1/ What percent of vaccinated people who get infected with covid will have long-term symptoms?

I don't know, but I highly doubt that it's 19%.

Here's why I say that, and what the *right* study design would be for answering that question.
2/ when I was an Epidemic Intelligence Service Officer at the CDC, I investigated lots of outbreaks, and every one would have a symptom checklist

A surprisingly high number of people with a diagnosed infection will say YES to a variety of symptoms

Fatigue?
Headache?
Fogginess?
3/ many of these reported complaints would have absolutely nothing to do with their infection.

But recall bias is super powerful, and respondents often feel like they're supposed to say "yes". So they do.
4/ if 30% of the world will get COVID, do we think that 20% or more of them (one out of every 15 people alive today) are going to have long term sequelae?

Are we seeing an epidemic of brain fogginess? Will SAT scores decline?

This study doesn't convince me.

What would?
5/ the right study design?

take a random sample of people who do NOT have laboratory diagnosed history of covid (remember, we probably have 3-5 infections for every diagnosed case)

Ask Qs 1st.
Then do serology test.
The diff in sx b/w serology + vs - is attributable to covid
6/ this is not a difficult study to do.

I continue to be baffled that we don't have an ongoing effort to identify "what's the question" for each phase of this pandemic, and dedicate targeted field epidemiology to answering them quickly and well.
7/ TY @djc795

"Each symptom was present in at least 35% of the students within the last seven days before the survey. However, there was no statistical difference comparing the reported symptoms between seropositive students and seronegative students"
medrxiv.org/content/10.110…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Farzad Mostashari

Farzad Mostashari Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Farzad_MD

30 Jul
1/ Like many others, I've been frustrated that we haven't seen the data behind the CDC's new recommendations. Parsing exact wording in transcripts is🤦

We're told there will be a release tomorrow but thanks to the @washingtonpost there's an internal CDC document to parse tonight Image
2/ The article by @yabutaleb7 @Carolynyjohnson @JoelAchenbach is here:
washingtonpost.com/health/2021/07…

TY @bijans for spotting the "full pdf" download button.
3/ what do we learn?

The mysterious "other data" for high viral load in breakthrough cases came from a 4th of July outbreak in Provincetown (Barnstable, Mass) where the “vast majority” of the new cases were among fully vaccinated individuals

cc @zeynep
thehill.com/homenews/state… Image
Read 16 tweets
7 Jul
1/ Our national quality/value program (MACRA) is broken

Most people just complain about its shortcomings, but @Travis_Broome comes up with an elegant, grounded way to fix its biggest flaws

Apply behavioral economics, use virtual groups, lay path to APMs ajmc.com/view/macra-has…
2/ MACRA was a true milestone, and a concept that I still support- instead of artificially capping medical inflation (and then not having the guts to actually see doc pay cuts) lets create 2 paths- a "pay for performance" base and an incentivized alternative payment model track.
3/ But 3 seemingly technical details fundamentally sapped the potential impact of this huge bill.

classic behavioral economics- the impact of an incentive is not just proportional to its size, but also its cost, uncertainty, and delay

MACRA stunk on all counts here.
Read 14 tweets
19 May
1/ "Federal antitrust oversight has proved inadequate at preventing anticompetitive effects across the health care sector" per @commonwealthfnd

What else can the federal government do, given the difficulty of passing healthcare legislation?

Plenty.
commonwealthfund.org/blog/2021/fede…
2/ in this article, Joseph Kannarkat and I break down all the tools that the Biden administration and @SecBecerra have to address competition beyond antitrust reviews

jamanetwork.com/journals/jama-…
3/ first of all, if the Biden administration chooses to elevate health care competition as a priority, it may garner rare bipartisan support.

This is an issue that has support from left (@ZekeEmanuel) and right (@Avik) thought leaders and legislators.
Read 8 tweets
11 Apr
1/ in our continued COVID field epidemiology series

"What's the question?"

April 2021 edition: "Are the vaccines effective against the variants?"

We have wet lab data, (limited) clinical trials reports, but what about field epi?

What epi design/surveillance would answer it?
2/ Why do I think it's "The Question" of this moment for field epi to try to answer?

I'm going to be joining @Bob_Wachter @cmyeaton @inthebubblepod tomorrow in our continuing "Safe or Not Safe" series, and Variant vs Vaccine will make all the difference

3/ I am 100% certain that everything I am saying here is much better understood by city/state epidemiologists @CSTEnews and @CDCgov experts.

But they are too busy to tweet, aren't free to talk openly, and may not control their own work/ resources.

And that's exactly the problem
Read 16 tweets
29 Mar
1/ COVID Deaths are lower than horrible peaks, but seem to have plateau'd- as cases rise in several states are we due for another surge in deaths?

I don't think so.

(vaccines work)
2/ It's important to remember just how much deaths lag infections. Many of the deaths being reported today will have first become infected a month ago, or even longer

The death data does not yet reflect the big surge in vaccine administration that happened in the past few weeks
3/ The recent surge in vaccinations has been impressive, and the group with the highest vaccination rates (appropriately) are the 65+

As @aslavitt46 reported, 73% of elderly vaccinated now (and 36% of adults) 👏👏👏
Read 5 tweets
3 Mar
1/ this is the most detailed description of the lab-leak hypothesis I have seen (and I don't buy it)

It posits a "chopped-and-channeled version of RaTG13 or the miners’ virus that included elements that would make it thrive and even rampage in people?"
nymag.com/intelligencer/…
2/ to be clear, I've seen first-hand-in a 7 month-old baby-the scourge of a lab-produced bioweapon that was exfilitrated (anthrax 2001).

I agree w @mlipsitch position that the risks of creating Gain of Function pathogens w increased infectivity/deadliness outweigh the benefits ImageImage
3/ beyond artful prose and connect-the-dots suggestions, here's the idea:

That a bat virus sample (RaTG13) was manipulated in Wuhan lab to be more infectious through the lego-block addition of key genetic mediators of human infection

But that's not what the sequence looks like Image
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(