28kg comes from driving. Changing from petrol/deisel to EV saves 21kg
23kg comes from Electricity generation. Changing to 100% renewable/nuclear saves 23kg... and saves the remaining 15kg HP and EV emissions.
Wow: we have saved 83 out of 100!
What's left?
2/
2kg from industry: steel, cement etc. Carbon capture and concrete alternatives maybe save 1kg.
13kg from farming. If you stop eating meat you *save 5kg
(*not really: I will come back to this)
And if you stop eating entirely you save 8kg.😉
3/
Now the interesting thing about this is the big 3 - which together save 83% - either cost less than the status quo in TCO terms (EVs) or levelized cost per KWh terms (Renewables) or only need a decent market size (HPs) to become cost neutral.
4/
The remaining dribs and drabs will no doubt drop too, with a greener grid and Electric Tractors and emissions-focussed industrial processes.
And as for th 5kg for meat eating... it is bullshit - literally.
It is based on methane emissions. But these GHG's are not like fossil
5/
fuel. As long as there are no more cows here today than 30 years ago the 30 year old farts are breaking down at the same rate as todays ones are emitted.
So have a burger. But no more than 30 years ago.
6/6
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The Tufton St gang changed the EU question from the economy, NI peace, UK power/influence into one of sobwintee, Turks, and health tourism.
1/
They knew what the answers to the first set of questions would be.
Now, in the decarbonisation debate they do not want the question to be: "Heat-pumps vs boilers" or "EV's vs gas-guzzlers" or "Offshore aerogenerators vs gas-fired power stations".
In all 3 cases the...
2/
...green option is far better for air quality and UK jobs (not to mention CO2 emissions) and the UK economy.
EV's are already cheaper in TCO (Total Cost of Ownership) than gas-guzzlers
Renewables have become cheaper per KWh than gas power stations.
The Koch anti-decarbonisation lobby have clearly chosen their attack line: affordability.
They will employ the following tricks:
1. Tot up capital costs but ignore running cost savings
2. Use out of date cost data, ignoring the plummeting costs of renewables and LZCs
1/
3. Quote their ridiculously inflated, 30-year cumulative cost (all "adds" and no "omits") as a single cost per household. To give the impression (a) householders will have to pay it and (b) pay it all in year 1. In reality, as with most infrastructure, the cost will be...
2/
Met with government borrowing at an interest rate of around 0.75% (gilts) or effectively 0% (QE - the interest goes back to the government). So "£100K per household" is in reality £40K borrowing per household"
and an annual interest payment of £300... but starting at £10 in
3/
1. His promise to the voters.
Steve says his promise was "to pay close attention to climate change policy"; he says he has done that now and as a result is against decarbonising by 2050.
Bullshit, Steve: your promise is in the manifesto in black & white (& yellow highlighter)
2. Four lies in one paragraph next.
End of:
- comfortable lives
- mass car ownership,
- foreign holidays,
- domestic heating.
"Project fear" or what?
Calm down Steve, the CCC estimated net zero will mean 2% lower per capita GDP than otherwise in 2050. Brexit passed ....
Unless the Government has a secret supply of Pfizer, it looks to me like they procured enough for 20M 1st doses last year then procured another 30M worth on 28th April.... but it is not getting here until the Autumn.
I am becoming more certain the opening up is a
"Hail Mary" move to conceal the fact that their magnificent vaccine rollout success is turning to sh1t before their eyes. If everyone under 30 gets Covid, and thus has to wait 4 weeks before they can be vaccinated then no-one will know we ran out...
Cunning, eh, Baldrick?
@fascinatorfun I think Dilettante Voice has found the smoking gun. Last year HMG ordered enough Pfizer for 20M first doses. By 30th June it had 0.9M left... with more than 15M under 40's to go and AZ contra indicated for them since 7th April.
But Bojo has been signing off PMQ's every week with "we vaccinate, while you procrastinate". If the vaxx programme slams to a halt, he is holed beneath the waterline.
So I reckon he has said "let her rip: they can get immunity by infection instead"
3/