The Court ordered the Delhi government to take steps to frame a policy to carry out the assurance given by the CM and to give reasons if they decide not to implement the CM's proposal.
"Once the CM had made a solemn assurance, there was a duty cast on the GNCTD to take a stand as to whether to enforce the said promise or not, and if so on what grounds or on the basis of what reasons," the judgment said.
A statement given in a consciously held press conference, in the background of the lockdown announced due to the pandemic and the mass exodus of migrant labourers, cannot be simply overlooked, the Court further said.
"Puffing” may be permissible in commercial advertising, but not in governance: Delhi High Court
The Delhi govt was, therefore, directed to take a decision within 6 weeks regarding whether they would be implementing the policy or not.
Invocation of Section 41A was resorted to as an arm-twisting method after Maheshwari did not respond to initial notice under Section 160 CrPC: Karnataka High Court
It is not in doubt that the Section 41A notice itself threatens punitive action and deprivation of liberty, which is a fundamental right: Karnataka High Court
Advocate General Ashutosh Kumbhakoni appearing for Maharashtra government submits that exclusivity cannot be given to a court for the scheduled offences under the NIA Act.
AG: Can we read the magistrate as ‘Court’ as mentioned under the UAPA Act?
The section 43D does not say that Court can be read in the place of magistrate as it does for the other terms.
The Manipur Police had booked Wangkhem under NSA over his Facebook post on cow dung/urine after the death of the BJP State president due to Covid-19.
The order was passed by a bench of C.J PV Sanjay Kumar and Justice KH Nobin Singh on a letter petition moved by wife of Wangkhem.
Earlier this week, the Supreme Court ordered the release of Manipuri activist Erendro Leichombam, who was also booked under the NSA for a Facebook post criticising BJP leaders for advocating cow-dung and cow-urine as cures for COVID.
Justice AM Khanwilkar led bench is hearing a plea filed by the mother of a five-year-old girl who was allegedly kidnapped, raped and murdered in Odisha, seeking a CBI inquiry into death #supremecourt#parimurdercase
Sr Adv Kapil Sibal: Chargesheet has been filed in this case. A protest petition could have been filed. Now it is a fashion to prefer a Article 32 plea after chargesheet is filed
Justice Khanwilkar: You can file a protest petition.
Sr Adv Mahesh Jethmalani: you asked me to file a SLP, we will do that. Please hear me at least. We will come in a SLP
Karnataka High Court to continue pronouncing order on maintainability of plea filed by Twitter's Manish Maheshwari challenging notice issued to him by Uttar Pradesh Police in case related to Ghaziabad assault video
Senior Advocate CV Nagesh reiterates that Twitter Inc does not hold shares in Twitter India. Shareholders in Twitter India are Twitter International Company (9,999 shares) and Twitter Ireland (1 share).