The Adams campaign memo that they put out today to suggest they're gonna win is interesting and worth a read, especially if you think Garcia is strongly favored.

scribd.com/document/51382…
Point #1 seems largely correct, assuming the 'preliminarily valid absentee ballots' number they cite is accurate. It's interesting that the rejection rate is so high, but IIRC that may have happened in past NYC elections as well.

Garcia needs to win absentees by about 15.67%.
I do feel like point #2 ("VBM ballots come from Assembly Districts that favor Eric") can be somewhat of a statistical illusion - Adams' large 1st round margin gets reduced by RCV. There's also a demographic aspect here that can't be captured by geography.

Point #3 is interesting as well. I agree that Wiley is highly unlikely to make the final round.

Absentees could be better for Yang because of Queens, and since Wiley voters are more likely than Yang voters to favor Garcia, this could reduce Garcia's absentee advantage somewhat.
Here's where I see the race:
- Garcia is likely to remain ahead of Wiley to reach the final round.
- Garcia should gain ground because of absentee votes, but the question is if it's enough (needs margin of ~16%).
- It'll be pretty close either way and either candidate could win.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Ryan Matsumoto

Ryan Matsumoto Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ryanmatsumoto1

30 Jun
I actually don't think that the NYC BOE erroneously adding ~135k test votes materially changes today's big takeaway - that Garcia gains a lot of ground from ranked choice voting and has a solid shot at winning the NYC Mayor election.

THREAD 🧵(1/4)

The candidates that benefitted the most from the ~130k test votes were disproportionately very minor candidates like Taylor, Chang, Wright, "Paperboy Love Prince," Foldenauer, and Write-Ins.

(2/4)
Many of the test ballots that ranked minor candidates first didn't ranked anyone else or ranked other very minor candidates for 2/3/4/5.

Only 21.44% of the votes for Taylor/Chang/Wright/Prince/Foldenauer/Write-Ins were reallocated by round 7.

docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d…

(3/4)
Read 5 tweets
23 Jun
The NYC Mayor results we get tonight will only be first round preferences for early + election day votes (NOT absentee).

The Adams/Wiley campaigns estimated 800k-900k total turnout on the Dem side.

87k Dem absentee ballots have been returned so far out of 208k requested.

(1/4)
32% of returned absentee ballots (Democrats) are from Manhattan while 24% are from Brooklyn. The 32% is likely higher than Manhattan's share of the Democratic primary electorate while 24% is likely lower than Brooklyn's share.

vote.nyc/sites/default/…

(2/4)
Manhattan will probably be Garcia's strongest borough while Brooklyn will be one of Adams' strongest boroughs.

So based on the absentee ballot data I'd say Garcia is probably the candidate most likely to move up with absentees while Adams is most likely to move down.

(3/4)
Read 4 tweets
22 Jun
Here's my rough estimates for the NYC Mayor primary:

Chance of making it to final round vs. Adams:
Garcia 47%
Wiley 37%
Yang 16%

Chance of beating Adams if they make it to the final round:
Garcia 50%
Wiley 34%
Yang 28%

Overall chances:
Adams 59%
Garcia 24%
Wiley 13%
Yang 4%
An average of 6 ranked choice polls that have the Adams vs. Garcia vs. Wiley penultimate round have Garcia edging out Wiley by 1.83 points. Garcia may also get a boost here from the Yang alliance.

Yang has a chance at the final round, but his position has deteriorated recently.
The average of ranked choice polls suggests Adams vs. Garcia would be a toss-up.

DFP had Wiley doing 12 points worse than Garcia versus Adams, while CitizenData had it at 4 pts.

Yang's best polls (Ipsos/Schoen Cooperman) still have him losing to Adams.

Read 4 tweets
27 May
I think Trump would have done about the same had COVID never happened.

Trump's net approval rating was at -9.1% on 3/1/20 and -8.0% on 11/2/20, per the @FiveThirtyEight polling average.

There also wasn't really a shift away from Trump in places that were hit hardest by COVID.

Some of the places where COVID hit hardest (NYC, RGV) actually shifted the most *towards* Trump.

Demographic trends swamped any limited anti-Trump COVID effect that might have existed.
The "COVID cost Trump the election" theory is popular for a few reasons:

- Democrats think Trump did an *awful* job - surely that should have hurt him!
- Republicans want to shift blame for losing to an external factor.

I just don't think it's very well supported by the data.
Read 4 tweets
5 Jan
Forced to choose with no Tossups, I’ll go with:

Tilt D
Ossoff by 2
Warnock by 2
3 key data points to this election:

#1: Perdue edged out Ossoff by 1.78 points in the first round.
#2: Early vote data shows strong initial Democratic turnout, especially with Black voters.
#3: Polls give Democrats a *very slight* edge.

#1 favors GOP and #2/3 favor Democrats.
The ratings are based on my confidence in each side winning rather than the expected margins.

There's a lot of uncertainty in this election, and there are very strong arguments in favor of Republicans pulling this off.

Read 5 tweets
3 Jan
I would say that the strongest argument in favor of Republicans is that Perdue won the first round by 1.78 points.

The pro-D counterargument is that early voting turnout data is strong for Democrats.

(1/6)

A lot of this comes down to how revealing you think the early vote data is.

On one hand, many people have been burned by EV analysis in the past. The GOP can just show up on Election Day.

But there are a few factors that make EV potentially more interesting this time...

(2/6)
First, we have a decent baseline comparison of the November election. It's recent enough that there probably aren't a ton of people changing their minds.

This makes Early Vote analysis better than comparing 2012 to 2016, for example, when many people switched sides.

(3/6)
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(