#BombayHighCourt to hear #StanSwamy’s plea for temporary bail on medical grounds in the appeal challenging the orders passed by the Special NIA Court rejecting him bail.
Hearing before Justices SS Shinde and NJ Jamadar at 2 pm today.
Desai: I only have two things to say. We have no grievance against Holy Family Hospital. The High Court bench ensured that best medical care is given to him. Unfortunately I cannot say the same thing about the NIA and jail authorities.
Court: With all humility at our command, this is a shocking news. We passed that order, to take him to the hospital of his choice.
We have no words to express our condolences.
But since the doctor informed us here, so remaining matter on any other date we will hear.
Desai: If the court needs that enquiry is necessary then post mortem needs to be conducted.
I am not sure that on its own the hospital will consider this.
Desai: I do not want to insist on post mortem if the doctor does not feel so.
However I will request that his body be handed over to Fr. Frazer who is his friend.
I am sure there will be no objection to this.
D Souza: He has been with us. On July 4 early morning, he had a cardiac arrest. Then he was put on ventilator. Subsequent to that he never regained consciousness. Subsequent to that at 1.24 pm today, he was declared dead.
Not on board. Taken on production board.
Mr. Desai, for petitioner, and Mr. ASG Singh for NIA. Dr. D Souza, Medical Director, Holy Family Hospital, Bandra.
We record with a heavy heart that Dr D Souza informed the court that Fr Stan Swamy passed away.
ORder:
Dr D Souza informs that the petitioner had suffered cardiac arrest.
Mr. Desai submitted that the petitioner was awarded best of the treatment at Holy Family hospital.
However Fr Swamy passed away. In the circumstances, Desai submitted that his body may be directed to be handed over to Fr Frazer, the retd principal of St Xaviers college. Who was allowed to meet the appellant in the said hospital by this court.
Desai submitted that the appellant was a priest and had no family. ASG and Public Prosecutor Deepak Thakare stated that they have no objection to give the body to Fr Frazer.
Thakare points out that the procedure by the jail authorities is requirement of post mortem.
Desai: Whatever the order have to be passed, let your lordships pass an order. Going to the court and then what if time is over.
Court: We are passing an order of inquest panchnama and post mortem. We are saying forthwith.
Order: As per his instructions from prison authorities, PP informs that inquest panchnama and post mortem examination is necessary before the body is handed over.
In view of the aforesaid submission and the fact that the appellant has been admitted in the hospital by an order of this court, we direct the state authority to conduct the inquest and post mortem examination and the other requisite formalities forthwith.
Desai: They can conduct post mortem, no objection. Because any death in custody has to be conducted, it has to be as per NHRC guidelines. All medical reports and PM report has to be deposited with this court.
Court (to Desai) Now since you are saying, that death is in custody. Sec 176 CrPC has to be considered. Technically you are right.
Routine enquiry needs to be conducted through the magistrate.
Order: PP assured the Court that requisite steps would be taken during the course of the day.
Desai urges that in view of the unfortunate development, the appellant was admitted in the hospital as a direction of this court.
Order: The procedure for handing over of the body of the deceased may not be relegated to the concerned court and prayed for appropriate direction of this court.
The authorities can be directed to handover the body of the appellant to Fr Frazer.
Order: After the steps of all governing rules and prison manual are completed. Therefore the State shall take all the necessary steps for conducting inquest and post mortem examination of the body of the deceased appellant during the course of the day.
Desai submits that the appeal may be posted for consideration as he intends to make certain submissions. We herby make it clear that all the necessary enquiries including under Section 176 CrPC which are required to be made, on account of death in custody shall be made.
Order:
It shall be made by the authority and court. This order may not be construed as an expression on the relevant issue on hand.
Order: We are informed by Dr D Souza that Swamy was cured of COVID and his tests had come negative.
Desai assures us that the funeral will be conducted in Mumbai, and in conformity with the COVID SOP.
Court concedes and directs that medical reports be produced the next date.
Court: We are sorry to know that despite your best efforts, FR Swamy is not with us.
(To Desai) At the cost of repetition, our deepest condolences and may his soul rest in peace. We all share this.
Court: WE appreciate your efforts, you prevailed over him. He could go to the hospital, he got the best medical treatment. Unfortunately, he could not survive.
We are here to bid farewell to one of the most humanitarian judges who did not let go of any opportunity to extend help, one of the most humane judges, Advocate Abhijat says.
Karnataka High Court to hear plea by Twitter's Manish Maheshwari challenging notice issued to him by Uttar Pradesh Police under Section 41A CrPC over tweets on Ghaziabad assault video
#SupremeCourt hears plea seeking to consider goods and services at par.
Adv: raises a point which will benefit lakhs and lakhs of consumers
Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul: High Court can examine it in detail
Adv: HC does not have the power to issue directions under Article 142
Justice Hemant Gupta: how can the service provided by a doctor be equated with that of a good?
Advocate Hemant Gupta: The court has held it in a number of judgments. Legislature in 1986 services were given greater scope and goods were given lesser
Adv Gupta: The horizon of services was expanded by an amendment. There was a further amendment brought them at par
Justice Kaul: what are you challenging?
Adv Gupta: from 2003 goods and services are at par. but because of typographical error it is not at par
Delhi High Court to hear plea seeking directions to Twitter to appoint a Resident Grievance Officer as mandated under Rule 4 of the Information Technology (Intermediary Guidelines and Digital Media Ethics Code) Rules, 2021
Court points out that only interim Grievance Officer was appointed by Twitter. It is not fair, Mr Poovayya. When a Senior Counsel makes a statement, I take it seriously: Justice Rekha Palli
Allahabad High Court (Lucknow Bench) shortly to hear a plea for quashing of FIR by UP police against Gareeb Nawaz Masjid Committee Secretary in relation to report by the @thewire_in on Masjid demolition.
Advocate Tripathi: This a case, where my clients gave an interview to a news portal, @thewire_in and FIR was registered against them. It is submitted that all the charges under 153A and other connected charges are unsustainable.