1) Arca is one of the largest xSUSHI holders w/ 7.51% of the circulating supply. We bought all tokens in the secondary market, without lockups or discounts. We are customers, we stake, & and we have been very outspoken publicly, supporting the ecosystem.
2) Sushiswap does not need money, as indicated by @0xMaki himself. We agree that there is merit to diversifying the Treasury, but not at current depressed prices, and there is no justification for the size of a $60mm raise.
3) The proposed discount and short lock-up are not indicative of a vibrant growth project like SUSHI. $SUSHI is currently trading at a massive discount to its fair value, and now is absolutely not the time to be selling.
4) We believe our expertise in capital markets and deal structuring can bring more economic and strategic benefit to $SUSHI and its existing investors/community than the current proposal.
5) Some of the VCs touting their “strategic benefits” are selling $SUSHI into a declining low-volume market to buy this new deal at cheaper levels. In other words, this looks more like an arbitrage trade than a strategic, long-term investment.
6) Arca’s New Proposal: If the $SUSHI community is intent on selling from its treasury in this environment, then we will happily be buyers at prices that are advantageous to us, but much more fair to the community.
7) Since we strongly believe that $SUSHI is already trading at a significant discount to fair value, we won’t require further discounts. In fact, we will pay ABOVE current trading levels.
8) The average Price-to-Sales ratio of the entire DEX market is 12.7x. If $SUSHI traded at these levels, SUSHI would trade at $39.85. We see no reason SUSHI should be trading at a discount to its competitors.
9) We propose $SUSHI sell tokens at different price intervals, based on premiums to the lowest closing price in 2Q ($6.40). We believe SUSHI should offer tokens transparently using the new limit order feature on Sushiswap. All community members should be able to participate.
10) Why is this proposal better?
There is clearly strong demand for the $SUSHI token given the vibrant community, project fundamentals, and large number of “strategic” investors who have expressed interest in a $60mm private round.
11) We believe it is more valuable to have a diversified community of many smaller investors / users than it is to have a concentrated group of large passive investors.
This is the whole point of governance tokens -- to give a voice, and equal opportunity, to all members.
12) Conclusion: If our proposal is accepted, Arca will backstop the deal with a minimum purchase of $10mm at the first offering price $7.04. With this higher bid from Arca, $SUSHI would be negligent offering tokens below this price.
13) Our proposal saves $SUSHI $22.6mm dollars and releases 4mm less tokens saving SUSHI holders from additional dilution.
There are many projects just like $AXS, w/ high user/revenue growth & favorable tokenomics. Most information is publicly available, & it has nothing to do with "the tech".
Axie was achieving success long before the token went parabolic.
It's not rocket science why $BNB, $FTT, $AAVE, $SUSHI, $HXRO, $CHZ, $AXS, $UNI, $MKR, $NXM, $CAKE, $PERP, $MATIC & other revenue generating entities have been amongst the best performing tokens.
This industry glamorizes early stage VCs that find the "diamond in the rough" before the company actually achieves success.... meanwhile, there are tons of companies doing great things today staring you right in the face.
It's far easier to buy "what is" versus "what could be".
Bear theses that we refute include (1-5): 1) CCP regime change is intent on killing digital assets
2)Massive regulatory pressure from the US 3) The Fed will be tapering soon and that is bad for risk assets 4) Retail momentum and interest is dead 5) Lack of institutional interest
Bear theses that we refute include (6-10) 6) ESG concerns 7) Tether, Celsius, BlockFi, Binance risk 8) Microstrategy is going to be a forced seller of Bitcoin 9) Grayscale (GBTC) unlocks are going to crush the market 10) Digital asset fundamentals are deteriorating
Transparency update: We have periodically released public thoughts about select investments at @arca.
In the spirit of improving #transparency in this asset class, here is an update on these positions, and Arca's current involvement
$HXRO $CHZ $WNXM $EOS $SUSHI $LEO $GNO
1) $SUSHI
We loved it at $18.; we love it even more at $9. We have been large buyers over the past month, tripling our position with buys between $6 and $13, & we'll keep buying at depressed levels. We believe this is the cheapest asset in the market.
We have not sold any -- and continue to add. At 1.07x book value, WNXM is basically a free call option on Nexus' growth, which we think will be massive. There's a reason 3 Wall Street firms have written on Nexus recently - it works.
Hearing manymisconceptions about the $MSTR secured bond deal, what it means for $BTC, and many completely false narratives about "Will Saylor be forced to liquidate his BTC?"
Here's our interpretation of the bond covenants from the prospectus (h/t @MikeDershewitz )
Thread 👇
1) Collateral
Even though $MSTR says they intend to buy #Bitcoin, there is no promise or requirement to buy $BTC. This bond is a standard secured bond ($500MM) which is secured by all corp assets other than the first 92K BTC ($3.4bn @$37K) already purchased - that was carved out
The $500MM raised MAY be used to buy $BTC (which $MSTR said they will do), but the investing public should hold them to it if they don't. They are under no obligation to buy #Bitcoin.
Every sell-off ends when a catalyst emerges... easy to find catalysts for things like $ETH (EIP-1559), $DOT (parachain launch) but what will be the likely catalyst for $BTC?
Here are 2 possibilities:
1) People constantly confuse "institutional buyers" w/ "fast money traders"
Ruffer, Blackrock, Minerd, etc - traders. They entered (unemotionally) when $BTC was cheap & underlevered ahead of catalysts (4Q20) & exited when expensive, overlevered, & lost its catalysts (2Q21)
But these traders made a lot of money, & will return (with others) when $BTC gets cheap again... when
- leverage is flushed (✅)
- fear gets too high (✅)
- fiscal/monetary stimulus continues unabated
Nowhere else to go with rates heading back to 0% & the USD going down.
I said tokens turn customers into owners & incentivizes USAGE of a protocol & product, not that it incentivizes buyers of a token. Thus, not a get rich quick MLM. It is a way to attract & retain customers. MLMs favor the rich sellers; pass thru tokens favor the everyday customers
If a restaurant gave out free food for a month, it would attract customers, but be a failed biz model unless the food & service was so good that they came back after it was no longer free.
Tokens create step 1; step 2 is up to the project, & many are now succeeding at retention