There are big changes coming to #ERCOT. Are they the right changes? Are they enough? And what do we know about it so far? @PUCTX and @ERCOT_ISO held a press conference today. Some thoughts on the presser and other recent events below. #txlege#txenergy 1/ statesman.com/story/news/202…
Been a busy month: The presser today, along with a 7/1 PUC work session and 7/13 Senate hearing, And another @PUCTX workshop this Monday on transmission planning and how rotating outages/load shedding are done. Agenda & presentations were posted today 2/ interchange.puc.texas.gov/Documents/5226…
Additionally, the ERCOT Roadmap with 60 action items (aka the 60 points of light) was released last week plus @EnergyUT's report on causes of the Feb outages. Whew. 3/
Short term: next week will be HOT. @ERCOT_ISO CEO said we'll have enough generation to meet demand and also said conservation alerts are "a tool we intend to use." They're trying to get the word out: alerts *don't* mean imminent grid collapse. 4/ houstonchronicle.com/business/energ…
But the public is understandably nervous and experiencing some collective PTSD from being without power and water for days. Several questions from reporters were about trust. "We've got to earn it back," said Chair Lake. Indeed.
I'm worried there's alert fatigue. We'll see... 5/
Also today, Chair Lake said there will NOT be a capacity market in ERCOT. Said it was outside the scope of the legislation passed (SB3) and was not under consideration. Don't think that's been said before so I think it's newsworthy. #energytwitter#txenergy 6/
Next week's wild cards:
How much demand do we actually have and how close are the forecasts?
How many thermal outages are there? (If it's like June, there will be rolling outages but hopefully thermal does better)
How much wind and solar is do we get? 7/
Next week, when the peak approaches, lots of demand will go offline. That's because of "4CP" or 4 coincident peaks. Much of large commercial & industrial bills are from demand charges: whatever they use when the grid hits it's peak is what they're charged *all year*. 8/
It's called 4CP because it's an average of June, July, Aug., and Sept. Because July until now has been mild, the peak will almost certainly be set next week, causing lets of demand to reduce.
NOTE: We get none of this in the winter and nobody knows exactly how much we get. 9/
How much thermal generation will be offline? What grid planners expect to be "reliable" and "dispatchable" has been anything but in June, April, and Feb. About 15% of the termal fleet was offline in June and about 40% in Apr and Feb.
Will thermals show up next week? 10/
And how much wind and solar will we get? There's a lot more solar coming soon. We're at about 6.5GW now but we could see a little more next week. Wind typically hits a low point midday when solar peaks and picks up in the evening as the sun sets. Will that be the case next week?
Longer term: can we get more transmission to remove bottlenecks & bring more supply to meet demand? ERCOT listed this as an action item. PUC will address it in its workshop on tranmission Mon. with a focus on the Rio Grande Valley. #RGV#txlege 12/
ERCOT CEO Jones said “We want to look at our transmission planning process to push at the edges of that process to stay ahead... I’ve got a keen focus on the Valley because I believe we have underserved that area for the last 15 years.” #Txenergy#RGV 13/
Also on transmission, #txlege passed SB1281 to pave the way for more of it, and @GinaForAustin got an amendment onto the budget requiring the PUC to study interconnecting to other grids. They're required to determine "if reliability could be increased" through interconnection 14/
Also on the agenda for the @PUCTX workshop on Monday: load shedding. Presumably, they'll talk about how to rotate outages better but part of the discussion should be #demandresponse. Let's shed load customers are *willing* to shed FIRST! There's huge potential. #txlege 15/
At the 7/1 PUC work session, former PUC Chair @patwood3 said "storage + price responsive load is the missing interface in this very supply driven market." Well said. Two sides of the coin: supply and demand. Gotta address both or you have, at best, a half solution. #txlege 16/
And what about storage? It has potential to increase resiliency of the grid and there's a lot coming. Will it make a difference next week? Can we get long duration storage to help us next winter? Cmsr McAdams cited storage as a possible help during the Senate hearing. #txlege 17/
Chairman Lake said at the 7/1 work session: "Incentivize and pay for the results you want not how you get to the results." If the @PUCTX follows that recipe, there will be a mix of solutions and our grid will be more resilient. #txlege#txenergy 18/
The work session on Monday will be interesting. I'll try to tweet about it as it happens. It can be viewed (along with the 7/1 work session and today's presser, as well as open meetings) here. texasadmin.com/tx/puct/ #txlege#txenergy 19/end 🧵
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Does anyone have an update to the @TXAG investigation of price gouging? Four months ago, the AG said: "I am expanding the scope of my investigation to include the natural gas industry." Are there any results from this investigation? #txlege#txenergy 1/ texasattorneygeneral.gov/news/releases/…
Section 17.46(b)(27) of the Bus. & Comm. Code defines deceptive trade practices to include: "(A) selling or leasing fuel... at an exorbitant or excessive price; or (B) demanding an exorbitant or excessive price in connection with the sale...of fuel..." 2/ statutes.capitol.texas.gov/Docs/BC/htm/BC…
Natural gas prices were 100-300x normal prices in Feb. I don't know whether that meets the legal standard for price gouging but it's worth discussing. Look at this tweet and the next couple from a House hearing following the storms #txlege#txenergy 3/
Texas' energy woes will persist, and costs will be higher, unless demand side resources like #energyefficiency and #demandresponse, #solar and #storage, are deployed at scale. Alison Siverstein wrote a great piece in @UtilityDive about this. A quick 🧵
Silverstein is a former FERC & PUC staffer w/ decades of energy experience. She wrote that Texas policymakers and the @PUCTX and @ERCOT_ISO need to "shore up grid reliability by aggressively managing electricity demand, not just throwing money at supply-side measures." #txenergy
She writes that over the last decade TX population increased 16% while energy use increased 20%. Much of that increase is driven by inefficient homes & buildings. We have #energyefficiency programs in Texas that deliver savings at 1 penny per kWh. Try to buy energy for that!
Chairman Lake says the meeting today is a venue for discussion, a forum for consideration of ideas, not for taking action, which will stay in the more formal open meetings.
Commissioner McAdams agrees that this is a good way to discuss things before decisions are made which gives the public more chance to weigh in.
Public comment begins.
Rita Robles, a resident of Denver Harbor, a Houston neighborhood, addresses the commissioners. Says many people in her neighborhood had busted pipes. One neighbor still hasn't been able to fix her pipes nearly four months later.
Patrick says he will only work on these things if we're helping ratepayers. Great.
He's indignant about House not taking ratepayer assistance program which was only brought up in the last few days. It's been 100 days since the storm. Where was this proposal in April/early May?
It makes sense to help ratepayers. The Senate had #SB243 to increase #energyefficiency programs which helps customers to save money AND make their homes more resilient. Never got out of committee. The House had #HB3460, the Power Act, to give direct payments to Texans
🚨Hold the phone, there's an outside the bounds section (not in either the House or Senate versions) on p. 63-66 that appears to finance ratepayer assistance through a utility tax that would otherwise go to GR.
it appears in the side by side starting on p. 63 but does NOT appear in the Conference Committee report bill text. There is no Subchapter O in the bill text.
Is this a drafting error? Could be some high drama tonight on this. House rules are clear you can't amend a CCR. #txlege
At the bottom of the section of Subchapter O in the side-by-side page 66, it says this will be funded by a utility tax which I'm told raises $300m year. So they'd bond and then pay back bonds with a utility tax. however... (cont)
#SB3 Headlines:
- Weaker gas regs (House version) are IN the bill.
- Most egregious anti-renewable language is OUT of the bill.
- one minor #demandresponse provision kept IN the bill
- #energyefficiency and most local power gen/storage backup OUT of the bill.
more details soon
Conf report kept House language that required gas supply to be mapped by the Electricity Supply Chain Mapping Committee before any regs are created. Cmte report due 1/1/22, @txrrc rules 6 months later. There will be no gas regulations required before this coming winter.