Message to Bro Hajji:
In your first video about #tabarruk you stated how 'takfiri' 'Vahabi-Najdiyaa' are for regarding tabarruk as shirk. That's a lie about Atharis. So far you haven't provided a single statement by the Imam of the Najdi Da'wah i.e. Shaykh Abdil-Wahhab.
In your first video about #tabarruk you stated how 'takfiri' 'Vahabi-Najdiyaa' are for regarding tabarruk as shirk. That's a lie about Atharis. So far you haven't provided a single statement by the Imam of the Najdi Da'wah i.e. Shaykh Abdil-Wahhab.
Is it because he never made blanket takfir? in fact, he refutes and other Hanbali giants refute your allegations with which you have fooled the gullible.
Where did he make takfir? Why is your entire Vahabis-make -takfir-because-of-tabarruk argument based on a STRAW MAN?
Where did he make takfir? Why is your entire Vahabis-make -takfir-because-of-tabarruk argument based on a STRAW MAN?
I've written an extensive article which proves that you, Bro Hajji, have DISTORTED the position of not just Shaykh ibn Abdil-Wahhab, but the entire Hanbali madhab and Atharis, as none of them believed that based on a solitary report...
...that you'elve shown (whilst omitting the commentary of the same book!) it is fine to kiss the Prophet's (s) grave. This is a Judeo-Christian/Rafidi-Sufi practice which was called as such (tradition of the Jews and Christians by Hanbali giants): ebnhussein.com/2021/07/12/did…
And it doesn't matter if you restrict it i.e. the kissing, to the Prophet's (s) grave. It's still a Yahoodi practice.
So how can you be an Athari if Hanbalis/Atharis reject this practice as their read the reports of Imam Ahmad holistically (which you haven't) on this matter?
So how can you be an Athari if Hanbalis/Atharis reject this practice as their read the reports of Imam Ahmad holistically (which you haven't) on this matter?
You also know that you messed up when you quoted that khurafi Sufi Ibn 'Alawi who cited that fairy-tale that Imam Ahmad slurped Imam Shafi'is sweat water for #tabarruk purposes.
It's an unauthentic Report that is peddled by Sufis. You as an 'Athari' passionately presented it in support (!) of tabarruk.
Why don't you make taraju' if you have no ta'assub? This is distortion and lying about a great Imam based on flimsy narrations (and it doesn't matter of ibn al-Jawziyah or fulan and 'illan put it in their books).
As for the latest desperate attempt of using the statements of mainly khalaf in support of tabarruk with other than the Prophet (s). Nobody says they are *mushrik* Qubooris:
https://twitter.com/EbnHussein1424/status/1416023631617003527?s=19
Having said him, just like ARH I invited him to a live discussion but of course it was declined by him with the usual 'technicalities' excuses. No, we don't celebrate. to Hajji', nor are our tweets filled with emojis; it's just that even your fans won't buy these excuses anymore.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
