I don't know about you, but we’re tracking 22 active lawsuits about new voter suppression bills passed so far this year. And it feels like a perfect morning to take a look at the cases and what laws they're challenging👇🧵
Also in the Sunshine State, college students and professors are fighting #HB233, claiming that the law's required annual surveys of political views of people on public college campuses in Florida violates their 1st and 14th Amendments rights. democracydocket.com/cases/florida-…
🍑Georgia is on our mind with 8 lawsuits challenging #SB202.
.@AAAJ_Atlanta filed the 4th lawsuit against the voter suppression law. Their complaint claims that #SB202's restrictions on voter ID, mail ballots, drop boxes and ballot collection violate the 14th and 15th Amendments and the Voting Rights Act. democracydocket.com/cases/georgia-…
.@VoteAmerica, @VoterCenter and the Center for Voter Information are the fifth group to sue Georgia over #SB202. Their lawsuit claims that the restrictions on absentee ballot applications violate the 1st and 14th Amendments. democracydocket.com/cases/georgia-…
More recently, the @CivilRights division of @TheJusticeDept filed their own lawsuit against Georgia's #SB202, the first federal intervention in new state voter suppression laws this year. The DOJ's lawsuit claims that the law violates the Voting Rights Act.democracydocket.com/cases/georgia-…
.@ACLU, on behalf of @wnativevoice and indigenous tribes in Montana, is challenging #HB176 and #HB530, two laws that disproportionately impact Native American voters in the state. They argue that the laws breach the Montana Constitution. democracydocket.com/cases/montana-…
.@forward_montana and local Montana voters and lawyers are suing the state over #SB319, a law that limits voter registration activities on college campuses and more. The complaint alleges that the law violates the 1st Amendment and the state constitution. democracydocket.com/cases/montana-…
🤠Deep in the heart of Texas, two lawsuits are challenging voter suppression laws.
@LULAC of Texas is challenging #SB1111, a law that enforces stricter residency & ID requirements. The lawsuit claims that the law violates the 1st, 14th and 26th Amendments.democracydocket.com/cases/texas-vo…
And the final lawsuit we're tracking is from @votedotorg and challenges Texas's new wet-signature requirement for voter registration applications in #HB3107. The group alleges that the law violates the 1st & 14th Amendments and the Civil Rights Act of 1964.democracydocket.com/cases/texas-on…
If a state passes a new voter suppression bill, we'll be tracking it and will keep you updated on any litigation challenging the law.
Stay alert on the fight against new voter suppression laws across the country with the Democracy Docket newsletter⤵️ democracydocket.com/subscribe-dd
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
On March 3, 2020, Hervis Rogers stepped in line to vote in the 2020 primary at Texas Southern University, a historically Black college in Houston, Texas. After 6 hours of waiting, Rogers cast his ballot at about 1:00 AM.
Rogers was arrested for voting in the 2018 general elections and the 2020 Democratic primaries while on parole for a felony conviction. Rogers had been on parole since 2004 and his parole ended in June 2020. In Texas, people with felony convictions/on parole cannot vote.
Texas Attorney General chose to prosecute Rogers, claiming that Rogers “knowingly” voted while ineligible.
Rogers said he was unaware that he was ineligible to vote while on parole.
Texas Senate State Affairs Committee is considering 10 amendments to #SB1. After amendments are considered, the committee will vote on advancing the bill to the Senate floor. #txlege#SuppressionSession
8 amendments have been passed so far. Most amendments add clarification or make small edits to provisions in #SB1. Amendment 9 introduced by Sen. Hall (R) has been pulled due to ongoing changes to state election code. Amendment 9 will be considered on the floor. #txlege
Further clarification is needed by the Secretary of State's Office on how Amendment 9 would impact elections and the monetary cost to counties before it will be considered. #txlege
J. KAGAN, dissenting: "So the Court decides this Voting Rights Act case at a perilous moment for the Nation’s commitment to equal citizenship. It decides this case in an era of voting-rights retrenchment—when too many States and localities are restricting..." 1/4
"access to voting in ways that will predictably deprive members of minority groups of equal access to the ballot box. If 'any racial discrimination in voting is too much,' as the Shelby County Court recited, then the Act still has much to do." 2/4
"Or more precisely, the fraction of the Act remaining—the Act as diminished by the Court’s hand. Congress never meant for Section 2 to bear all of the weight of the Act’s commitments..." 3/4
With @TheJusticeDept's lawsuit, there are now EIGHT cases fighting to preserve voters' rights in Georgia after the passage of voter suppression bill #SB202.
Learn who's involved and read through the original complaints below #gapol⤵️🍑🧵
"[T]he grab bag of voting restrictions that populate SB 202 make clear that the Bill was animated by an impermissible goal of restricting voting."democracydocket.com/cases/georgia-…
🚨ALERT: Texas Gov. Greg Abbot (R) recently announced he will convene a special session of the state legislature on July 8th.
Wondering how a TX special session works? Here’s what you need to know... 🧵👇 #txlege
In Texas, the governor has the power to call a special session after the regular legislative session ends if he thinks there are still laws that need to be passed.
The governor can convene the legislature at any time, with no notice, but with a few rules:
1. All special sessions last a maximum of 30 days. But Abbott can call as many sessions as he wants. So as soon as one ends, the next can begin.
The sessions can end before 30 days if the legislature has completed its work.