So this is an excellent reply, so time for a Friday morning cup of tea in the eucalyptus tree on how strategic certain coking coals are. There is a reason BHP tossing everything out of the pram except for BMA...1/n
First, the reserve/resource data the koala references was, let's just say a mosaic to put together and sometimes when it was obvious what we were trying to figure out, people stopped talking to us. But stand by the estimate 2/n
So first, coal specs...this is what is Dalian deliverable 3/n
This is the Platts specs for the benchmark (note the CSR, sulfur, and vol) 4/n
And for some reference of where various coals sit using vol & CSR, a slide from Warrior 5/n
Why does the koala bring this up? Because outside of some seams in the Bowen basin (BMA/BHP & Anglo), the Elk Valley in BC, and Mine #7 in Alabama, just not that many coals that hit that 70+ CSR and <20 vol 6/n
One sidebar metric not considered here so far is fluidity, helps things flow smoothly in the steelmaking process, thats a prime characteristic in High Vol A product from the US and some Aussie mines along the Blackwater rail line and why they are valued so highly 7/n
So why does the koala bring this up? Because historically Matt is correct, this stuff didn't really matter, but in an ESG focused world where the productivity of furnaces to make high quality steel & minimized emissions/t steel produced, raw material input quality matters 8/n
And China is trying to crack iron ore px at the point in the year shipments inflect higher, but still need the steel, and has serious supply issues domestically and seaborne (esp if Aussie coals still no good politically), so things are "weird" right now for coking in China 9/n
But bigger picture, makes you appreciate how valuable long life reserves are going to be for high quality coking coal since the alternative is, you know, billions of capex on HBI/DRI to enable natural gas to replace coking coal globally, or longer term hydrogen 10/n
Bottom line, yea China (and Mongolia) has an ocean of coal, but it's not of the high quality you desire if you're trying to optimize for furnace productivity AND minimize emissions. The coking coal prices we look at are the high quality prices, & when steel demand is good...11/n
You can see where the koala is going with this. There's a reason even during a decade long bear mkt, the AVG PRICE for "benchmark" coking coal ~$180/t. When the Goonyella mines can't deliver, things get super interesting because those reserves are so rare around the world. 12/12
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
This is all from BTU filings, sorry the koala didn't populate some of it, the koala is selectively lazy...2017/18 was last real coal cycle...1/n
1st let's start with the PRB, margins in decline, volumes in decline, best case, you hold serve on volumes, maybe get back to ~$260MM EBITDA assuming peak margins in the segment from $194MM in '20, but w/e...
Ob-la-di, ob-la-da
Life goes on, bra
La-la, how the life goes on
2/n
Other US Thermal, let's just mark it back to $250MM EBITDA, or you know what, $300MM EBITDA to be optimistic, so we got $560MM of "US Gross EBITDA"...we can take on export economics another time...3/n
BHP
Peabody
Elliott
Scot ready to rage in Barcelona
Rallying cry of "it's a call on $2 Henry Hub!!!"
Darling emerges from C11
N Goonyella
Failed JV
Oh btw, coal prices correct too
New CEO
WSB
Now here we are
& BTU is about to buy BHP's "Tier 2" coal book
Let's koala down...1/n
So let's begin not with BTU but with BHP and the war that was launched in the spring of 2017. Elliott wanted BHP to do a couple things - collapse the dual listing (still own ~5% of the PLC, it's why once/yr we get a compression on "BHP will do something this yr") and...2/n
They wanted shale gone too (yea no shit, even BHP agreed with that)
And they wanted buybacks...let's go into the mind of BHP during this time.
The koala says let's remember the BHP interal acronym SPOM
Shale
Potash
Olympic Dam
Minera Escondida
The 4 ROIC laggards in the group 3/n
With the trend to sulphide deposits this decade in the copperbelt, the koala proposes the most impactful ESG investment that could be made right now is copper smelting capacity in the DRC which would be hydropowered. Let's discuss...1/n
Kamoa-Kakula is all sulphide, Mutanda oxides almost depleted, will then be sulphide, same with Kinsevere. TFM may have another decade of oxides but either way...sulphide deposits produce copper concentrate not metal. What is copper concentrate Koala? 2/n
Copper concentrate is a powder that is 25-50% Cu depending on the minerology of the ore deposit. If its chalcopyrite dominant, closer to 25%, if its pure chalcocite, 50%+ is possible. Why does this matter? 3/n
We need to talk about capital allocation in gold producers. First, the koala is referencing this off of multiple sellside comps tables that say senior producers (1mm+ ozpa) trade at 0.7-1.3x spot gold 5% NAV...let’s get into it 1/n
So what explains the variance in valuation? It’s jurisdictions of operations and in some cases market understands and prices in upside optionality in an asset being realized before it’s formally in the estimates. 2/n
But let’s step out to 10k feet. We all get dividends are value neutral, company gives the option to allocate capital to its shareholders. Dividends are a transfer of optionality. Buybacks acquire an asset (company stock) that will generate a return. Growth capex same thing 3/n