1/ A thread about the relationship between getting older and learning new things.

🧵👉👉
2/ It’s a weird relationship. One way of looking at it is through the lens of the explore-exploit tradeoff.
3/ In reinforcement learning, when you have to act in a novel environment and learn in an online way, there's a tension between trying new things vs doing the things you’ve already learned are good.
4/ When you’re new to an environment, you know nothing so you’re better off spending all your time exploring.

But when that environment is pretty well-known, exploration doesn’t buy you much and so you should focus on exploiting the things you’ve learned already.
5/ Figuring out that tradeoff in general is a hard problem.

This is all pretty well-known.
6/ And this is what we do already in life. When allowed, kids spend all their time playing, exploring, and generally learning about this new environment called “the universe”. In fact, their brains are wired to do so.
7/ Conversely, old ppl will get less value from trying new things, supposedly, so they stick to what they know.

In the ancestral environment that makes sense, since that world wasn’t nearly as diverse as ours is today.

Which is why old people can seem “stuck in a rut”.
8/ I see this happening to myself too.

When I was a kid, learning about a new thing felt like “Ooh, new thing! Let’s learn about it!” I see it in my kids. But for me, now the reaction usually “Oh, new thing. It’s probably dumb.”

But, what does that transition look like?
9/ I claim it goes in 3 stages:

A. New thing, I like learning new things.
B. New thing, sounds interesting but I’m busy. I’ll look later.
C. New thing, I know nothing about it. Not worth my time.
10/ A -> B happens because life happens. You leave school, get a job, and it’s your time in life to make hay.

“Get ahead in life” by doing the important things. Start exploiting!
11/ But why does B -> C happen?

I claim it’s caused by A -> B. The more new things you pass up on learning about, the harder it gets to learn about subsequent new things! You fall farther and farther behind.
12/ The easiest place to see this is old ppl and tech. Even ppl who lived a whole career doing tech fall victim to this. My dad, for example.

They slowly fall behind, and now they’re 10 years+ behind and there’s no chance of getting them to jump on a Discord server or Tiktok.
13/ If course if you ask them, they’ll tell you “it’s stupid”.

And it is, to them, but that’s partly a post-facto justification for the fact they don’t know about it, or don’t care to learn.
14/ Case in point: my relationship with crypto and DLT.

I’ve known about it for over a decade now. When it first came out, I thought “wow, that’s cool, I should look into it”. And I did a bit, enough to learn how the tech works, but then I ignored it.

I was busy.
15/ Fast forward a few years, and it’s clear that crypto trading was a thing. But by then my instinct was:

“Bah, crypto has no obvious economic value, I’ve got better things to trade.”

And I probably would have left it at that except for two lucky facts.
16/

A. I have younger friends, ones who aren’t as far along on the ossification spectrum.
B. I like making money. I’ll learn anything if there’s EV there.
17/ So I started. Now a few months into the journey, and I’m still faced with the same learning problem.

“MEV, what’s that? Sounds weird, I’ll stick to my CEX trading.”

“NFTs? So stupid, and plus you can’t even get short. Forget it.”
18/ Do I *have* to learn this?

Then I start, and I remember that I *like* learning.

And that “what’s important” isn’t written in stone.
19/ What's important changes, and the only way you’ll figure out the new important things is by learning some things that feel dumb and worthless.

If you’re never learning stupid stuff, you’re not learning much.
20/ And so it goes. I have to keep reminding myself I’m not a hunter gatherer. The world I live in is so rich in opportunities, and getting richer all the time.

100% exploit, or even 85%, is just clearly too much.

True at age 45, and it’ll be true at age 85.
21/ The good news in all of this, for older people, is that old knowledge is VALUABLE.

Some of the biggest joys and best trades happen when old knowledge is applied in new areas. Because usually those new areas are being created by young people who don’t have much experience.
22/ An old person being flexible enough to learn new things, and partnering with younger people, is the great sweet spot where anything can happen.

ps. Don’t yell at me about old/young. Y’all know what I mean.

/END
Addendum because I already got a DM about it: the people I most like to read on the Twitter are people who seem enthralled with learning new things.

@KrisAbdelmessih @ReformedTrader @nope_its_lily @vgr and a bunch of others I'm sure I'm forgetting.
@tylercowen obviously too.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Agustin Lebron

Agustin Lebron Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @AgustinLebron3

14 Sep
1/ Observed correlation:

The better the trader, the less they care about which specific product/market they're trading.

That doesn't mean they don't have deep knowledge of the market or product. Far from it.

It means they don't *care*.
2/ Conversely, I see a lot of aspiring, new, and frankly bad traders who care a *lot* about the product.

"I trade options," "I trade futures" like it's a religious commitment. It's not. The product you're trading is a means to an end, at least if you care about money.
3/ One of the founders of my former company loved saying something like:

"If they made financial markets illegal tomorrow, we'd probably suffer for a while but we'd eventually be fine. We'll just go find something else to trade."

I think he was right.
Read 5 tweets
27 Jul
There’s a subtle but very real fallacy about backtesting that lots of smart quant-y people fall into. I’ve fallen into it many times. And arguably I still do, just in more and more subtle ways.

A thread 👉👉

1/n
So you have a trading strategy, and you want to backtest it to see if it’s any good. Being good boys and girls and others, we know we mustn’t overfit to the data we already have.

We know that historical data is precious gold, and it must be used carefully.

2/n
Well, imagine I propose the following solution: build a model of the market in all its gory detail: fat tails, heteroskedasticity, vol clustering, etc etc. I calibrate this model using historical data, and it’s pretty good.

It's awesome in fact.

3/n
Read 14 tweets
14 Jul
1/ How the hiring game is like trading, and vice versa.

A thread. 👉👉👉
2/ Most of what I talk about here is trading, but one of the things that pays my bills is helping companies get better at hiring.

I don’t usually talk much about that.

Mostly because the audience for that stuff is… niche.
3/ But it’s become clear, over the years of helping clients hire better, that a lot of what I’m teaching is trading skills and mindsets.

Here’s what I mean...
Read 29 tweets
16 Jun
1/ I immigrated to the US 20 years ago, and I don't regret the decision. The people, the opportunities. It really *is* a wonderful country.

But downsides exist and they can basically all be summarized by the leafblower.

A thread... 👇
2/ What is a leafblower? It's a motorized wind generator that moves light outdoor particles (leaves, twigs, dirt/dust).

Facts about the common leafblower and its typical use:
3/ It's gas-powered with a 2-stroke engine.

That means it's incredibly loud and incredibly smelly. You can't mistake the odor. It's an crappy-machine solution to a pseudo-problem.
Read 8 tweets
2 May
1/ Reading @nope_its_lily and this hit hard:

"In all honesty, most finfluencers have pretty shit takes on the market. It kind of arises based on the mismatch between the skills required to actually trade and the skills required to market oneself."

nopeitslily.substack.com/p/a-polemic-an…
2/ That statement is insanely and ridiculously correct.

I think everyone who has other high-value uses of their time goes through the same thought process.

"Why am I doing this?"
3/ I mean, if you wanted to read and learn from #fintwit, you could do so without posting.

If you're not selling anything (or trying to raise AUM which is the same thing), it makes very very little sense.
Read 9 tweets
20 Apr
I just answered an emailed question. I suspect @KrisAbdelmessih @SinclairEuan @therobotjames and others get these too.

"I'm a smart engineering/CS/math student/graduate. How do I get into quant trading?"

A thread. 👉

1/n
2/ I'm going to preface this by asking an important question:

Why trading?

Almost every outsider has an idea of what trading is that's pretty far from the reality. It's not "deploy cool ML models on gigabytes of data". It's:
3/
- Do I have enough cash margin in account JP44315A?
- Why does the data format disseminated by broker X suck so much with this new update?
- How do I optimize my tax footprint?

And a thousand other little annoyances. Plus:

- Am I about to incinerate $ somehow?
Read 10 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(