Justice DY Chandrachud led bench of #SupremeCourt to hear plea by Kerala Govt seeking permission to withdraw cases against prominent CPI(M) leaders for vandalism in the Kerala Assembly in 2015 when the current ruling party in the State was in opposition @vijayanpinarayi
Plea is against a March 12, 2021 order of the Kerala High Court which had dismissed the State's petition against an order of rejection by the Chief Judicial Magistrate's Court seeking permission to withdraw prosecution against accused including sitting ministers.
Sr Anv Ranjit Kumar: High court has cited minority judgments
Justice Chandrachud: The MLAs wanted to stop the proceedings when finance bill was being passed. That cannot be allowed
Kumar: wrong view from minority judgment has cited
Justice MR Shah: let him give all the judgments he is relying upon, then we will see
Justice Chandrachud: we have not seen the additional documents. So we will keep it next Wednesday
Justice Chandrachud: prima facie we have to take a strict view of this kind of behavior. This is not acceptable behavior. Look at the behaviour of MLA who throws mic on the floor of the house. He must face trial.
Justice Shah: they are MLA they were representing the people
Justice Chandrachud: that is why face trial under the prevention of damage to public property act .This kind of behaviour cannot be condoned.
Justice Shah: we are at the stage of withdrawal at the instance of public prosecutor
Justice Chandrachud: what is the use of guarding an MLA who prevented the passage of a finance bill. Irrespective of the character of the finance minister, the passage of the bill is of utmost importance
Sr Adv Kumar: but the MLA has a right to protest !
Justice Chandrachud: we will hear this on July 15
Sr Adv Mahesh Jethmalani: whether you take majority or minority judgment in Paswan face withdrawal can only be if it furthers public interest and that has not happened here.
Jethamalani: I have so much to say in this case
Sr Adv Jaideep Gupta: Mr jethmalani cannot have the cake and eat it too. He has to a accept notice
Justice Chandrachud: These are sentinels of democracy and we have to maintain a sense of decorum
Justice Shah: now these incidents are happening. It is happening in the parliament too.
We are here to bid farewell to one of the most humanitarian judges who did not let go of any opportunity to extend help, one of the most humane judges, Advocate Abhijat says.
Karnataka High Court to hear plea by Twitter's Manish Maheshwari challenging notice issued to him by Uttar Pradesh Police under Section 41A CrPC over tweets on Ghaziabad assault video
#SupremeCourt hears plea seeking to consider goods and services at par.
Adv: raises a point which will benefit lakhs and lakhs of consumers
Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul: High Court can examine it in detail
Adv: HC does not have the power to issue directions under Article 142
Justice Hemant Gupta: how can the service provided by a doctor be equated with that of a good?
Advocate Hemant Gupta: The court has held it in a number of judgments. Legislature in 1986 services were given greater scope and goods were given lesser
Adv Gupta: The horizon of services was expanded by an amendment. There was a further amendment brought them at par
Justice Kaul: what are you challenging?
Adv Gupta: from 2003 goods and services are at par. but because of typographical error it is not at par
Delhi High Court to hear plea seeking directions to Twitter to appoint a Resident Grievance Officer as mandated under Rule 4 of the Information Technology (Intermediary Guidelines and Digital Media Ethics Code) Rules, 2021
Court points out that only interim Grievance Officer was appointed by Twitter. It is not fair, Mr Poovayya. When a Senior Counsel makes a statement, I take it seriously: Justice Rekha Palli
Allahabad High Court (Lucknow Bench) shortly to hear a plea for quashing of FIR by UP police against Gareeb Nawaz Masjid Committee Secretary in relation to report by the @thewire_in on Masjid demolition.
Advocate Tripathi: This a case, where my clients gave an interview to a news portal, @thewire_in and FIR was registered against them. It is submitted that all the charges under 153A and other connected charges are unsustainable.