Tweet

Aurora Intel

1 Jul, 12 tweets, 6 min read

The #IDF are reportedly responding to the 4 fires caused earlier today by incendiary balloons. Airstrikes are being reported south of #Gaza City at a compound belonging to #Hamas.

#Hamas Quraish site was targeted by 3 missiles according to reports. This site was targeted multiple times in the last couple of weeks in response to the incendiary balloons.

#Hamas Nisarem site targeted with 2 missiles per local reports. Site located in central Gaza Strip.

#Gaza #Israel
[Knish]

Photo of strikes ongoing now:

#Israel #Gaza
[Knish]

Badr site targeted by IAF. Site located next to Baidar hall, west of Gaza City.

#Israel #Gaza
[Knish]

Footage of one of the airstrikes against a #Hamas compound.

The earlier photo was from a strike against Hamas’ Natzerim Site.

According to local reports: a fire erupted in the Badr site following strikes by the IAF.

#Israel #Gaza
[Knish]

#Hamas’s Quraish, Natzerim and Badr Camps/Compounds are repeated locations for #IDF airstrikes in response to incendiary balloons.

Local reports of no injuries from the airstrikes.

#IDF statement released, airstrikes over. IDF reportedly targeted a #Hamas R&D site.

IDF drones continue to fly over the Gaza strip in multiple areas.

#Israel #Gaza
[Knish]

@FoundOnSoar

Imagery via @FoundOnSoar geolocated from May 2021 shows that these buildings are new and recent since the conflict.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

More from @AuroraIntel

Aurora Intel

@AuroraIntel

3 Jul

Israeli air strike reported on a Hamas site south of #Gaza City.

Airstrikes are in response to the fires caused by incendiary balloons over the last two days.

Additional strike reported west of Gaza City. First site targeted with two missiles (south) and second with one.

Read 9 tweets

Aurora Intel

@AuroraIntel

3 Jul

@AlMayadeenNews

Unconfirmed reports are circulating of a fire aboard an #Israel|I Vessel in the Indian Ocean, the reports circulating are all sourcing from a single source it seems, @AlMayadeenNews. Al-Mayadeen talks of origin port being #Jeddah, #KSA and then arriving in #UAE.

https://twitter.com/AlMayadeenLive/status/1411352170751012866

Oddly, that’s that’s not the Indian Ocean, but none the less, here is the tweet from Al-Mayadeen.

https://twitter.com/AlMayadeenLive/status/1411352170751012866

Taking into account these reports Jeddah > UAE, Israeli Cargo Vessel, this comes to one at the moment in this area, CSAV TYNDALL, owned by Zodiac Maritime, which is managed by Eyal Ofer.

Of course, this could be completely incorrect, as the story is unconfirmed.

Read 14 tweets

Aurora Intel

@AuroraIntel

3 Jul

Thinking about this PEMEX incident more. 12 inch duct pipeline bursts/ruptures (was it complete instant failure or has it been gradual over a period of time?), the pressure created the column from the 100m/300ft depth. The column of gas would continue to be linear because they…

Closed the valves, ESD the platform and then would have blown down the pipeline to remove the gas in the system, to completely depressurise it *could* take several hours (fire reportedly burnt for around 5 which could align), eventually the blow down would have been neutralised

By the sea pressure at 100m/300ft depth, the fire itself would have extinguished at that point as gas would have stopped and the surface fire would die out. The vessels pumping water weren’t trying to put out the fire they were disrupting the water to keep the gas in a central

Read 4 tweets

Aurora Intel

@AuroraIntel

2 Jul

Wikipedia gold as always

100m/300ft depth, from a broken 12 inch duct pipeline, that gas should have dispersed and not be concentrated to create a central fire like that, unless the piping is creating a linear pillar of gas up to the surface, which is a rather interesting one

Ok, so per PEMEX statement looks like they did close the valves further up the line and ESD to stop the flow of gas, which makes sense, curious how it ignited though, and why wasn’t the leak detected before it ignited, surely the pressure monitor should have picked that up?

Read 5 tweets