Oh ho ho I just saw this. With @gaberivera's begrudging permission and significant trepidation I will be tackling the mini-essay questions in a tweet thread. Let's begin!
I'm a fan of @techmeme. The first essay question explains what the requirement is. The article in question is located at neowin.net/news/webrtc-be….
Answer 1: "Technology I don't understand certified as standard by groups you don't understand to do things nobody understands."
Answer 2: "This story is an unattributed sponsorship of Techmeme by Google. Please perform unpaid image classification work for them to train their AI/ML services."
Apparently there was some confusion:
Answer 2: "Insufferable jackass fails to understand technology, laws, and how every tech company's terms of service actually work; also conflates 'conservatism' with 'violate hate speech.'"
Answer 3: "Company that makes processors whose value proposition is 'making Intel seem competitive' discovers lack of customers; pivots to industry that believes touchscreens are a smart idea for vehicle controls and is thus presumed to be older, dumber."
Answer 4: "Journalist who writes code instead of trusting PR folks takes internet by storm. If you aren't following @wongmjane then what are you even doing, go do that immediately."
Answer 5: "While many observers see the challenges with the government's case against Facebook as being rooted in antitrust law, the reality is that prosecutors are strangely timid to aggressively pursue a company with access to private messages and a network of toilet cameras."
And lastly! One tweet for each publication to follow.
1. While you could claim @verge's in-depth coverage of tech news lands them the #1 spot, the reality is that a lot of the Techmeme folks are night owls, and the dark theme is way easier on the eyes.
2. "Before it's on Techmeme, it's on @business. And before it's on Bloomberg, it's on the Bloomberg Terminal. And before it's on the Bloomberg Terminal, it's on background."
3. "The @nytimes drives engagement by spurring Twitter influencers to angrily and publicly cancel their subscriptions for the third time in a week."
4. "The @WSJ helps Techmeme cater to a varied audience with its combination of astonishingly good journalism and breathtakingly bad opinions."
5. "Having multiple providers for redundancy is a good idea; similarly Techmeme depends upon @TechCrunch to provide VC opinions in case VCs are suddenly unable to shitpost on Twitter because Miami lost internet access."
But seriously--Techmeme is an amazing aggregator that I depend upon. I'd encourage interested folks to apply. techmeme.com/jobs
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I'm seeing a lot of crappy takes about Amazon's leadership principles (amazon.jobs/en/principles) today, and I want to break character for a minute to give my sincere thoughts on them.
Culture is hard. Maintaining that culture across a massively scaled company is virtually impossible. How do you avoid the problem of not having a corporate culture but rather 2000 different ones?
Amazon's answer to this comes in the form of the 16 Leadership Principles. They're easy to snark on, but in the almost five years I've been studying @awscloud I've gone from skeptic to believer.
Many of the big tech companies are forcing staff to go back to the office. I think this is shortsighted; you should make the company beg you to go back to working remote. A thread of advice from some of the worst colleagues I ever had:
Cherry MX blue switches in keyboards are noisy, but buckling springs are louder. You'll get used to them more quickly if you hum along to the sound of your keystrokes.
What's for lunch today? Your leftover fish from last night's dinner. Throw it in the microwave and reheat it. Ten minutes oughta do it.
Just as "be yourself!" is terrible social advice to people whose genuine selves kinda suck, "treat company money like it's your own" is a recipe for corporate disaster. A thread.
Everyone's relationship with money is different. At various points in my life, my personal travel has been "first class is the only thing I book" as well as "hahaha who can afford to fly, we're driving to California. From Maine."
When a manager says "spend company money like it's your own," what they're really saying is "spend company money like I spend my own." And it's impossible to judge as a third party just what that looks like.
I’m seeing several instances lately of @awscloud just handing customer information over to third parties without consent or notification.
Folks are asking for examples. First up, both my CFO and business partner received this last week.
Next, a program I'm involved in with AWS passed out a "benefit" to all participants from a third party. We were opted in to *all* of their marketing communications. I'm partial to the Italian option myself.