2/ Research shows: a person's home country explains *two-thirds* of the variation of income differences between all people in the world ourworldindata.org/poverty-growth…
This means where you are born is more important for how poor or rich you are than *everything else put together*.
3/ If you do have a high income, you have the opportunity to give some of your money away to support others who were less lucky than you.
4/ @GiveWell is a research team that finds the charities that make the biggest difference per each dollar or euro that you donate.
On their site you find their recommended charities and their *great research* of how they arrived at these recommendations givewell.org
5/ Giving via Givewell is one way to donate that I'd recommend.
On their site you find all the research and you can choose exactly where you want to donate your money to.
– But they also focus on other areas and as a donor you trust them to make decisions for you
– I pay into the 'Fund' with a recurring transfer every month
7/ This chart shows just how large the differences are between people who were born into a country that saw large growth in the past decades and a place that only saw only little economic growth.
In their mission statement the @Guardian says that their work wants to "improve the world, not just critique it" and they want to "bring about a more hopeful future".
👇 This is their front page right now.
I am skeptical that their work "brings about a more hopeful future".
I was tweeting the above cause I want to achieve what the Guardian says in their mission.
I want my work to improve the world and I want to bring about a more hopeful future.
A chart from a very interesting, ongoing research project of Roger Fouquet at the LSE lse.ac.uk/granthaminstit…
He estimates the 'Net Domestic Consumer Surplus' – as a measure of economic welfare to complement GDP – for the UK over the last 300 years.
It's a very ambitious project – he has to do extensive historical data work to reconstruct the consumption of goods and services over the last three centuries.
As Roger mentions in the link above, he is looking for funding to finish this work.
Do you know a person or an institution that would be interested to fund this research project?
For several energy metrics of key importance, *only* the @IEA publishes global data.
Below is a list of them.
The issue is that despite the fact that the IEA is largely publicly funded, they put this data behind paywalls.
They are therefore not part of the public discourse.
The fact that the @IEA charges thousands of Euros per dataset is due to their funders (the energy ministers) requesting that the IEA finances part of their budget through the sales of data.
During the rapid outbreak the test positivitiy rate also increased rapidly. This has now largely stopped.
I'd interpret this as suggesting that the gap between confirmed cases and total cases was increasing for a long time, but that this isn't continuing anymore.
To understand a global pandemic we need global data.
But even more than one year into the pandemic some of the most basic international data on COVID is missing.
Just because there is no international organization that brings this data together.
A thread.
To make it concrete, let's consider one set of measures for which international data is missing.
Cases, hospitalizations, & deaths *by age* would be very useful measures for decision makers, for epidemiologists, and really for everyone who wants to understand what is happening.
For a disease like COVID – for which the severity of the outcome is so dependent on the age of the infected person –, these metrics are absolutely key.
(e.g. differences in the mortality rate accross countries are to a good part due to different age profiles)