The government’s bill on judicial review is published today. The spin says it’s only for lefty lawyers. That’s not true👇
We used it last summer with @mashedkeyboard to defend fair grades for every A level student. They chanted ‘f*ck the algorithm’ then the JR case made the government scrap it: foxglove.org.uk/2020/08/17/we-…
We used JR with @JCWI to beat back a racist algorithm that unfairly judged the ‘risk’ of millions of visa applications, effectively giving “speedy boarding” to white people: foxglove.org.uk/2020/08/04/hom…
We are using JR right now with @allthecitizens to stop the scandal of government by WhatsApp where hugely important decisions are made via messages that then vanish forever: dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9…
These aren’t ‘lefty’ issues. Judicial review protects everyone. We’re proud to have helped doctors, A Level students - and a Conservative MP - hold government to account. We’ll all be a lot less safe if JR is choked like this. Sign up to hear more: foxglove.org.uk/campaigns/join…
🚨VICTORY in our #NHSDataGrab case! Last night the government announced a serious roll back - they’re going to do (some of) what our coalition has been asking for all along. Sometimes it takes a legal threat to get gov to do the right thing. More here 👇 digital.nhs.uk/news-and-event…
Govt has announced they’ve FINALLY agreed to a proper information campaign. They’ve said they’ll make sure we ALL know what is happening to our GP data. We really, really hope it happens but we’re certainly not taking their word for it. We will be watching 👀 - so stay tuned!
"We will use this time to talk to patients, doctors, health charities, doctors, and others to strengthen the plan, build a trusted research environment, and ensure that data is accessed securely." - Jo Churchill
This is an important step.
We still have questions: how will patients be notified, including people who aren't online? How will the trusted research environment work? On what terms will corporations be allowed to access people's health data?
We think it’s probably because NHS Digital actually *agrees* with us that patients need more time to learn about the data grab and to choose whether or not to opt-out, as the BBC reported here: bbc.co.uk/news/technolog…
That means it's only Matt Hancock who refuses to do the right thing: stop the plan, drop the opt-out deadline and launch a proper national debate. Sign our petition to tell him to see sense before we’re forced to take him to court: foxglove.org.uk/nhs-data
There IS no public health without public trust – so we were also v concerned when the gov’t wouldn’t rule out dodgy US tech companies like Palantir being given contracts to manage this giant new pool of confidential patient data:
Time is running out. The deadline to opt out is 23 June. Most people haven’t heard of the scheme. The gov’t hasn’t properly informed or involved patients.
If they don’t fix it, we’ve got to go for an injunction ASAP. We sent an urgent legal letter: ft.com/content/a13225…
Our coalition says the process for scraping 55m people’s confidential health records and putting in a central database has been rushed and unfair – and is unlawful.
Unless the scheme is stopped and changed, we will take the government to court.
We’re asking everyone to join us in doing the same: nopalantir.org.uk
[THREAD]
Palantir, whom you might remember from 🍉 cocktail fame, is using COVID-19 to get their hooks into our NHS. They were brought in without public consultation or open procurement, and we had to threaten a lawsuit to get information about their data deal:
Time and again Palantir’s tech has been used to harm, not heal. Founded by Trump-backing Peter Thiel, they’ve enabled some of the worst actions of the US surveillance state - from border forces to police.