Allahabad High Court (Lucknow Bench) shortly to hear a plea for quashing of FIR by UP police against Gareeb Nawaz Masjid Committee Secretary in relation to report by the @thewire_in on Masjid demolition.
Advocate Tripathi: This a case, where my clients gave an interview to a news portal, @thewire_in and FIR was registered against them. It is submitted that all the charges under 153A and other connected charges are unsustainable.
Advocate: We gave an interview, and it was a new website which had published the interview, we just gave the facts and we had no intention to disturb the communal harmony.
Advocate Tripathi: Notice was issued to us and they said no demolition would be taking place and only evidence will be taken, but on May 17, the mosque was demolished.
AGA: On @Twitter they had written that the mosque was demolished and all the bricks were thrown into the river
Court: If the proceedings are going on, then why are going on Twitter? Why everyone wants to be leader? The matter is sub-judice in court of law.
Advocate: I admit that I gave the interview, but I only tabled my case and the facts. Even the High Court has taken note and notice has been issued. We have around 7-8 FIRs filed against us. In one, FIR has been stayed
We are here to bid farewell to one of the most humanitarian judges who did not let go of any opportunity to extend help, one of the most humane judges, Advocate Abhijat says.
Karnataka High Court to hear plea by Twitter's Manish Maheshwari challenging notice issued to him by Uttar Pradesh Police under Section 41A CrPC over tweets on Ghaziabad assault video
#SupremeCourt hears plea seeking to consider goods and services at par.
Adv: raises a point which will benefit lakhs and lakhs of consumers
Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul: High Court can examine it in detail
Adv: HC does not have the power to issue directions under Article 142
Justice Hemant Gupta: how can the service provided by a doctor be equated with that of a good?
Advocate Hemant Gupta: The court has held it in a number of judgments. Legislature in 1986 services were given greater scope and goods were given lesser
Adv Gupta: The horizon of services was expanded by an amendment. There was a further amendment brought them at par
Justice Kaul: what are you challenging?
Adv Gupta: from 2003 goods and services are at par. but because of typographical error it is not at par
Delhi High Court to hear plea seeking directions to Twitter to appoint a Resident Grievance Officer as mandated under Rule 4 of the Information Technology (Intermediary Guidelines and Digital Media Ethics Code) Rules, 2021
Court points out that only interim Grievance Officer was appointed by Twitter. It is not fair, Mr Poovayya. When a Senior Counsel makes a statement, I take it seriously: Justice Rekha Palli
#SupremeCourt bench led by CJI NV Ramana to hear a plea by a doctor turned spiritual practitioner seeking the release of a 21-year-old woman, who he claimed was his “spiritual live-in partner,” from the “illegal custody” of her parents and family.
CJI SA Bobde led bench had earlier allowed the petitioner to approach the High Court so as to get a conclusive finding on whether or not there is illegal detention. #supremecourt#habeascorpus