#SupremeCourt bench led by CJI NV Ramana to hear a plea by a doctor turned spiritual practitioner seeking the release of a 21-year-old woman, who he claimed was his “spiritual live-in partner,” from the “illegal custody” of her parents and family.
CJI SA Bobde led bench had earlier allowed the petitioner to approach the High Court so as to get a conclusive finding on whether or not there is illegal detention. #supremecourt#habeascorpus
Sr Adv Gopal Sankaranarayanan: the girl who is an adult should be allowed to decide for herself. The petitioner does not want her with him
CJI: The girl is fragile state of mind. She is 21 and does not know what she is doing. The man is married with two children
Sr Adv Gopal Sankaranarayanan: an adult girl is being illegally detained by her parents. it has been held that a person who has interest in her release can file habeas corpus
CJI: There is nothing illegal detention, she is with her parents
Sr Adv Gopal Sankaranarayanan: aspect of mental health is important here. this case will set a precedent
CJI: My brothers also have the same opinion.We will not set a precedent and the case has to be seen in light of facts of the case
Justice Hrishikesh Roy: points of law is not a problem, you have proven your mettle in the Sabarimala case. The thing is the facts are such and the antecedent of the petitioner is such that it does not inspire confidence. Please try in some other case.
CJI: 1 week back we saw a case in the USA where laws, culture is different. In USA unless an adult gives a consent they cant be given treatment. Now the entire family is on the roads because of that since a mentally unstable person cannot give consent.
CJI: No parent will say that a 21 year old has a mental health issue. In India people cover up mental health issues. If you are really concerned about the girl. we can ask hc to direct the district judge to once in a while call for a report and check on the girl
Sankaranarayana: You can interact with her after a week and decide for yourself
Justice AS Bopanna: this is a case where it is clear that she should not go to the petitioner but let her loose. Rather than that its better she is with her parents.
Justice Bopanna: There was a PIL where parents were concerned about such spiritual gurus. This is a situation when only somebody in that position feels otherwise
Sankarnarayanan: Let the girl interact with you all, there are allegations of injuries being inflicted upon her by the parents
CJI: taking into account peculiar facts and circumstances we are not inclined to interfere in this matter. To satisfy ourselves we request the registrar of the high court to have district judge examine the case and interact with girl and parents and send a report to this court
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
We are here to bid farewell to one of the most humanitarian judges who did not let go of any opportunity to extend help, one of the most humane judges, Advocate Abhijat says.
Karnataka High Court to hear plea by Twitter's Manish Maheshwari challenging notice issued to him by Uttar Pradesh Police under Section 41A CrPC over tweets on Ghaziabad assault video
#SupremeCourt hears plea seeking to consider goods and services at par.
Adv: raises a point which will benefit lakhs and lakhs of consumers
Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul: High Court can examine it in detail
Adv: HC does not have the power to issue directions under Article 142
Justice Hemant Gupta: how can the service provided by a doctor be equated with that of a good?
Advocate Hemant Gupta: The court has held it in a number of judgments. Legislature in 1986 services were given greater scope and goods were given lesser
Adv Gupta: The horizon of services was expanded by an amendment. There was a further amendment brought them at par
Justice Kaul: what are you challenging?
Adv Gupta: from 2003 goods and services are at par. but because of typographical error it is not at par
Delhi High Court to hear plea seeking directions to Twitter to appoint a Resident Grievance Officer as mandated under Rule 4 of the Information Technology (Intermediary Guidelines and Digital Media Ethics Code) Rules, 2021
Court points out that only interim Grievance Officer was appointed by Twitter. It is not fair, Mr Poovayya. When a Senior Counsel makes a statement, I take it seriously: Justice Rekha Palli
Allahabad High Court (Lucknow Bench) shortly to hear a plea for quashing of FIR by UP police against Gareeb Nawaz Masjid Committee Secretary in relation to report by the @thewire_in on Masjid demolition.
Advocate Tripathi: This a case, where my clients gave an interview to a news portal, @thewire_in and FIR was registered against them. It is submitted that all the charges under 153A and other connected charges are unsustainable.