1/ #ListeningThread

Two fantastic intellectuals, @robbwolf and @lipoprotein, chatting about lipids, cardiovascular disease, and #LMHRs

Good podcast for my evening walk — might add some thoughts here…
2/ Wow, in the intro Rob mentions Bill having discussed LMHRs with me (and yes, we’ve had many great chats on the topic). Where he agrees, and where he disagrees. To be sure, I have a bit of an advanced preview on what that will likely be. ;) but I’m excited to hear it in the ep.
3/ 28:30 Bill: I think Dave Feldman has probably helped more than any one person in giving disability and how radically our bodies can change [lipid levels] in just days… So yeah, you can actually influence these results quite a bit in a 3 to 5 day period of time…
4/ … depending on how radically you’ve changed things over that period of time. So the expectation is – you should be in your usual state for at least a week or more.”

Music. To. My. Ears.

Yes — be mindful of what you’re consuming running up to your blood test…
5/ I’m incredibly happy to hear Robb and Bill discuss this – as I couldn’t be more opinionated on this topic.

In particular, it’s worth noting that if you drop your overall food consumption (particularly when keto) you may get a higher relative LDL result…
6/ … hence, it’s more likely the best decision to eat at your baseline levels leading up to a blood test so as to avoid perturbing it from where it would likely be in the overall.
7/ The kick off discussion on LMHR at around 1:03.

@robbwolf: "The problem that I've had with this is that when I've done back-of-the-envelope calculations of how much energy is being shuttled around in lipoproteins relative to triglycerides...
8/ ... I don't see how that's a really significant contributor there, and I asked Dave about that, I said, have you ever sat down and done the [calculations] on how many kcals of energy are locked up in all these classic lipoproteins relative to just the triglyceride fraction?...
9/ ..And he says, 'no'. And I said, well, that seems like an important thing to do."

🤔 With loving respect to my good friend, @robbwolf -- citation needed! 😂

I don't recall having this specific discussion... was it on our podcast?

Here's why I wouldn't say 'no' in general...
10/ The ability to calculate shuttled triglycerides onboard lipoproteins isn't achievable without extraordinary tracer studies given we can't track its relative proportions of uptake vs that of NEFA (non-esterified fatty acids) in this context, both in serum and transmigration...
11/ When someone is keto, how can we determine:
- % change in whole body lipolysis?
- Total hepatic NEFA uptake?
- % of hepatic FFA toward ketogenesis vs TG sythesis?
- % of adipocyte VLDL-TG uptake vs non-adipocyte?
- Relative change in lipoprotein lipase activity?
12/ Let me put it this way, if I could hire you to do the calculations and they were even close to the likely reality, I'd pay you a very handsome price! But I don't think we can even ballpark true trafficking and exchange dynamics without at least tracer studies in this context
13/ (And FWIW, I think the tracer studies would still have a lot of challenges, but we'll save that conversation when we can talk live next...)
14 Important section at 1:07:30:

Bill: "So I do think that a Lean Mass Hyper-responder is using energy differently than say an insulin resistant individual. An insulin resistant individual is getting a lot of this energy packed into adipocytes...
15/ "... in LMHR a lot of this energy is being used by muscle with less being packed into adipocytes / fat tissue. So that's one difference."
16/ "Another difference is the fact that a LMHR is insulin sensitive, and therefore they don't have a lot of egress of free fatty acids from their fat cells, just as background. Whereas an insulin resistant person has trouble holding onto the fat in their fat cells..."
17/ "They leach out free fatty acids on a regular basis, it goes into the portal circulation and hits the liver. The liver says, 'oh I can use this to make triglycerides' makes triglyceride, 'now I have to do something with the fat I've made' make more VLDL..."
18/ "Large VLDL particles are fat-enriched are sent out of the liver, that gets degraded into LDL. So part of the problem is that I have all this background substrate hitting the liver making more VLDL in the insulin resistant person."
19/ "That's a fundamental difference between a lean, and an insulin resistant individual. So just physiologically, they are different, and they are processing lipoproteins differently."

I want to stop here for a moment to discuss where my and Bill's hypotheses diverge...
20/ But before I do, I just have to say how honored I am to have moved the conversation this far with such a towering giant in the field. I have such tremendous respect for Dr. Cromwell and appreciate how much thought he's contributed to discussing this topic...
21/ Okay, everything he discusses with regard to an IR individual is spot on.

But while they are not yet comprehensively studied, I want to share my hypotheses as they relate to the #LipidEnergyModel that diverge from his description above...
22/ First, I posit #LMHRs are actually making very active use of their subq adipose. While certainly there is greater direct use by non-adipocytes (particularly myocytes) of ApoB-TG, I still think activity is still very substantial for staging and pacing of FFA availability...
23/ Fortunately, this is very testable as in time we (or some other team ) will do biopsies on LMHR adipocytes to look at relevant areas on this, such as LPL, Angptl3/Angptl4, GPIHBP1, etc.

If activity is low, this would knock down that hypothesis -- we'll see in time...
24/ Second, and perhaps more relevant, I think LMHRs have quite a bit of fatty acids being taken up at the liver as well, but are synthesizing and secreting ApoB-TG quickly, & successfully. This too is very testable. (If net TG secretion by LMHR liver is low-> knocks hypothesis)
25/ Now I need to get super extra geeky here for a second.

High HDL-C is also specific to the LMHR triad. But why would this marker increase so substantially?

I posit it is a strong proxy of post-LPL ApoB-TG turnover, with much of the PL, CE, and FC moving to HDL species
26/ Toward the end of the episode, they discuss the #HADLmodel

cc @zinocker
27/ Overall - this was a fantastic episode for lipophiles

Thanks again, @robbwolf and @Lipoprotein for putting this together.

There was way more covered than I discussed above, so for anyone reading this far who hasn't already queued it up, consider giving it a listen. 👍👍👍
Typo – obviously, he said “visibility on” not “disability and”

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Dave Feldman

Dave Feldman Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @DaveKeto

6 Jul
1/ Great thread by @nicknorwitz

Yes, we started talking about this paper as I stumbled in it while looking up citations for a project we’re doing (more on that later)

Per my recent talks/threads, I think successful LPL activity (emphasis on “successful”) is key with triad/LMHRs
2/ But I had no idea there could actually be such a direct pathway to Acetate/Acetoacetate (AcAc) and LPL expression- being crucial for accessing fat stores. While this paper is a mouse model, it’s results are quite impressive when looking to knockout of GRP43 (GRP4-/-) vs normal
3/ and while Nick’s thread importantly mentions the fact these knockout mice *gained* weight on the ketogenic diet — I think a likewise incredible finding is that they also demonstrated far more difficulty in losing weight when eating nothing at all (fasting)
Read 5 tweets
2 Jul
1/ I'd like to put a lot of misconceptions to bed on this topic -- so let's unpack...

I personally believe the coming #LMHRstudy will be neither one of these:

1) A categorical end to the lipid hypothesis
2) Completely meaningless
2/ If it seems like there's a wide spectrum of possibilities between those two endpoints, it's because there is

Sure, I do think this may end up testing if the lipid hypothesis can be taken as "dose-dependent, log-linear" in every context. But that's not testing it categorically
3/ For example, it could well be we observe a very low progression of plaque in LMHRs for reasons none of us are aware of yet, but of which don't apply to those with atherogenic dyslipidema in original sense (thus, mixed outcome, new mechanistic aspects yet to be determined, etc)
Read 11 tweets
29 Jun
1/ Watching this episode of @PeterAttiaMD's podcast with @garytaubes...

On "Pathological Science"...

Taubes: “One of the defining characteristics of pathological science is — people commit themselves publicly to a result based on premature evidence…”
2/ “…So it’s not ironclad, they haven’t locked it down, there’s still a chance they could be wrong and they don’t understand the likelihood of that chance, no one ever does until you get very good at this when you realize that chance is enormous.”
3/ “And so once you go public, science is supposed to be hypothesis and test, right? You’re supposed to rigorously test your hypotheses and ideally you’re trying to prove that you’re wrong..."
Read 10 tweets
24 Jun
1/ Ethan would like me to comment on whether I'd take a statin if I had a heart attack, which is commonly considered "secondary prevention"

I can't do that as I avoid discussing use of medication, except (ironically) in a few non-cholesterol Rx.

That said, a few things...
2/ First, I definitely DO NOT want anyone to interpret anything I've said as reflective of analysis with secondary prevention. I'm quite upfront that I prefer looking to lipid research with regard to so called, "primary prevention" (populations without prior heart attacks)...
3/ Second -- and as always -- I want everyone to work with your doctor. Yes, I do think your doctor needs to likewise work with you and your health goals, but this is a given.

If I had a heart attack, I'd definitely be working with my doctor and considering all the options...
Read 5 tweets
24 Jun
1/ Thank you for the invitation, @chadinabhan.

I've now listened to the episode and was a bit surprised at a few points, but also less so with others.

Cholesterol is a very emotionally charged topic, and understandably so...
2/ For me, this journey started 6 years ago with alarmingly high total and LDL cholesterol following my going on a ketogenic diet. I became obsessed with trying to understand why and begin reading everything I could on lipidology...
3/ I found through a series of experiments there was quite a bit of change I could induce based on dietary patterns. As I developed and executed this "citizen science" research, I turned it around back to the community to hopefully help us in advancing this important topic.
Read 25 tweets
21 Jun
1/ #Thread - Hypothesis on why leanness + low carb likely to lead to high cholesterol

I originally retweeted this with a simple "yep" given how it this relates to the #LipidEnergyModel.

Many have asked me to expand, so this thread will be my simple, layperson-friendly breakdown
2/ Let's have some fun and use a relatable analogy...

Imagine you had exactly two kinds of stores in the neighborhood: bakeries and butcher shops.

You normally get groceries from both, but recently the bakeries were closed down, so now you just get meat only for meals...
3/ Now that the bakeries are down, there's more demand on the butcher shops, so they are having more inventory sent to them.

But then, the neighborhood increased while the number of butcher shops actually decreased, and this required an even higher rate of shipments to restock.
Read 11 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(