#SupremeCourt to hear its suo motu case regarding pending vacancies in Districts and State Consumer Redressal Commission Across India. #suomotu#vacancies
Application by Patiala District Bar Association has been taken up.
Adv Shirin Khajuria: the president of the consumer forum is retiring and there will be no judicial member
Justice Hemant Gupta: Kiran Sibal is a member with a judicial background. I know her personally and i have checked the website
Khajuria: vacancies have to be notified before 6 month
Justice Kaul: please unmute state of Punjab
Adv Atul Nanda: please give me 15 days to respond.
Khajuria: Please extend the tenure of the member of the president.
Justice Kaul: no we cannot do that. we are giving time and it will be wrapped up in 15 days
Khajuria: there needs to be an advertisement
Justice Gupta: there is no ad required for the chairperson
Justice Gupta: Ms Khajuria, are you interested in functioning of the commission or this proxy application?
Justice Kaul: Mr Nanda, do you have to advertise for the post of the chairman?
Nanda: in mind, it is not required. But if required we will distribute among the retired judges
Justice Kaul: 15 days is enough
Nanda: no problem if its three weeks
Justice Kaul: we take this statement on record. (to Adv Nanda for Punjab)
Justice Kaul: applications have been disposed off.
Adv Khajuria: please keep it pending till the appointment is done
Justice Kaul: this cannot go on. if we have to issue notice to each bar then how will we carry on. if it does not happen you have liberty to come here again
Justice Kaul: List the case after three weeks. The states who are not filling vacancies we will take action. Please do the needful.
Invocation of Section 41A was resorted to as an arm-twisting method after Maheshwari did not respond to initial notice under Section 160 CrPC: Karnataka High Court
It is not in doubt that the Section 41A notice itself threatens punitive action and deprivation of liberty, which is a fundamental right: Karnataka High Court
Advocate General Ashutosh Kumbhakoni appearing for Maharashtra government submits that exclusivity cannot be given to a court for the scheduled offences under the NIA Act.
AG: Can we read the magistrate as ‘Court’ as mentioned under the UAPA Act?
The section 43D does not say that Court can be read in the place of magistrate as it does for the other terms.
The Manipur Police had booked Wangkhem under NSA over his Facebook post on cow dung/urine after the death of the BJP State president due to Covid-19.
The order was passed by a bench of C.J PV Sanjay Kumar and Justice KH Nobin Singh on a letter petition moved by wife of Wangkhem.
Earlier this week, the Supreme Court ordered the release of Manipuri activist Erendro Leichombam, who was also booked under the NSA for a Facebook post criticising BJP leaders for advocating cow-dung and cow-urine as cures for COVID.
Justice AM Khanwilkar led bench is hearing a plea filed by the mother of a five-year-old girl who was allegedly kidnapped, raped and murdered in Odisha, seeking a CBI inquiry into death #supremecourt#parimurdercase
Sr Adv Kapil Sibal: Chargesheet has been filed in this case. A protest petition could have been filed. Now it is a fashion to prefer a Article 32 plea after chargesheet is filed
Justice Khanwilkar: You can file a protest petition.
Sr Adv Mahesh Jethmalani: you asked me to file a SLP, we will do that. Please hear me at least. We will come in a SLP
Karnataka High Court to continue pronouncing order on maintainability of plea filed by Twitter's Manish Maheshwari challenging notice issued to him by Uttar Pradesh Police in case related to Ghaziabad assault video
Senior Advocate CV Nagesh reiterates that Twitter Inc does not hold shares in Twitter India. Shareholders in Twitter India are Twitter International Company (9,999 shares) and Twitter Ireland (1 share).