Now that @elonmusk has confirmed @Tesla will be using #LFP in some US Model 3's the normal Q's around patents and licensing have arisen.

This is a thread on the 3 key patents and why #China can produce low cost LFP

#battchat

1/8
Patent 1 - The first LFP structural patent was filed by Nobel prize winner John Goodenough in 1996, granted in 2003 and expired in 2017.

The patent described the performance of the material and its use in batteries.

patents.google.com/patent/US65146…
Patent 2 - This was filed by the @UMontreal. It was granted in 2008, and expired earlier this year.

This described how the performance of LFP, which has a low electronic conductivity, can be improved by coating it in carbon.

patents.google.com/patent/EP10491…
Patent 3 - Was filed by @hydroquebec, @UMontreal & CNRS in 2001, but only granted in 2007. It expires in the US in 2022, and September 2021 in Europe.

It brings the two other patents together and describes a method to synthesis the coated material.

patents.google.com/patent/US72852…
The three patents were tied together to create a license under the consortium lifepo4ag.com
It has never been defended in China, but has been licensed around the world to companies like BASF, Aleees and Mitsui. Chinese producer Pulead is a also licensee
While the license costs millions of dollars a year, and licensees have to pay additional fees for each kg of LFP produced, the impact on LFP cathode prices is limited.

The real reason that Chinese companies can produce low cost LFP is because the government in China...
provided high subsidies for cathode production facilities between 2014-17 when lithium carbonate and hydroxide prices were high. This means that the production costs for LFP made in Chinese facilities are lower than the rest of the world.
While Tesla will benefit from low pack prices by importing LFP from China, it will have to pay a 10% tariff on those packs. However, by importing packs it will free up capacity at Gigafactory 1 for other vehicles while also reducing the companies demand for nickel

8/8

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with James Frith

James Frith Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @JamesTFrith

8 Jul
Great to see the Korean Government supporting its battery manufacturers and industry by committing $35b

bloomberg.com/news/articles/…

The trend amongst governments (Europe, U.S., U.K., China, Japan, Korea) in approaching the battery development is similar.

Thread below

#battchat
1) Industry-University-Research Solidarity and Cooperation (from the Korean plan)

To stay ahead in the battery industry governments are recognizing the importance of investing in early stage research on next-gen tech, but more importantly having industry and academia collaborate
1b) We see this globally, in the U.K. you have the Faraday Battery Challenge and @FaradayInst.

In Europe, @InnoEnergyEU, EBA and Battery 2030.

In the U.S. the DoE has been pivotal in developing next gen tech through @ARPAE.

In Japan the Battery Association for Supply Chain.
Read 8 tweets
21 Apr
Last week @BloombergNEF published its first outlook for Solid-state adoption, featured in the @climate article bloom.bg/2Pal36L.

Here is a quick thread on some of the key points:

1/6 #battchat
1. We expect solid-state cells to be adopted in premium EVs first because they will be higher cost than liquid based cells.

2. We expect they could be cheaper by 2033, after this point adoption in non-premium segments accelerates.
3.We modeled EV economics, assuming the increase in range for a given pack size (kWh) would be favored. But if auto's use smaller packs to achieve the same range as liquid based cells, EVs using solid-state cells could be affordable sooner. It will probably be a mix in reality.
Read 6 tweets
13 Jan
Solid-state battery adoption will happen this decade, and cells could be cheaper than liquid based cells.

$85.6/kWh - Liquid based NMC (622)

$69.3/kWh - Solid electrolyte, NMC (622), lithium metal

$51.7/kWh - Solid electrolyte, next gen. cathode, Li metal

Thread
#battchat
At the end of 2020, @BloombergNEF adapted its BattMan model to integrate solid-state cells.

At scale with developed supply chains, solid-state cells could be manufactured for 80% of the cost of liquid cells - with the same cathode.

When optimised they could be 40% cheaper...
A conventional cell is an 60Ah NMC (622) pouch cell manufactured in todays facilities.

Benchmark SSB is 60Ah NMC (622) pouch type solid state battery, produced on manufacturing lines of the same speed as our conventional cell. Using Lithium metal anode foil.
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(