Not going to be popular with this tweet, but the truth needs to be stated.
Central banks are creating massive inequality problems with 1% of asset holders (including myself) benefiting at the expense of the whole society.
I'm not a fan of taxes at all, let alone high taxes...
...as history shows they stifle future potential economic growth.
However, history also shows massive inequality (eventually) results in breaking social fabric via revolutions & civil wars.
The few are benefiting over many with huge CEO compensations, low company tax rates...
...landlords & rent-seekers are not paying any taxes via special schemes (1031 & depreciation),
while many struggle to earn a minimum wage & cannot afford basic healthcare needs.
The system will never be in balance, but currently, it's completely one-sided with MASSIVE risks.
In the book titled “The Great Leveler” Stanford university professor observes major historical events where economic and social inequality was at extreme,
and concludes solutions was eventually achieved in four different ways: warfare, revolution, state collapse, or plague.
I'm not sure there is a solution apart from history taking its own course of mean reversion (as it has before, evident in the book above).
However, I did come across this image — which I wholeheartedly agree.
Why: carefully selected & diversified portfolio of litigation cases can return 30%+ annually while being totally uncorrelated to traditional assets during a potential crash, plus Pound might rise vs $USD giving additional returns
Litigation funding is outperforming all other asset classes including private equity, real estate, private debt, hedge funds, and the stock index funds.
Yet it still remains very unsexy due to a high barrier of entry (expertise & know-how, large minimum ticket sizes, etc).
Additionally, the UK litigation cases are denominated in British Pounds — has recently broken out of its 13-year downtrend against the greenback.
We are hopeful the Pound might continue appreciating, gifting investors a double return (underlying ROI + exchange rate carry).
Swensen's portfolio allocation weighting over the years.
"Mr. Swensen often blasted the excessive costs of the mutual-fund industry and the conflicts of interest on Wall Street. He bashed activist investors as value-destroying and asset-gathering managers as out for themselves."
we were told many US states (California, Nevada, Florida, etc) and various countries around the world (Spain, Ireland, etc) were suffering from property shortages.
2/ Once artificial demand pulled back as the downturn started, it turned out we never had any shortages at all.
Many were just buying their 3rd, 5th or 13th investment property by using excessive leverage.
I assume we will get a similar, or worse outcome in the next 5 years.
3/ Excessive leverage fuels booms like nothing else,
and it typically create enormous oversupply (mortal enemy of long term prices).
I can only imagine how much malinvestment we will have to deal with once the tide pulls back and we notice many are swimming without shorts.
#Sentiment very much feels like 2011, 2015, and 2018.
The time to start paying attention to risk management is when the day stock indices continue making new record highs,
while fewer & fewer index components do NOT confirm those new highs.
Last we saw this, in February 2020, we sold a lot of our holdings.
$SPY $ACWI
The lowest quality corporate credit is signaling risky times ahead, as spreads tighten towards 2007 levels.
While no indicator is perfect, historically very tight spreads between CCC junk bonds & Treasuries have indicated euphoric sentiment and overbought public securities.