really very very low and I personally would be happy to keep on BF my baby - especially given the potentially protective effect of the antibodies.
Happy to chat, as always! 13/13
Cunningly, I totally failed to attach the paper to the top tweet. π€¦π»ββοΈ
Every day, I get emails from people who have noticed changes to their periods following the COVID vaccine. But we don't yet have enough information to know if this is really linked to the vaccine and, if so, how common it is. 2/
Since March, I have been saying "I'm sure someone is doing the kind of study that will find this out." I contacted some of the period tracking apps to see if they wanted to work with me on the kind of study that would find this out, but they weren't keen. 3/
@RealNormalPod@lisadunn1978 Great question! What you've just described there is called a "challenge study" and is sometimes done, eg for malaria vaccines. But in the case of COVID, since it's potentially fatal and there's no cure it was considered unethical. 1/
@RealNormalPod@lisadunn1978 In the trials, what they did was vaccinate half the participants and give the other half a placebo (either salt water or a different vaccine). Then they regularly tested everyone to see if the people who got the vaccine were less likely to get a positive test than the rest. 2/
@RealNormalPod@lisadunn1978 In fact, not all the trials did this. AZ did and Moderna sorta did but Pfizer only tested people when they got sick. This is why we spent some time when the vaccines were new going "we know it stops you getting sick, but we don't know if it stops you getting infected." 3/
What can vaccines on older platforms tell us about the side effects we might expect to see on the newer mRNA and adenovirus vector platforms? π§΅
This is something Iβm asked a lot at the moment, particularly because people want to know if itβs fair to compare the menstrual effects seen with HPV and flu vaccines with those seen with COVID19 vaccines, as I have in this (now oldish) thread. 2/
A lot of people are asking me if #COVID19 mRNA #vaccines build up in the ovaries. This is an idea that seems to have come from some data submitted by Pfizer to the Japanese government.
But is it true? Letβs dive in!
(But TLDR: no...) π§΅
Hereβs a machine-translated version of the document, so we can all see whatβs going on. The document describes the outcome of two kinds of experiments. 2/
First, they administered a version of the vaccine that encodes a glowing protein, luciferase, to mice. This allows us to see where the vaccine is making protein because⦠well... it glows! Please enjoy the glowing mice. 3/
@beverleyturner@toadmeister To tackle your first tweet first. I think you are talking about the data submitted by Pfizer to the Japanese regulator? That Bryan Brindle has recently had a lot to say about? It's here... 1/
@beverleyturner@toadmeister First, it's important to note that Bridle (oops, I gave him an "n" above!) is not the inventor of these vaccines. He is actually working on a rival vaccine.
But in any case, a lot of what he says just isn't true. I talk more about this here... 2/
@beverleyturner@toadmeister It's also worth noting that the biodistribution data we're talking about here is radiolabelled lipids, not (necessarily) vaccine. 3/
@toadmeister Morning Toby! Iβm the reproductive immunologist that is quoted in that Sunday Times article, here to provide a bit of context... 1/
@toadmeister The first thing to say is that Yellow Card is very good at detecting serious side effects that donβt usually happen in the absence of vaccination. Thatβs what itβs designed for and itβs one of the ways we were able to pick up the rare clotting side effect associated with AZ. 2/
@toadmeister What Yellow Card is not so good at is detecting a change in the rate of non-serious events that sometimes happen anyway. People experiencing a heavy period post-vaccine is a good example of such an event. 3/