Something I think we’ve been very bad at separating when trying to help people understand risk during the pandemic, especially for kids, is:

1. Risk of getting covid
2. Risk of being seriously ill IF you get covid

When we talk about risk, these things are very different

1/
The first is a product of:

-Prevalence (how many people are infected)
-Exposure (where are you that’s likely to get you infected)
-Variant (per exposure, more by Delta than others)
-Immunity (best by vax, or else infection)

These things change over time, so risk does too

2/
The latter is really a product of:

-Age (risk increases exponentially)
-Comorbidities (e.g. for children, neurodisability or cardiac diseases)
-Immunity

It is not clear whether variants significantly impact this risk - they may somewhat, but it is very uncertain

3/
Importantly, the risk of getting sick once infected does not change much over time, unless you get infected or vaccinated

(although over many years your risk does increase)

This is also true for children

4/
Children’s risk of become unwell if infected is *significantly* lower than adults, and in absolute terms is comparable to their risk from other respiratory viruses

They are all slightly different, but this is broadly true (e.g. IFR ~0.001 for both flu and covid)

5/
What can change is children’s risk of getting infected in the first place

If lots of people in the community are infected with Delta and they are exposed to lots of people, their risk of getting infected increases

This will result in more people being infected overall

6/
This can make it difficult to assess risk when, for example, you hear of more children being admitted to hospital etc

So far, this is usually due to an increased risk of getting infected, but not an increased risk of getting very unwell IF infected

7/
In addition, there are differences to assessing risks at the individual and population level

How worried would we be about one child with covid? Not very worried

How worried would we be about 5 million children with covid? A lot more worried, as some will be very unwell

8/
I think in general the medical/scientific community haven’t been good enough at delineating what type of risks we’re talking about, and how they apply to policy making vs individual risk assessment

I’ll try to summarise…

9/
Risks of a child catching covid are dependent on circumstances (as above)

Risks to an individual child who catches covid are low (like other resp viruses)

Risks of millions of children all catching covid at once are much higher, as even rare bad outcomes happen more often

10/

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Alasdair Munro

Alasdair Munro Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @apsmunro

31 Jul
Incredible review on prolonged symptoms after #COVID19 from SAGE and the ONS

Worth reading in full, but here is a quick summary 🧵

Fortunately some reassuring stuff included in here, especially for kids!

assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/upl…

1/
Firstly, admission that estimates of prevalence are massively uncertain (rage from 2.3% at 12w to >37% at 12w ?!)

Big issues here with vague definitions, method of asking questions, lack of control groups etc

Treat these estimates with extreme caution

2/
Risk factors pretty consistent, and appear to be:
- Increasing age
- Female
- Caucasion
- Obesity
- Asthma
- Poor pre-infection physical/mental health

People more likely to catch COVID-19 unsurprisingly more likely to have persistent symptoms (e.g. Health/Social care)

4/
Read 8 tweets
30 Jul
The idea of #ZeroCovid as a bridge to vaccination made sense in many ways

For countries that managed it, it undoubtedly saved thousands of lives

Whether UK could realistically have ever achieved it, I don't know

In the vaccine era however, #ZeroCovid sadly makes no sense

1/
Eradication of SARS-CoV-2 (no more left on the planet) is impossible, for many reasons

We know there are massive animal reservoirs of the virus

It is here to stay forever, whether we like it or not

aphis.usda.gov/aphis/newsroom…

2/
Putting aside that even achieving elimination (no more left in your country) once you have reached high levels of disease is near impossible (see @TAH_Sci blog)

personalpages.manchester.ac.uk/staff/thomas.h…

The costs of even trying to achieve this for somewhere like the UK would be astronomical

3/
Read 8 tweets
29 Jul
Amazing study of school transmission from Spain 🇪🇸

Shows a clear age dependant transmission gradient - the older the children, the more transmission

Lowest rates occurred in unmasked pre-school children

Overall R*=0.4 in schools

Let's take a look!

1/
journals.lww.com/pidj/Abstract/…
This study used data from the Catalan school surveillance system

All contacts within school bubbles are tested following a positive index case

Linked cases determined by onset within 10d of index

They matched this data against the wider health surveillance system data

2/
Mitigations included masks from age 6 upwards, school bubbles, and increased ventilation

They found data matched well between school and wider health surveillance

This is a massive study of roughly 15,000 index cases within schools

Let's take a look at the results!

3/
Read 9 tweets
23 Jul
🧵
A couple of things people I think people have misunderstood about the school DCT study - lets clarify them!

First, test sensitivity of "only 53%"

Does this mean the test is rubbish?

Well actually, it's irrelevant!

1/
There is a BIG difference between a study of test performance, and real world test implementation

Good tests can be harmful in the real world, bad tests can end up being useful

For this study, we don't care about performance...

2/
This study measured secondary cases compared to quarantine - the outcome we actually care about is people getting infected

There is no noticeable difference here. It could be both are equally terrible! the important thing is there is not a big difference

3/
Read 6 tweets
23 Jul
🧵
Are trials of daily contact testing vs quarantining in schools "unethical"

tldr:
No. They never were, and are obviously not only ethical, but desirable, now we have results of a study

1/
A main concern was regarding equipoise - meaning, was there a balance before a trial of which would be better?

There absolutely was, including in modelling from spi-m, and I outlined that thinking previously here

2/
Results of the study show that there is likely little difference between the two, and testing results in less absence

If there is a difference (there is a range of uncertainty), it is very small, and unlikely important

Obviously there was not a huge difference = equipoise

3/
Read 6 tweets
23 Jul
This is BRILLIANT news!

A randomised trial of daily testing of school contacts of COVID-19 cases found it was just as good (or maybe better) at preventing transmission than sending kids home

It kept kids safe AND in school

This is why we do research ❤️

bbc.co.uk/news/health-57…
There is so much to talk about with this study I will be banging on about it all day

Massive congratulations to the team who put this together

This is evidence which can inform policy all over the world - so proud of the UK leading the way on evidence based policy here
Just in case you come across any strange claims of the study being unethical...

Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(