Supreme Court’s Special Bench headed by Justice Nageswara Rao to shortly hear its suo motu case regarding the Remediation of polluted rivers.

#SupremeCourt #RiverPollution
Senior Advocate Vikas Singh begins submissions.

#SupremeCourt #RiverPollution
Singh reads out entire judgement of the Supreme Court in Delhi Water Supply & Sewage vs. State Of Haryana for the benefit of the Bench.

#SupremeCourt #RiverPollution
Court: Please tell us after 26 years, what is the contempt?

The water released by Haryana was in accordance with the Order as found by a committee appointed by us.

#SupremeCourt #RiverPollution
Court: We are warning you, please advise the government to stop filing petition after petition. This the fourth time.

Singh: My Lord, why will I not seek legal recourse that is within my right?

#SupremeCourt #RiverPollution
Singh: Haryana is saying, we will use water for agriculture but not give to Delhi for drinking purposes.

80 Cusec was supposed to be coming through the river, and not a single cusec reached us.

Even according to the report only 37 cusec was reaching us.

#SupremeCourt
Singh: Upper #Yamuna Board says, we cannot do anything. They actually have no teeth.

#SupremeCourt #RiverPollution
Singh: I am assuming 370 Cusec is assumed to be delivered.

Still 80 Cusec is meant to come through the river. As per the report, there was only 37 Cusec coming.

#SupremeCourt #RiverPollution
Court: Mr. Vikas, you can't decide all this. You tell us how it is contempt.

#SupremeCourt #RiverPollution
Singh: Contempt is because Wazirabad was meant to be kept full. I have nothing more to say.

#SupremeCourt #RiverPollution
Senior Advocate Shyam Divan, begins submissions: I urge you to dismiss this. They keep coming to the Court without any basis.

It is a complete abuse of process.

#SupremeCourt #RiverPollution
Divan invites the Courts attention to the Report's observations and recommendations.

#SupremeCourt #RiverPollution
Divan: Subsequent to the Supreme Court Judgement-huge infrastructure has come up. Therefore, now it is upto the Delhi Jal Board how much water to direct to its plants.

#SupremeCourt #RiverPollution
As per the report, #Haryana is releasing more than 1000 cusecs of water, as per the Yamuna River Allocation Board, submits Divan.

"We are supplying water required from us, sometimes more."

#SupremeCourt #RiverPollution
Divan: The twin main piplelines and the carrier line channel are subsequent to the judgement. The transmission is not through the Yamuna.

The whole foundation of the case has been bypassed by a whole new water infrastructure.

#SupremeCourt #RiverPollution
Court: Please reply to the submissions of contempt, Mr. Divan.

Please reply to his submission that you are not supplying.

#SupremeCourt #RiverPollution
Divan: My sumbmissions are:

1) the minimum requirement is being supplied.

2) The order passed by this Court was based on the fact that the River Yamuna worked as a channel, that has now changed.

#SupremeCourt #RiverPollution
3) In 1996, the basic water plant was at Wazirabad pond, now newer technology is present.

4) Delhi has control over the local infrastructure, they can keep the Wazirabad pond full if they want to.

#SupremeCourt #RiverPollution
Divan: Repeatedly, this Delhi Jal Board keeps moving the Court. Meetings are held at the highest level.

#SupremeCourt #RiverPollution
Singh responds to the submissions: The direction we received in Delhi was that Delhi must be given as much water as required by the State.

#SupremeCourt #RiverPollution
Singh: I am not taking a single cusec in Delhi for agriculture. The intent of the Order was to ensure we have enough for domestic use.

#SupremeCourt #RiverPollution
Court: Yes, further negotiate with them. This contempt petition is dismissed.

#SupremeCourt #RiverPollution
Singh: Your Lordships, negotiations are not working, please do not dismiss this Contempt Petition.

#SupremeCourt #RiverPollution
Justice Nageswara Rao, while Sr. Advocate Vikas Singh continues to attempt arguing: Dismissed, dismissed.

#SupremeCourt #RiverPollution

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Bar & Bench

Bar & Bench Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @barandbench

23 Jul
BREAKING: Karnataka High Court holds that petition filed by Manish Maheshwari challenging Section 41A notice sent to him by UP Police is maintainable

#Twitter #karnatakahighcourt @TwitterIndia @Uppolice @manishm
Invocation of Section 41A was resorted to as an arm-twisting method after Maheshwari did not respond to initial notice under Section 160 CrPC: Karnataka High Court

@TwitterIndia @manishm @Uppolice
It is not in doubt that the Section 41A notice itself threatens punitive action and deprivation of liberty, which is a fundamental right: Karnataka High Court

#karnatakahighcourt #twitterindia @manishm @TwitterIndia
Read 4 tweets
23 Jul
#BombayHighCourt to continue hearing the application filed by #ElgarParishad accused Sudha Bharadwaj seeking default bail.

Hearing before Justices SS Shinde and NJ Jamadar.

#ElgarParishadcase
Advocate General Ashutosh Kumbhakoni appearing for Maharashtra government submits that exclusivity cannot be given to a court for the scheduled offences under the NIA Act.

#Elgarparishadcase #BombayHighCourt
AG: Can we read the magistrate as ‘Court’ as mentioned under the UAPA Act?
The section 43D does not say that Court can be read in the place of magistrate as it does for the other terms.

#Elgarparishadcase #BombayHighCourt
Read 18 tweets
23 Jul
Manipur High Court orders release of journalist Kishorchandra Wangkhem jailed under NSA for Facebook post crticising cow urine as #COVID cure

Reports @Areebuddin14

#ManipurHighCourt #Journalist

Read: bit.ly/3ztcG7C
The Manipur Police had booked Wangkhem under NSA over his Facebook post on cow dung/urine after the death of the BJP State president due to Covid-19.

The order was passed by a bench of C.J PV Sanjay Kumar and Justice KH Nobin Singh on a letter petition moved by wife of Wangkhem.
Earlier this week, the Supreme Court ordered the release of Manipuri activist Erendro Leichombam, who was also booked under the NSA for a Facebook post criticising BJP leaders for advocating cow-dung and cow-urine as cures for COVID.

Read: bit.ly/3hUHaJU
Read 4 tweets
23 Jul
Justice AM Khanwilkar led bench is hearing a plea filed by the mother of a five-year-old girl who was allegedly kidnapped, raped and murdered in Odisha, seeking a CBI inquiry into death
#supremecourt #parimurdercase
Sr Adv Kapil Sibal: Chargesheet has been filed in this case. A protest petition could have been filed. Now it is a fashion to prefer a Article 32 plea after chargesheet is filed
Justice Khanwilkar: You can file a protest petition.

Sr Adv Mahesh Jethmalani: you asked me to file a SLP, we will do that. Please hear me at least. We will come in a SLP
Read 8 tweets
23 Jul
Karnataka High Court to continue pronouncing order on maintainability of plea filed by Twitter's Manish Maheshwari challenging notice issued to him by Uttar Pradesh Police in case related to Ghaziabad assault video

#karnatakahighcourt @TwitterIndia @manishm @Uppolice @Twitter
Senior Advocate CV Nagesh reiterates that Twitter Inc does not hold shares in Twitter India. Shareholders in Twitter India are Twitter International Company (9,999 shares) and Twitter Ireland (1 share).

#Twitter #karnatakahighcourt @TwitterIndia
Justice G Narendar continues pronouncing order.

#Twitter #karnatakahighcourt
Read 24 tweets
23 Jul
Supreme Court Bench headed by Justice AM Khanwilkar is hearing an appeal challenging NGT order pertaining to the ban of firecrackers.

Justice Sanjiv Khanna: these are COVID times and its not a blanket ban on firecrackers.

#supremecourt #firecrackers
Sr Adv PS Narasimha: they say there is a total ban on firecrackers during COVID19

Justice Khanwilkar: it is only dependant air category. if its severe it will not be not allowed. It is aonly furthering the cause of our earlier judgment. There is no ban Mr Narasimha.
Justice Khanwilkar: there is no ban. Only ban to burn where quality is poor. When the air quality is moderate green crackers are allowed. In other areas it is allowed. Bann only in areas of higher than poor
#firecrackers #airpollution
Read 17 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(