Is there hype/fluff with respect to "metaverse"? No question... just as there is when there is something new and growing.
However, here's what we currently believe "metaverse" is truly about:
it's the stepping stone to a VR based world.
VR is where capital has historically gone to burn. There's a lot of "sunk cost" / investor losses in VR land.
The world, outside niche (albeit growing) areas, is not ready for VR.
Metaverse is an intermediary step.
There are some likely catalysts in the next 12-16 months.
Look at the Venn diagram of
VR people
and
Metaverse people
it's almost a 100% overlapping circle.
Not a coincidence.
Sentiment with respect to VR is abysmal (where capital has gone to die). Sentiment around "metaverse" is anything but abysmal. Yet they're the same, if not converging to the same point...
The apparent pessimism is notable, given a likely catalyst in 2022.
see my "venn diagram" tweet. It's not a coincidence that Facebook is hyping metaverse. They are now several generations into development of VR headsets, and seeing that metaverse bridges between the here/now and the future of VR mass adoption
“For a while, Hwang hedged the portfolio by shorting individual stocks. Some of those short positions, like Under Armour, performed exceptionally well. But others, particularly Tesla, did not.”
“So Hwang retreated from the individual shorts and emphasized broadly shorting the market.”
Told you so
The article quoted above independently corroborates most of what I wrote in my thread. And it too leaves us wondering what happened over the last 1-2 years (which is where I am curious):
The archegos coverage is improving but there’s a key question that remains unanswered:
How/why/when did a guy whose portfolio was concentrated FAANG for many years (and before FAANG was an acronym) - my guess is 2012-2019 -
pivot into levered long highly shorted stocks?
We did diligence on Archegos 6 years ago - which is why I find most of the archegos coverage/comments laughable. None of you ever talked about them until last Friday. Armchair “experts” (meaning, quacks) all over.
Do the math- if their starting AUM was few hundred million $s and was concentrated FAANG - and had insanely long holding periods, maybe in some cases doubling down or averaging up - you then get to your few billion.
Why do some of these people - for example, tech bros - write twitter threads or blog posts on why they’re moving to Florida/Miami?
It’s a free country - live/move wherever you please - but why make a public declaration? I have a few guesses
1. If they’re moving away from high tax jurisdictions like California they want to signal as loud as possible. should they get audited, they have additional “evidence”
2. They’re trying to encourage others - who are on the fence - to move there. “Network effects” etc etc