The High Court had, on June 18, ordered the NHRC to constitute a committee to examine complaints. NHRC had constituted a 7-member committee which had visited various parts of the State before submitting an interim report to the Court.
On the last date of hearing, the Court had issued a show cause notice for contempt of court against the Deputy Commissioner of Police of South Kolkata for failing to prevent obstruction to the NHRC team that visited Jadavpur.
Senior Advocate Kapil Sibal appears on behalf of West Bengal government and police. Mentions application seeking NHRC interim report that was sent to Court in sealed cover.
Give that report to us so that we can file an affidavit. On the basis of sealed cover report, Court had held that allegations were established. I dont want recall of the order today, but we should be given an opportunity to reply: Sibal
Autopsy of Avijit Sarkar body being prepared. Brother of Sarkar said that he cannot recognize body because of mutilation. He has agreed to DNA test of the body.
Senior Advocate Mahesh Jethmalani for petitioner and brother of Sarkar: He must know whether the body is of his brother or not. He wants a DNA test on the body.
Advocate General Kishore Datta: The brother and complainant are not cooperating. They are not giving statements despite being asked 8 times. Section 91 and 161 CrPC notices have also been sent. Section 164 statements have not been taken
On July 2, Court had directed second autopsy of Avijit Sarkar. Today ASG Dastur says that autopsy has been conducted and report will be submitted to Court in sealed cover.
Biswajit Sarkar may carry his Aadhaar card at the time of taking his sample. Samples will be sent to CFSL, Kolkata. The Director of CFSL is directed to conduct DNA analysis at the earliest and submit a report to Court in one week: Court
AG Datta: SC may or may not transfer the investigation. As of now, State Police is probing the matter. Let someone from police be present while samples are taken.
Supply copy of affidavit filed by Deputy Commissioner of Police of South Kolkata, against whom show cause notice for contempt of court proceedings was issued, to be sent to petitioners: Court
Chief Justice of India NV Ramana led bench of Supreme Court to hear a plea by Major General S.G. Vombatkere challenging the constitutionality of Section 124A IPC which penalises for the offence of #Sedition
Justice GS Patel of #BombayHighCourt: I am not stopping any fair reporting of these proceedings, nor will I ever stop. Neither are the petitioners seeking that. I have a problem with the editorial comment on the cross examination and the commentary.
Justice Patel had called upon the Plaintiff and online publication Udaipur Times to explain how access to trial records pertinent to the case was made available to the media.
The defendant in the case had filed an interim applicant raising grievance that the plaintiff in the case was giving access of the pertinent trial records in an ongoing trial through social media.
#BombayHighCourt to hear the PIL seeking directions to make use of A4 size paper printed on both sides mandatory for filing all pleadings in the High Court and subordinate courts in Maharashtra.
Hearing before Chief Justice Dipankar Datta and Justice GS Kulkarni.
Read details of the petition filed by Mumbai lawyer Ajinkya Udane @ajinkyaudaneadv
Adv SR Nargolkar for the HC administration submits that a notification amending the OS and AS Rules of High Court has been issued and the grievance stands redressed.
A4 size paper permitted to be used for filing and for internal work.
Supreme Court to shortly hear the appeal of Uttar Pradesh govt against Allahabad HC’s order wherein it had passed directions in its suo motu COVID case for improving the medical facilities. A vacation bench had earlier stayed the order. #supremecourt#suomotu#covid19
hearing begins
Matter has been passed over as SG Tushar Mehta is in another court
#SupremeCourt to shortly deliver verdict on a plea by Madras Bar Association challenging Sections 12, 13 of the Tribunal Reforms Ordinance, 2021 and Sections 184 and 186(2) of the Finance Act, 2017 as amended by the Ordinance
One of the moot point of the hearing was whether the retrospective effect given to Section 184(11) of Finance Act would override the judgments of the Supreme Court. #supremecourt#tribunalordinance
Madras Bar Association had argued that challenged provisions are in "contravention of principles of separation of powers, independence of the judiciary (both being part of the basic structure of our Constitution), and are against efficient and effective administration of justice"
#BREAKING: Madras High Court dismisses plea by State General Secretary of the BJP Karu Nagarajan against Tamil Nadu govt’s constitution of a nine-member panel to study the impact of #NEET on socially and economically backward students.
#MadrasHighCourt ORDER: Setting up of the commission does not amount to subverting any process of (medical) admission, far less an act of defiance to any order passed by #SupremeCourt or even remotest challenge to the authority of the Union. #NEET
#MadrasHighCourt ORDER: The setting up of the commission can by no stretch of imagination be seen to be contrary to any Supreme Court order, whether letter or spirit or as a counter to any legislative action taken by the Union or process put in place. #NEET