Ethereum will be the new government bond.

Staked ETH, or PoS asset of a dominant blockchain, will replace US Treasuries as the risk-free asset in any portfolio.

This shall be the biggest revolution in the history of financial markets.

Here’s how I think it’ll go down 👇
First, how does a “risk-free asset” come to be?

There’s no guarantee in life. Everything has risk. An asteroid can hit earth tomorrow and we all die.

But in practice, people take the debt issued by the US government as a benchmark, risk-free asset, because—
Governments collect taxes. The US has the largest, most robust economy in the world. The US government has the largest, most robust incomes. It literally just takes a cut of the US GDP every year.
When you buy US Treasuries, you’re indirectly taking a share of the US GDP. You can fuss about whether US is issuing too much debt, if yield is artificially low, if monetary policy is over indulgent, yada yada yada...
But at the end of day, investment risk in US Treasuries is still lower than anything else out there. That’s why people take it as the risk-free asset. Every other bond, stock, and property look to US Treasury yield as a basis of their pricing.
At least that’s the regime before crypto came along.

But that changes when a public blockchain starts to power the real economy.

When you do stuff with ETH & other ERC tokens, ethereum collects a fee (i.e. gas).
The more complicated the activity (read: higher value-added), the higher the fee. A simple transfer of funds takes 21000 gas. A token swap on Uniswap requires running a contract and many steps behind the scene, so costs 10x more.
This is like a VAT (value added tax) on the economic value creations happening on ethereum. More activities, more taxes collected.
Right now crypto is playing in the sandbox with itself. The activities are deFi and NFT. But it’s a matter of time before “real economy” stuff starts happening on chain. Settling imports and exports, buying houses and cars, paying employees and contractors…
And let’s not forget a public blockchain is global. Unlike taxes by a nation state government, fees on ethereum are collected world wide with no geo boundary.
Implication: As ethereum integrates with real economy, fee revenue will start tracking the level of real economic activities around the world. Gas fees will become a guaranteed cut taken out of global value creation, i.e. world GDP growth.
Remember why US treasuries are considered risk-free assets? Cuz they are backed by tax incomes from the biggest economy in the world.

But since gas fees are “tax incomes” from the entire world economy, ethereum can single-handedly beat US treasuries at the risk-free asset game.
If you want anything safer and more diversified than a fixed income off of the entire earth GDP, you’d have to start buying assets on Mars and Venus.

Where do the ethereum “taxes” go?

You’re smart. By now you see what I’m going to say next.
Once ethereum switches to proof of stake, the gas incomes that don’t get burned will go to the validators (stakers).
Unlike bitcoin proof-of-work where miners rack up million $$ bills in hardware costs to compete for new blocks, anybody can stake ETH. It’ll be as easy as buying Treasury bonds.
While BTC mining turns into a capital-intensive utility industry, ETH staking will become the fixed-income staple in the portfolio of every average Joe.
What will be the ETH staking yield in the long term?

In the short term things are hard to predict because of too many moving pieces— number of stakers, activity volumes, ETH price, burn rate, etc. @drakefjustin has done great analyses on these.
In the long term, if ethereum keeps its status as the dominant smart contract chain, and grows to power more and more real activities on the world scale, over time the yield should track global growth + global inflation.
The US 10-year treasury yield averages 4.8% in the long run. There’re big swings across time, depending on inflation, monetary and fiscal policies at any given moment. But the long run average yield is close to average US real GDP growth + average US inflation.
The worldwide real GDP growth for the past decade is 2.4%. The world inflation averaged 2.8%.
In other words, if a global risk-free asset had existed over the past decade, the average yield should be around 2.4% + 2.8% = 5.2%.

So a 5% nominal yield appears a rule of thumb for a risk-free base asset in the long term.
Note this is measured using inflation rate of fiat currency, which averages 2-3% a year. If ETH supply growth is lower than that, it will mess up all the assumptions, but not for the reason you may think.
BTW, like this so far? I write about ideas on investment, macro and human potential. Subscribe to my newsletter for updates 👉 natashache.com/newsletter/
Why low inflation is bad for a global base asset?

ETH supply growth is around 4.5% a year right now. Once moving to proof of stake, issuance is set to drop to below 1%. Crypto investors cheer because they think lower supply growth is going to hike ETH price.
While in the short term that’s true, it’s very short-sighted thinking.

Money supply growth + money velocity growth = inflation rate + real GDP growth
As a global base currency, you do not want your money supply to be too high or too low. If money supply grows less than volume of economic activities (real GDP growth), you’ll have systemic deflation.
The opposite way, you’ll have inflation. Both are bad user experience.
Your goal should be to keep prices of things denominated in your currency stable. That requires money supply growth to keep pace with real GDP growth.

If you’re a global base currency and global real GDP grows 2-3% a year, money supply growth needs to be that much as well.
But since you’re only on your way to become that and not there yet, the volume of economic activities covered by you will grow faster than global GDP, until you reach global dominance. That means your money supply needs to grow faster than 2-3%.
The future global base asset will be…?

At the beginning of the post, I said ETH would be a new global risk-free base asset. The truth is any dominant blockchain of sufficient scale can be that. I’m not married to ethereum.
ETH token economics needs to change, on top of scaling and transaction cost issues.

I didn’t even mention bitcoin because that’s already a lost case.
But quite a few ETH killers are gaining traction and more will come. All of them need to be mindful of short-term thinking on token economics.

Anyway, who needs Netflix when you have so much excitement to watch in crypto for free 🍿 🍿 🍿
Like this? I write about ideas to help you become smarter, richer, freer. Follow me on Twitter for updates 👉 @realnatashache .

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Tascha

Tascha Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @RealNatashaChe

17 Sep
If countries are stocks, which ones should you long & which to short?

I used machine learning to grade the industrial health of 190 countries over 30 years. Here’re results on China, US, India & more.

See which countries I’m bullish & bearish about for the next decade 👇
First, a word on how this is done.

My coauthor (Xuege Zhang of Carnegie Mellon) & I used ML algorithm to figure out which products each country should export, given the country’s unique combo of traits. (full paper linked at the end if you’re curious).
We then check if a country is indeed exporting what it should. Each country gets a “health score” of their export portfolio every year. It measures the similarity btw actual exports and algorithm’s recommendations:

higher score = healthier economy.
Read 37 tweets
7 Sep
People angry about a jpeg 🖼 selling for $1 mn fail to see the big picture.

If you understand the nature of assets & long-term macro backdrop, it’s easy to see why NFTs will grow exponentially.

Here’s a simple framework to help wrap your head around this new asset class.
WHAT ARE ASSETS?

They are instruments to transfer ownership of value across time and space.
Your Amazon stock is ownership on Amazon future earnings. Your ounce of gold is ownership of $1830 (today’s gold price) worth of economic output— you can use it to claim a share of today’s GDP by, say, using your gold to buy some groceries.
Read 36 tweets
31 Aug
If you mint a NFT based on a physical asset, e.g. a 💎 , how much should it be worth?

It seems a complex question, but is actually easy to answer w/ classical asset pricing principles.

Let’s see how to set a floor price for my diamond NFT & learn some asset pricing methods 👇
For background, I’m doing a destroyed-diamond NFT experiment, where I buy a real diamond—> create an associated NFT—> destroy the diamond—> sell the NFT.

You can follow the progress of the project here:
To price a new asset, we can think of its value as the sum of values of all its features.
Read 31 tweets
26 Aug
Me: I bought a diamond yesterday.

Mom: Nice. They’re good investments.

Me: I’m going to smash it & sell it as a NFT.

Mom: Say again?

So I tried to convince my mother (accountant w/ 30 yr experience) that NFT is a better asset than diamond.

Did I succeed? Let’s find out 👇
First off, if you’re out of loop, this all started b/c I’m doing an experiment inspired by all the brilliant comments people made on this tweet of mine:

I decided to buy a real diamond, create an associated NFT, destroy the diamond, and see if the NFT retains value. I told my mother about this on the phone. Like everyone else, she immediately went— this is crazy.
Read 40 tweets
24 Aug
Ok, you've all convinced me this is an experiment that needs to be done. So here's the deal.

I'm going to buy a real diamond--> create a NFT for it--> list it on @opensea--> destroy the original diamond. I'll ping this tweet on my profile so you can track progress.

Stay tuned.
STEP 1: Create an @opensea account.

STATUS: Done.

opensea.io/collection/tas…
STEP 2: Buy a hammer for diamond smashing (Never smashed a diamond before. Hope this one'll do the job, or I'll need to find another way).

STATUS: Done. Image
Read 15 tweets
19 Aug
#Bitcoin fails as a money b/c of its naive monetary policy.

Many people think government printing too much is evil, so a fixed money supply must be good. The reality: a money that cannot expand would crush the economy and put us all in poverty.

Here’s why and how to fix it.
To see this we need to understand why monetary deflation and expanding economy do not go together.

Let’s simplify so it’s easier to see. Say, we have an economy with 1 product— twinkie, and 1 currency— dollar. Price of 1 twinkie = $1.
Alice, a twinkie entrepreneur, hires Bob to help make twinkies. Alice’s company makes 1 twinkie a year, so company revenue is $1. Bob’s salary is $0.5 and Alice takes the other $0.5.
Read 42 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(