#BombayHighCourt to continue hearing posthumously the bail pleas filed by Bhima Koregaon accused Father #StanSwamy kept pending to ascertain the veracity of claims of negligence by NIA and Taloja Prison Authorities towards Swamy’s health.

@NIA_India
Bench of Justices SS Shinde and NJ Jamadar to hear the pleas.

Sr Adv Mihir Desai to appear for Swamy.

ASG Anil Singh to appear for NIA.

Chief PP Aruna Pai to appear for State of Maharashtra.

#BombayHighCourt #StanSwamy
Hearing begins.
Desai: there are four requests I have today pertaining to the investigation under 176 of crpc.

1. Allow Fr mascerhanas, who is next kin for Swamy be allowed to participate.
2. That the investigation be conducted in compliance of NHRC guidelines.
3. That since the death was in Mumbai, the Magistrate for 176 enquiry be from Mumbai.
4. That the report be submitted to the High Court.
Desai: Now if there is no objection to this looking at the context of the case, I need not waste the time of the court. Otherwise I will make my case.
ASG: I have two submissions.
I have no difficulty because the law provides for the guidelines.
It is as per CrPC. There is no question of not following this.
ASG: As for the submission of report, I have two submissions.

Court asks him to respond on each issue individually.
ASG: I have no objection to 2 & 3. But on 4, I want to submit that there are only two appeals pending in court now.
ASG: Please see section 394 of CrPC. Every other appeal under 377 and 378 shall abate on death of the accused.
Provided the appeal is against the sentence or conviction
ASG: This appeal is not for sentence or conviction.

Court: But then this appeal is under which act?
ASG: this is under NiA act but CrPC will apply.
But since this appeal is abated, there is no question of having a report in this appeal.
Court asks Chief PP, she says that she will adopt ASG’s submissions.

Court: but if his appeal goes everything goes, nothing remains, even his points will not remain.
Desai: I am invoking supervisory jurisdiction of the High Court. Constitutional jurisdiction. May not be in the strict sense of appeal, but in supervisory jurisdiction.
Desai: Way back in Charan Lal’s case, in Aruna Shanbaug case and whether she was seeking passive euthanasia, it was held that the High Court was parens patriae for all these.
Desai: The HC would continue to be parent of the deceased and continue to operate in that…
Court: Can you send a two page note? So that we will ponder on that.. we understand Art 215 and whether you can convert the appeal. There is a justice that liberal approach is to be adopted. Can a writ petition be maintainable…
Court: whether any magistrate has initiated?

PP: No

Court: Was a Post mortem conducted as per procedure?

PP: Yes
Court: Give it to the otherside also.

Chief PP: We will need sometime to think over it.

Court: We will do one thing, we will keep it on August 4, 2021.
ASG’s office is facing some technical issue.

ASG: I will reach Courtroom in 2 mins.

Court: We are not passing any order today…
ASG: My submission is that any personal comment or officer of the court… (there is technical issue).
ASG: I have two submissions nothign to do with the matter. Any private comment by the Court or the officer of the Court.
ASG: In a pending investigation, on media and social media there are comments being made…
Court (to Desai): We have heard only.. we have not made any personal comment against any advocate.
Chief PP: I have been told he is on his way to the Court.
Since there is technical difficulty from ASG’s end he is coming to Court room to make submissions.
Court: We have introduced hybrid system…
Yesterday we tested..
Desai: That is good actually…

ASG reaches the court.
ASG: Any personal comments from the Court…

Court: personal comment about?

ASG: about the activity in the matter.
Court: I have said so, as far as legal issues are concerned and the UAPA provisions, we have never made comments. If what I said hurt you, I will take it back, do you want that?
Court: I will take it back whatever I said personally.. we are also human beings.. whenever something like this happens…
We have never made any comments against PP or ASG.. you appear before us everyday..
Court: We appreciate your conduct in court. We have always admired you do not get attached to the case.
And for other things we are hearing on August 4.
ASG: I am only on the public perception created..
Court: We always try to keep a balanced approach.
ASG says he has absolutely no grievance from the Court. The court has always been transparent.
Hearing ends.
"We are also human beings; I will take back personal comments:" Justice SS Shinde to NIA on remarks made while hearing Father Stan Swamy case

report by @Neha_Jozie

#bombayhc #BhimaKoregaon #stanswamy

Read full story: bityl.co/7yav

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Bar & Bench

Bar & Bench Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @barandbench

23 Jul
BREAKING: Karnataka High Court holds that petition filed by Manish Maheshwari challenging Section 41A notice sent to him by UP Police is maintainable

#Twitter #karnatakahighcourt @TwitterIndia @Uppolice @manishm
Invocation of Section 41A was resorted to as an arm-twisting method after Maheshwari did not respond to initial notice under Section 160 CrPC: Karnataka High Court

@TwitterIndia @manishm @Uppolice
It is not in doubt that the Section 41A notice itself threatens punitive action and deprivation of liberty, which is a fundamental right: Karnataka High Court

#karnatakahighcourt #twitterindia @manishm @TwitterIndia
Read 4 tweets
23 Jul
#BombayHighCourt to continue hearing the application filed by #ElgarParishad accused Sudha Bharadwaj seeking default bail.

Hearing before Justices SS Shinde and NJ Jamadar.

#ElgarParishadcase
Advocate General Ashutosh Kumbhakoni appearing for Maharashtra government submits that exclusivity cannot be given to a court for the scheduled offences under the NIA Act.

#Elgarparishadcase #BombayHighCourt
AG: Can we read the magistrate as ‘Court’ as mentioned under the UAPA Act?
The section 43D does not say that Court can be read in the place of magistrate as it does for the other terms.

#Elgarparishadcase #BombayHighCourt
Read 18 tweets
23 Jul
Supreme Court’s Special Bench headed by Justice Nageswara Rao to shortly hear its suo motu case regarding the Remediation of polluted rivers.

#SupremeCourt #RiverPollution
Senior Advocate Vikas Singh begins submissions.

#SupremeCourt #RiverPollution
Singh reads out entire judgement of the Supreme Court in Delhi Water Supply & Sewage vs. State Of Haryana for the benefit of the Bench.

#SupremeCourt #RiverPollution
Read 24 tweets
23 Jul
Manipur High Court orders release of journalist Kishorchandra Wangkhem jailed under NSA for Facebook post crticising cow urine as #COVID cure

Reports @Areebuddin14

#ManipurHighCourt #Journalist

Read: bit.ly/3ztcG7C
The Manipur Police had booked Wangkhem under NSA over his Facebook post on cow dung/urine after the death of the BJP State president due to Covid-19.

The order was passed by a bench of C.J PV Sanjay Kumar and Justice KH Nobin Singh on a letter petition moved by wife of Wangkhem.
Earlier this week, the Supreme Court ordered the release of Manipuri activist Erendro Leichombam, who was also booked under the NSA for a Facebook post criticising BJP leaders for advocating cow-dung and cow-urine as cures for COVID.

Read: bit.ly/3hUHaJU
Read 4 tweets
23 Jul
Justice AM Khanwilkar led bench is hearing a plea filed by the mother of a five-year-old girl who was allegedly kidnapped, raped and murdered in Odisha, seeking a CBI inquiry into death
#supremecourt #parimurdercase
Sr Adv Kapil Sibal: Chargesheet has been filed in this case. A protest petition could have been filed. Now it is a fashion to prefer a Article 32 plea after chargesheet is filed
Justice Khanwilkar: You can file a protest petition.

Sr Adv Mahesh Jethmalani: you asked me to file a SLP, we will do that. Please hear me at least. We will come in a SLP
Read 8 tweets
23 Jul
Karnataka High Court to continue pronouncing order on maintainability of plea filed by Twitter's Manish Maheshwari challenging notice issued to him by Uttar Pradesh Police in case related to Ghaziabad assault video

#karnatakahighcourt @TwitterIndia @manishm @Uppolice @Twitter
Senior Advocate CV Nagesh reiterates that Twitter Inc does not hold shares in Twitter India. Shareholders in Twitter India are Twitter International Company (9,999 shares) and Twitter Ireland (1 share).

#Twitter #karnatakahighcourt @TwitterIndia
Justice G Narendar continues pronouncing order.

#Twitter #karnatakahighcourt
Read 24 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(