1. The story that the unvaccinated are "Variant Factories" is a lie that must be answered.

Technically, every infected individual is a variant factory, but such a statement is misleading in the extreme...
2. Point mutations occur at random in viruses, all the time, constantly. Most mutations either result in nonviable progeny, or progeny that is no more (and potentially less) harmful. That's > 99.99999% of such progeny.
3. So, it does not matter that there is greater diversity among surviving mutated strains among the unvaccinated. According to Muller's ratchet, selection continues to less harmful survivors, no matter how diverse.
4. What matters is that the result of vaccination is a screening process for progeny---a sieve! The process of passing through the sieve selects specifically for those mutations that evade defenses. By definition!

(Sorry for my bad art)
5. This means that the vaccinated are "factories that select for immune evasion", while the unvaccinated are "factories of random, mostly nonsensical, but diverse mutations that almost always die out quickly while crowding out those that might evade mutation"!
6. The greatest risk is a variant that evades evasion, carrying with it spike protein in a form not specific enough for existing antibodies to recognize, then potentially to be enhanced in interaction. This tempts the ADE result we hope not to see.
*evades immunity (not evades evasion, heh)
7. I wrote a more complete argument on the topic.


• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh

Keep Current with Rounding the Earth

Rounding the Earth Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!


Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @EduEngineer

11 Jun
1. Yesterday on @BretWeinstein's podcast, Robert Malone, inventor of the mRNA vaccine, told the world that the spike protein is indeed opening up the blood brain barrier. This should lead to a redefinition of both COVID-19 and vaccine adverse events. I will explain...
2. Coronaviruses never previously caused all the kinds of damage we have seen. It seems almost certain now that the spiked protein is itself responsible for much of what we call C19 and also vaccine adverse events.
3. We should then be talking about something like COVID-type-1 and COVID-type-2 illnesses. The SARS-CoV-2 virus causes both, but those that overlap with the vaccines might be defined as the type 2.
Read 16 tweets
9 Jun

1. Of the next 20 research papers examining effects of HCQ treatment of C19 patients, the majority show positive results.

2. Same bet for IVM.

(Since some studies are small, we ignore stat significance.)

I can go $5,000 apiece.

We can agree on an arbiter.
Who wants a piece?

We can define terms more precisely, of course. This is a tweet to get the ball rolling.
Disclaimer: I am involved (funded) in data collection and statistical analysis of the results for both medications.
Read 4 tweets
12 May
These words don't mean what you think they mean...

I'm not "anti-mask".

I'm "most common masks do very little for an aerosolized virus one-two-thousands the size of the pores" and "there really are trade-offs of health and communication" and "harassing people over this seems crazy".
I'm not "anti-vaxx".

I'm "I'd like to know the long term risks both for my person and also existential risks such as leaked evolutionary pressure that might make this thing go 'Spanish flu' for real this time" and "give me a cost-benefit analysis first" and "kids? Really?!"
Read 14 tweets
16 Apr
55. I feel strongly enough about the weirdness of "anti-vaxxer" shaming people who don't want to be part of a mass human trial that I'm including this in the thread of threads.
56. An excellent thread by @the_brumby laying out the evidence of lockdown efficacy (it ain't good).

57. A history of following the herd in medicine.
Read 16 tweets
19 Dec 20
There is a strangely organized rumor going around that the AMA passed a resolution recognizing the efficacy of HCQ and calling on a reversal of its suppression. Unfortunately, that resolution was not passed, but I suggest the story is more interesting than that...
When you think about it, the resolution never had a chance of passing. Intuitively, we all know this. The AMA and Pharma are far too intertwined, and further with the government. Suggesting that the resolution could pass would be to suggest there was no opposition to begin with.
But here is the interesting part: Almost nobody, save for the few of us doing broad levels of research on the topic, knew to step in and correct the mistake. What does that mean?
Read 9 tweets
18 Dec 20
@Kevin_McKernan @BrunnerCreative @ScottAdamsSays @vgttrom @JamesTodaroMD There are 20 natural experiments, and in 19 of them, the nation starting to use HCQ saw mortality rates fall OR the nation stopping usage saw it rise relative to baseline.

I will drop some of my own graphs here...
@Kevin_McKernan @BrunnerCreative @ScottAdamsSays @vgttrom @JamesTodaroMD Portugal stopped using in late May while their CFR was tanking. A couple of weeks later that trend reversed (median days to death is 18.5).
Read 14 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!