Y'all blaming President Biden for the way Afghanistan is today but really you need to review what President Trump did there, like capitulating to Taliban demands to free Baladar in 2018, after 8yrs in custody.

An unmitigated fool. Blood on his hands.
nytimes.com/2018/10/25/wor…
Trump has blood on his hands in so many different ways. Along with his henchmen, some of whom are more competent than him and need to be stopped before they succeed at picking up his mantle.

I agreed with many aspects of his foreign policy. But not on Afghanistan.
I literally chose my Twitter handle @FreedomFriesInc to reflect my belief in the #CollectiveSecurity doctrine of institutions like #NATO, #ASEAN, (& the late #ANZUS, killed by NZ in 1986.)

In 2003 France let us down. So we jokingly renamed french fries. It was an early "meme".
United we stand, divided we fall. It's an enduring truth.

Blaming the US alone for failure in Afghanistan is just totally dishonest. Around 40 countries were involved on "our" side. Including the UK and Australia, who sent large contingents there. Even NZ lost 10 soldiers:
And I just learned there are still around 47 New Zealanders in Afghanistan, and for once in our lives we're considering sending NZ Defence Force personnel to get them out.

We cannot thank Australia and the US enough for assisting in this.

stuff.co.nz/national/polit…
But back to the main topic. I supported the coalition interventions in Afghanistan and Iraq from the start. It then became fashionable to oppose the "war."

We're all anti-war, if we have a working moral compass. I am pro self defense. And I do not agree with giving up too soon.
The enemies of the USA know that if they can just wait long enough, there's a chance domestic politics will get a Congressional majority or a POTUS to withdraw, or thaw a freeze.

The Castro regime in Cuba got it's wish in 2015, breathing new life into it's authoritarian rule.
"We don't negotiate with terrorists" was once widely accepted and supported in the USA.

It needs to come back into fashion. Trump is no better than Obama or any other POTUS in living memory, in his record of coddling dictators.

Trump left Biden a mess in Afghanistan.
The Trump presidency started out with high hopes for Afghanistan.

Here is a Jan 2018 thread of mine, with which I still agree on some points, but certainly not others. It's a handy example of Trump's later actions speaking louder than his earlier words:
My 2017 anti-Pakistan regime comments I gladly stand by in 2021.

Although any respect I had for the Modi regime in India has gone. I oppose all Covidiots that allow millions of their own people to die. Trump is not the only one, by a longshot.
IMO 2017 was the best year of the Trump presidency, followed by 2018. You can learn a lot by reading his body language during the press conference the day after the 2018 midterm elections.

The more he loses, the more visible his far right extremism becomes. And he loses a lot.
Having now admitted that Trump's encouragement, enabling & condoning of 1/6 alone makes him the worst POTUS in history, I need to review this almost 4 year old opinion on Obama.

Trump's change of mind on Afghanistan was a major issue in the MAGA mvt.

As the record shows, Trump's 2016 campaign featured "bring home the troops" as a major promise. In 2017 I thought eventually he would keep it. Like many other promises, he didn't.

And now he's trying to attack the man who inherited the Trump foreign & domestic policy messes.
Also relevant is the 2017 Politico feature story on #OperationCassandra, which surprised me in it's opposition to Obama's actions and omissions concerning Hezbollah and Latin America.

Story: politico.com/interactives/2…

My old tweet:
"... but attack we will."

Maybe if the Trump admin had kept this promise, Afghanistan today would not be in the hands of Mullah Baradar, who in 2018 Trump agreed to free after 8 years in custody.

Baradar: nytimes.com/2018/10/25/wor…

My old tweet:
Yes, Trump said he wanted the US to have good relations with these countries.

In his #SouthAsiaStrategy he appeared to send Pakistan (and China) the message that he was a firm friend of their arch enemy, India.

Not smart diplomacy, as it turns out.

Now that I am reading this 2017 speech with the benefit of hindsight, you can see the tough talk against terrorists that has rightly been turned back onto Trump and his henchmen, as their own roles in domestic terrorism are thoroughly investigated.

This part of the speech is quite galling, given recent events.

At the time, Paul Ryan kept a firm thumb on Trump to dial down the crazy. Smart policy. But then he left to build a future POTUS run. Ironically, that contributed to losing the GOP.

Kinda easy to see why I was always going to jump ship when the Qanonsense peddlers took over. What with all my reading of primary source documents and DIY fact checking. Sigh.

More irony for me as I read my years-old beliefs: This one came true, in a way I didn't fully predict.

When Trump encouraged & enabled 1/6, he meant what he said. He hopes his "1776" minded followers will show up for more domestic terrorist attacks.

The above was another of my stream of consciousness threads. As always, IDC if only one person reads it.

I'm willing to admit I was wrong about Trump. Anyone who wants to know more about that and asks in good faith, will get a response.

#CountryOverParty🇺🇸🍟

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Hurricane Watcher - #HospitalCollapseKills

Hurricane Watcher - #HospitalCollapseKills Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @FreedomFriesInc

9 Sep
Thread: I'm prolife and I agree with every word the VP says in this clip.

She refers to the law as it stands. If you want to make elective abortion illegal, you can seek a constitutional amendment. What TX did was wrong, including for the prolife movement itself.
Firstly, I love that a female VP is in office and can say these things at this time. Thank you to everyone who voted for Biden-Harris. You saved so many lives, and ensured the USA could start the long process of restoring democracy.
The abortion debate comes down to whether you support a woman's right to bodily autonomy, or the baby's right to same (incl 50% who are female.) I want to support both, but I can't. The issue forces us to choose the lesser of two evils. Like most of the big political issues do.
Read 12 tweets
3 Sep
These 5 WaPo headlines are an insight into the state of play in the US and the world right now. I discuss them below.

Summary: Our opponents are far right fascism AND our own complacency.
We're now seeing at least daily stories like that of the school principal physically confronted and threatened by a far right fascist MAGA cult parent just for doing his job.

These people are dangerous. They are domestic terrorists and we must use situational awareness 24/7.
I advise reviewing all your personal safety and security arrangements with this in mind.

It's too late once an assailant is in front of you and able to do harm in a matter of seconds.

Also, always, #SeeSomethingSaySomething. @DHSgov has good readiness tips.
Read 16 tweets
3 Sep
(1) 18hrs ago 6 innocents were seriously injured when an ISIS sympathizer stabbed them in a NZ supermarket. Police took out the terrorist. They were meant to watch him 24/7... the PM doesn't think they did anything wrong & won't say how many others are on a watchlist.

#nzpol
(2) I'm not criticizing the heroic rank and file NZ Police members who shot the terrorist, saving dozens of lives.

I'm criticizing their incapable Commissioner who cares more about making excuses for himself, and PM Jacinda Ardern who doesn't see her approach is the wrong one.
(3) What Ardern and the people she allows to be in charge of our public service agencies will never admit is that their actions are worsening the extremely challenging situation NZ is already in, with the pandemic especially.
Read 6 tweets
3 Sep
(1) Thread: Another terrorist attack in NZ

This happened just a few hours ago at 2.40pm. It's 7pm now.

(2) The only fatality was the attacker, who was shot by police, after injuring 6 people. He was:

>known to police and the courts as an ISIS supporter
>a Sri Lankan national who arrived in NZ in 2011
>on a watchlist since 2016

🧐
(3) I've said for years a jihadist attack was inevitable one day in NZ. Relieved no innocents died but the 6 injured are forever changed.

The first NZ terrorist attack in my lifetime was the far right fascist targeting of two mosques on March 15, 2019.

51 people killed.
Read 14 tweets
2 Sep
A bit of thread. About unitary vs federal government models during an emergency like a pandemic.

I focus the most on 5 countries, the main Anglosphere:

UK, US, CAN, AU and NZ.

Only NZ has a unitary system. Now, we are small but:
A major weakness in the federal model is exposed by how these countries have fared so far in the pandemic.

The federal model has some important strengths, and is necessary in a massive country like the US.

I'm saying there are more than two options. They're infinite.
In NZ and AFAIK elsewhere, health agencies are leading the response and not civil defence / emergency management agencies.

This is a huge mistake.

And it ties in with the federal vs unitary debate, too.
Read 16 tweets
1 Sep
Please, Twitter, hire me to edit your draft headlines so you stop embarrassing yourselves concerning hurricanes.

It's not "another" storm. It's the same storm #Ida, after it's been a hurricane but is still a hazard until it is well clear of land.

#HWStormWatch #WxTwitter
There's 3 problems with Twitter's headline.

1. It's absent of punctuation. They use it in other headlines.

2. This causes confusion bc many people don't know how a post-TC is named.

3. Maybe it was deliberate, to generate clicks.
Imma assume it was an innocent mistake on the part of Twitter. Occam's Razor.

If it was deliberate, then it's one of many examples I've seen over the years where potentially saving lives is less important to them than Twitter marketing.
Read 10 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(