Justice SK Kaul led bench of #SupremeCourt hears plea filed by Yatin Oza against the decision of the Gujarat High Court to revoke his senior designation and also the HC judgment holding him guilty of contempt of court for his statements #SupremeCourt#YatinOza
AM Singhvi: Mr Nikhil informed that it has been kept for directions only. 9 months plus have lapsed. There has been bigger punishment than any other punishment. To be out of town and out of practice is easier, than to be in the same city where you’ve practiced.
Justice Kaul: We had said that see if you could use the good offices to see if something could be worked out.
Adv Nikhil Goel: It was reiterated again, by the full court.
SC: We will record that you don’t want to file any counter then? That full-court reconsidered the matter on June 20th and move ahead?
SC: Stay application in contempt matter to continue till conclusion of matter. Adv Goel says matter was reconsidered on June 20th and stand taken earlier has been reiterated.
Supreme Court asks how much counsels will take to argue
SC: Synopsis need to be filed in advance so that arguments are confined to the synopsis
Justice Kaul: Mr Arvind Datar and Mr AM Singhvi we will hear your for one hour, between the two of you. He has said they (Gujarat HC) have decided to reiterate their position. They are not ready to show any compassion. so we have to move on this basis..
Justice Kaul: 20 volumes of SCC produced in a year and that is a problem. Cite your best judgment and argue and stick to the synopsis.
Error in tweet: Supreme Court asks how much TIME will counsels take to argue
SC: Synopsis need to be filed in advance so that arguments are confined to the synopsis
SC: Counter affidavits if any to be filed. Rejoinder within a week after that. Schedule of hearing has been set out. Short synopsis to be filed in not more than 3 pages. Mr Datar and Mr Singhvi to argue for one hour between them. Intervention application to take 15 minutes.
Sr Adv Datar: Like US Supreme Court we will argue for 50 minutes and reserve 10 minutes for counter or rejoinder.
SC: We will hear the case on September 1, 2021. After both the admission boards are over. Tentatively 12.30 but time is after the admission board wraps up.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
#BombayHighCourt is hearing plea filed by Rashmi Shukla seeking quashing of the FIR registered by #MumbaiPolice against unknown persons for leaking information pertaining to police postings in the State.
ASG Anil Singh appearing for CBI submits two letters written by #CBI to the Mumbai Police seeking certain documents pertaining to Shukla for their investigation.
ASG submits that the documents which have been sought from the administration were not handed over.
Court: Mr. Singh, why don’t you file a short application with these documents..
We get your sum and substance that the State is not co-operating..
Delhi High Court to hear petition seeking directions to Twitter to comply with Information Technology (Intermediary Guidelines and Digital Media Ethics Code) Rules, 2021
On the last date of hearing, the Court had directed "interim" officers appointed by Twitter Inc under IT Rules, 2021 to file affidavits stating that they will be responsible for dealing with any grievances raised.
Senior Advocate Sajan Poovayya appears for Twitter. Two affidavits have been filed as regards Chief Compliance Officer and Grievance Officer. We have indicated that we will no longer use "interim" for the officers.
Delhi High Court to hear plea by PayPal challenging a Financial Intelligence Unit order imposing a penalty of Rs 96 lakh on it for not registering itself as a “reporting entity” under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002.
#SupremeCourt is hearing the plea filed by @amazon against #DelhiHighCourt March 22 order which stayed Single Judge’s order restraining @FutureGroup from going ahead with the 24,713 crore merger with Reliance Retail
Sr Adv Harish Salve: please take a look at the Raffles Design International vs Educomp Professional Education delivered by Delhi High Court in October 2016
The same bench will also hear Singh’s plea seeking to quash the FIR registered against him under the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989.
#SupremeCourt to shortly deliver judgment on a plea by Kerala Govt to withdraw the assembly ruckus case where LDF legislators including education minister V Sivankutty are named as accused.
V Sivankutty, KT Jaleel, EP Jayarajan, Kunhammad Master, CK Sadasivan and K Ajith are named as accused of indulging in vandalism in the assembly
The plea is against a Kerala High Court order which had dismissed the State's petition against an order of rejection by the Chief Judicial Magistrate's Court at Thiruvananthapuram, seeking permission to withdraw prosecution against the accused, including sitting ministers.