There are a few things to look at when analyzing a rights issue as a special situations play. Capital allocation skills of the management rank right at the top. Fundamental question - is it growth capital or a cover-up for fiscal misprudence in the past? (1/13)
Let's see how to spot the ones that may be covering up past fiscal misprudence. In this example, I take NxtDigital Limited, with 1100 crore market cap. Previously called Hinduja Ventures, it provides TV broadcast and broadband services. (2/13)
NxtDigital announced a rights issue of Rs 300 crore in May 2021, in 2:5 ratio at a price of Rs 300/share. Further, it also paid Rs 5.50 annual dividend for FY21. At the same time, company has incurred negative PAT at consolidated level for 7 consecutive years. (3/13)
From the first ever concall held in May 2021, it was revealed that the funds from rights issue will be used to pare debt and improve EBIDTA margins significantly. Further, company is seeking to sell non-core assets to pare more debt. Sounds like a turnaround, eh? (4/13)
Investors never question dividend by companies. Some cash is better than no cash, right? However, the logic of giving out dividend also needs to be scrutinized. If a company isn't making free cash flows, there is little objective logic to paying dividend. (5/13)
Some may ask, what's the problem if minority shareholders are getting the payout too? Well, the answer doesn't lie in who is paying money to who, but whether any money should be paid out to anyone in the first place. (6/13)
In the last 7 years, NxtDigital has been paying out dividend robustly. NxtDigital incurred loss of Rs (575) Cr b/w FY13-21, which amounts to Rs (277) per share, while paying out cumulative dividends of Rs 136 in that period, while incurring Rs 1100 Cr in interest. (7/13)
With such huge interest outflow, why was Nxtdigital paying out such substantial dividends? Rs 287 Cr paid over 7 years is identical to the current fund raise. So instead of using cash to pare debt, Nxtdigital paid it out, is now asking the amount back via a rights issue! (8/13)
Presented this way, it becomes apparent that cash is basically flowing out of the company regardless of how the business is operationally faring. Yes, the promoters don't get 100% of it, but they do get 65-70% of it. (9/13)
Interesting to see that NxtDigital absorbed a subsidiary in FY19 and wrote off Rs 1300 Cr invested into the subsidiary. This scheme of arrangement led to the equity falling from 2000 Cr to just over 200 Cr. 1800 crore of equity wiped out with an accounting adjustment. (10/13)
From the above, and the management speak in the concall relating to improving the DE ratio (refer 4/13), it is apparent that the need for fund-raise is inexplicably poor capital allocation in the past. (11/13)
In this context, the primary conclusion for this rights issue will be a big NAY, because none of the funds will contribute to growth and future cash flows may be misallocated to the purpose the management deems fit, including more subsidiaries or paid out as dividend. (12/13)
NxtDigital's balance sheet and accounts have a lot more to point out, but this is a limited perspective on analyzing capital allocation history in rights issue. For educational purpose only and not as a recommendation to play the rights issue, or otherwise. (13/13)
Epilogue: Do read the May 21 transcript to get an idea of how the management portrays or sees the business, as a contrast to the analysis above.

bseindia.com/xml-data/corpf…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Leading Nowhere

Leading Nowhere Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @leading_nowhere

26 Aug
Noticed Shri Jagdamba Polymer Limited (SJPL) featuring recently, as a long term pick.

It's difficult to find a bigger potential conflict of interest from a minority investor's perspective.

Let's see👇 (1/11)
Fact: SJPL promoters have another unlisted entity Shakti Polyweave Pvt Ltd (SPPL) with exact same business. ALways a red flag, but lots of promoters have small side-busineses. Fortunately, public credit reports of SPPL have tons of useful information to understand further. (2/11)
SJPL was founded by RB in 1985, whereas Shakti Polyweave Private Limited (SPPL) founded in 1997 and identifies HA as the main promoter. While RB serves as director on both SJPL and SPPL, HA seems full-time in SPPL but does not seem to have any fixed role in SJPL. (3/11)
Read 12 tweets
25 Aug
Asian Granito (AGL) scrambling to ensure the upcoming Rs 225 Cr rights issue doesn't run into headwinds. Promoters recently sold 12% of AGL to invest into a related party, and promoters will now invest back into AGL via rights issue! What's up 👇 (1/7)
Promoters justify 12% stake sale in AGL for investment into a related entity Adicon Ceramica LLP, where they state they have no holding. Weak argument, because business is intertwined and a designated partner of the LLP is a director in all material subsidiaries of AGL. (2/7)
AGL recently sold 18% holding in an associated listed company Astron Paper & Board, for 47 Cr. Now, promoters in this clarification state the rights funds will be used to primarily clear debt of Crystal Ceramics (CCL). But CCL isn't heavily indebted, debt is only Rs 140 Cr. (3/7)
Read 7 tweets
22 Aug
This thread below was an example of allocation policies you don't want to find when analysing a rights issue. Let's see the other end of the spectrum. Natural Capsules Limited (NCL) announced a rights issue on 05 Aug 21 to raise growth capital. (1/26)
Why NCL with 100 Cr market cap? There are many small manufacturers like NCL. Without economies of scale, smaller players suffer from high fixed costs, obsolete machinery and lower operating efficiencies, which generally depresses margins and constrains future growth.(2/26)
Small companies can take decades to grow to a size where economies of scale kick in, or where they are able to benefit from favourable supply-demand situations. The objective, thus, is finding companies at cusp of higher return on invested capital and economies of scale. (3/26)
Read 28 tweets
10 Aug
What we're seeing in small caps and mid caps - broad decline and lack of momentum - is natural in the rotation cycle. If your companies continue to grow earnings, they'll be back and beyond in a few quarters. If not, you picked lemons. No amount of narrative can change this.
This is usually the time when investors start to doubt the narrative they believed so far. Pain of loss hurts a lot more than pleasure of profit. It's scientifically proven. It's difficult to believe "sector has tailwinds" when your own money is disappearing before your eyes.
It's easy to imagine a future where you're just minting money punting on stocks (I did too). Many would contemplate leaving their jobs. And now there's that knot in the pit of your stomach. Or maybe I'm too early? Another 20% down should definitely trigger it.
Read 11 tweets
30 Jul
Windlas Biotech DRHP - Boulevard of broken dreams for US PE fund 👇 (1/n)
Introduction: Windlas Biotech Limited (WBL) is a Contract Development and Manufacturing Organization (CDMO) for domestic pharmaceutical companies. This is 'hot' industry right now, so the IPO has been optimistically priced at 50X earnings with a price band of Rs 448-460. (2/n) ImageImage
WBL has had average performance in the last 3 years, with around 10% EBIDTA margin on average . 2019 was a good year but earnings have been stagnant for last 3 years. Cash flows are actually decent, with good conversion and some annual addition into fixed assets. (3/n) ImageImageImage
Read 28 tweets
21 Jul
PayTM IPO DRHP - Who moved my cheese? 👇 (1/n)
One97 Communications (One97) is primarily a one-man show. The board of One97 features 8 directors, of which 6 sit in the USA. Management team in India consists of Vijay Sharma (VS) and his lawyer (Pallavi Shroff). Yep, one man with 14.6% shareholding and a lawyer. (2/n) ImageImage
Let's talk about Paytm Payments Bank Limited (PPBL), though, the engine underneath the layers of One97 and behind almost every meaningful vertical of One97. VS holds 51% of PBBL. And One97 has an option to buy this stake. (3/n) ImageImageImageImage
Read 24 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(