This is the story of @KKCWhistleblow#Whistleblower client “Gene Ross, father of three, who, in the process of voluntarily cooperating with government prosecutors and regulatory agencies in the criminal and civil actions against Amerindo, lost his job at Bear Stearns…” - @iimag
It should be noted that Bear Stearns “strongly discouraged” the #Whistleblower’s “participation in the legal reckoning that followed, cut his pay, took away his sales team, and subjected him to unchecked harassment and retaliation.”
“After leaving Bear, Ross was forced to sell his home to cover mounting legal bills that eventually bankrupted him. Yet he continued to provide evidence, documents, and testimony as a star witness in the 2008 criminal case that put Vilar and Tanaka behind bars.”
At the criminal trial the federal prosecutor called Ross as a key witness and in summation reminded the jury that Ross had uncovered the fraud, informed his client she had been defrauded, confronted the fraudsters directly & promptly reported the fraud.
Without the #Whistleblower discovering the fraud and his prompt action the SEC and DOJ would not have opened an investigation.
It was soon discovered that the fraudsters had defrauded the #whistleblower’s client out of $5 million and they defrauded other investors. The result was the SEC recovering from these fraudsters in 2014 more than $50 million to return funds lost by other investors.
The SEC’s denial of a #whistleblower award is particularly unjust in this case because the “SEC’s case against Amerindo, based on Ross’s discovery of the fraud, did not proceed until after Dodd-Frank was enacted.”
The SEC’s decision to deny Ross a #Whistleblower award “is literally going out of its way to be discouraging and to prevent future whistleblowers from coming forward,” says @dcolapinto of @KKCWhistleblow.
“The final order ultimately exposes how the #whistleblower program, after a decade of issuing nearly a billion dollars in awards, still exhibits serious flaws in both design and logic.” - writes @truth_eater of @iimag
In this case Ross reported too soon and too late all at the same time, according to SEC ruling. That’s a no-win scenario. Lesson to any SEC #whistleblower: call a lawyer before doing anything even if it means not reporting fraud to defrauded investors or your employer.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Regardless of what you may think of #RealityWinner leaking a classified document she admitted guilt and took responsibility for her actions. That’s more than Manafort or Stone could do.
And, yes, history will consider her a #Whistleblower even though she violated the law.
The harsh treatment of #RealityWinner is likely because what she exposed contradicts Trump’s narrative that Russian interference with the 2016 election was a “hoax.” Like your typical #Whistleblower she also lacks wealth and connections to get special treatment.
The death threats against the #whistleblower & his attorney didn’t happen in a vacuum. Let’s review what else was happening just prior to November 7, 2019 - the day the threat was allegedly made.
On Nov. 1, 2019 @npr broadcast a short segment noting that President Trump “continues” his efforts to unmask the identity of the confidential #Whistleblower. wvpe.org/post/president…
The below tweet is pro-Trump political spin, but not supported by law or facts.
DOJ did not analyze 50 USC §3234, the applicable #Whistleblower protection statute for intelligence community employees, which Trump is required to enforce.
It’s absurd for anyone to argue that a federal employee who reports wrongdoing to an Inspector General is not protected by the #Whistleblower statute. Read 50 USC §3234.
It’s equally absurd to argue that because the law says that if you request confidentiality when you submit a #Whistleblower disclosure the Inspector General will keep it confidential that it’s okay for the POTUS or anyone else to breach confidentiality.
Before Trump started his tweet storm against the #whistleblower, 3 federal appeals court judges considered the constitutionality of the obstruction of justice law designed to protect #whistleblowers & witnesses. They upheld the criminal conviction. thehill.com/blogs/congress…
Our opinion column was published on Dec. 17, but it’s even more timely now following President Trump’s recent use of twitter to retweet posts by his campaign & supporters that attempt to “out” & harass the #Whistleblower.
3 federal judges on the 6th Circuit affirmed the conviction and they agreed that the defendant’s social media postings attacking the #Whistleblower violated 18 USC §1513(g).
It is the President’s duty under the intelligence community #whistleblower statute, 50 U.S.C. §3234(d), to ensure enforcement of intelligence community whistleblower protections.
Intelligence community #Whistleblower protections are provided by multiple laws & regulations, including 50 U.S.C. § 3234, the Inspector General Act, Presidential Policy Directive PPD-19 and other administrative orders and procedures.
With all of the attacks on the Intelligence Community #whistleblower whose Complaint was publicly released to Congress, it’s time to review some basic principles of federal #Whistleblower protection law.
In 2012, Congress strengthened the #Whistleblower protections for federal employees. In 2013, President Obama extended similar protections for intelligence community employees through a presidential directive & in 2014 Congress codified those protections for Intel employees.
Under the 2013 presidential directive, any #whistleblower reprisal claim must be adjudicated consistent with the policies and procedures used to adjudicate reprisal claims filed under the Whistleblower Protection Act, 5 USC 2302(b)(8).