Item 4—Proposed #TRIPSwaiver on some intellectual property protection for #COVID19—status report & request for a decision to extend the discussion in the intellectual property (TRIPS) council.
More ⬇️ on the draft text of the #TRIPSwaiver for #COVID19—the text, the discussion in the TRIPS Council (also comprising all @wto members), and why a General Council decision is needed:
Mea culpa—I had thought the least-developed country decision was simply about extending a transition period (that’s what the TRIPS Council decision was called), not an Art.9 “waiver”. I was wrong. Apologies if you saw that tweet.
Items 7 and 8—on responses to #COVID19, including an EU🇪🇺 paper.
To find the papers listed, search WTO documents online at docs.wto.org/dol2fe/Pages/F…, paste or type the document number (eg WT/GC/W/823) into the “document symbol” field.
Item 14—“The legal status of ‘joint statement initiatives’ and their negotiated outcomes”
A repeat outing for a paper by India & South Africa criticising “plurilateral” negotiations in subsets of the WTO membership, when no “multilateral” consensus
I can take defeat. Boy have I supported defeated teams in my time. I did wonder whether it was a good idea to give penalty-taking to players who had just come on and had hardly touched the ball.
And yet I remind myself:
1/7
I remind myself:
• England were never actually defeated in any match. Only on penalties
• Last night, England didn’t play well for most of the 2nd half. In the semis, Spain lost on penalties to Italy but kept Italy pretty quiet during the match. England couldn’t do that
2/7
I remind myself:
• Italy deserved to win the tournament. They were the best team overall from start to finish, and on balance better last night.
• England were probably second best in the tournament, although they had a poor game against Scotland and faded last night.
3/7