2/ when I was an Epidemic Intelligence Service Officer at the CDC, I investigated lots of outbreaks, and every one would have a symptom checklist
A surprisingly high number of people with a diagnosed infection will say YES to a variety of symptoms
Fatigue?
Headache?
Fogginess?
3/ many of these reported complaints would have absolutely nothing to do with their infection.
But recall bias is super powerful, and respondents often feel like they're supposed to say "yes". So they do.
4/ if 30% of the world will get COVID, do we think that 20% or more of them (one out of every 15 people alive today) are going to have long term sequelae?
Are we seeing an epidemic of brain fogginess? Will SAT scores decline?
This study doesn't convince me.
What would?
5/ the right study design?
take a random sample of people who do NOT have laboratory diagnosed history of covid (remember, we probably have 3-5 infections for every diagnosed case)
Ask Qs 1st.
Then do serology test.
The diff in sx b/w serology + vs - is attributable to covid
6/ this is not a difficult study to do.
I continue to be baffled that we don't have an ongoing effort to identify "what's the question" for each phase of this pandemic, and dedicate targeted field epidemiology to answering them quickly and well.
"Each symptom was present in at least 35% of the students within the last seven days before the survey. However, there was no statistical difference comparing the reported symptoms between seropositive students and seronegative students" medrxiv.org/content/10.110…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
TY @bijans for spotting the "full pdf" download button.
3/ what do we learn?
The mysterious "other data" for high viral load in breakthrough cases came from a 4th of July outbreak in Provincetown (Barnstable, Mass) where the “vast majority” of the new cases were among fully vaccinated individuals
2/ MACRA was a true milestone, and a concept that I still support- instead of artificially capping medical inflation (and then not having the guts to actually see doc pay cuts) lets create 2 paths- a "pay for performance" base and an incentivized alternative payment model track.
3/ But 3 seemingly technical details fundamentally sapped the potential impact of this huge bill.
classic behavioral economics- the impact of an incentive is not just proportional to its size, but also its cost, uncertainty, and delay
2/ in this article, Joseph Kannarkat and I break down all the tools that the Biden administration and @SecBecerra have to address competition beyond antitrust reviews
2/ Why do I think it's "The Question" of this moment for field epi to try to answer?
I'm going to be joining @Bob_Wachter@cmyeaton@inthebubblepod tomorrow in our continuing "Safe or Not Safe" series, and Variant vs Vaccine will make all the difference
1/ COVID Deaths are lower than horrible peaks, but seem to have plateau'd- as cases rise in several states are we due for another surge in deaths?
I don't think so.
(vaccines work)
2/ It's important to remember just how much deaths lag infections. Many of the deaths being reported today will have first become infected a month ago, or even longer
The death data does not yet reflect the big surge in vaccine administration that happened in the past few weeks
3/ The recent surge in vaccinations has been impressive, and the group with the highest vaccination rates (appropriately) are the 65+
As @aslavitt46 reported, 73% of elderly vaccinated now (and 36% of adults) 👏👏👏
1/ this is the most detailed description of the lab-leak hypothesis I have seen (and I don't buy it)
It posits a "chopped-and-channeled version of RaTG13 or the miners’ virus that included elements that would make it thrive and even rampage in people?" nymag.com/intelligencer/…
2/ to be clear, I've seen first-hand-in a 7 month-old baby-the scourge of a lab-produced bioweapon that was exfilitrated (anthrax 2001).
I agree w @mlipsitch position that the risks of creating Gain of Function pathogens w increased infectivity/deadliness outweigh the benefits
3/ beyond artful prose and connect-the-dots suggestions, here's the idea:
That a bat virus sample (RaTG13) was manipulated in Wuhan lab to be more infectious through the lego-block addition of key genetic mediators of human infection